Follow the glitter!

me squinting looking for the drag Queen category

Thank you for the feedback. Are you referring to the plot under the "Deductions from Gross Salary" section?

Imagine being a "developed country" while having the sixth leading cause of death be government sanctioned suicide 😭 what a joke of a nation

[removed]

It’s accepted as fact because it absolutely is fact. Men are second class citizens when it comes to rights to their children

I can't answer that from my work. If you want to play with the data, you can sign up at Statista for free and get spreadsheets you can smoosh around.

Smoosh, squish and grind aren't official DS terms, but go ahead and play.

This ain’t fucking it

Looks great but the two different greens are sometimes hard to distinguish. Especially on the switch like buttons.

Is this saying that kids who's parents remarry are less likely to be abused?

I'm just daylighting abusers of children, starting with the most likely to harm.

> The bias was part of legal guidance to judges called "Tender Years Doctrine".

"Was" being the operative word. Decades ago. The fact that you overlooked the relevant point that men in stay at home parent roles usually are awarded custody is a bit disingenuous. You don't have to "concur" with my analysis because it's not an analysis, it's a fact written in legal precedent and observed regularly. So not really a debatable topic...

Thanks. I work strictly with large-set open data. I don't do book report research as much of it is from a methological echo chamber. I let others debate that stuff.

Lots of synthesis of "existing literature" involving unrepresentative sample size and very, very laggy reporting.

I know in Canada, the government data science talent pool is extremely thin. Their output is known to be really slow and lumpy, generally using deprecated technologies.

In my country, we're still wrapping our heads around our indigenous genocide (in progress). The colonist thugs involved were teachers, social workers and bureaucrats. These have perpetuated lies for 200 yrs. It'll continue as long as we like mineral rights.

Despite federal open gov mandates, the Canadian data is but a trickle of molasses in winter.

These numbers skyrocketed after society converted to wire hangers.

Can't concur with your analysis. The bias was part of legal guidance to judges called "Tender Years Doctrine".

Check out "Tender Years Doctrine" in the US.

You should look into *** Tender Years Doctrine *** that instituted arbitrary gender bias in child custody. Fathers were / are routinely separated from their children with wide legal and institutional support.

Some states changed this legal default as recently as 2016 (needs fact checking).

The doctrine's bias is well known and documented as being a critical factor of enabling abuse in plain sight as you put it.

Thanks for taking the time to check it out.

[removed]

That's why I like Data Sci - unarguable facts can daylight the abusers.

Covid isolated children with their abusers. Expect to see more of this stuff under a public health lens.

It's like those studies (and PSA campaigns) years ago confirming violence against women is mostly from their partners. In this case child abuse, likewise is more likely from a mother.

Comparing 1950s India to 2000s alone, things have gotten better

Based on COVID there's a fair chance 30 years for population to peak isn't the most likely odd

:)) the second option is for child allowance, which can be share between parents. It has a small effect on the deducted taxes an social security contribution during the year.

[deleted]

ahh.. now i see why this has nearly as much upvotes as comments.