A legend could go a long ways here.

1. you need to remove the reference year (present day) from this
2. this means nothing if it's not discipline specific and very likely even ranking of institution specific and even public vs private
3. How are you ever going to get data from private institutions?

As a Tennessean I would have not guessed nuclear. But Go Vols!

Nah fam of all the Pizzas Pizza Hut is still the most expensive

Me neither but it’s cool being able to look back at these trends. It would be much more difficult (maybe impossible?) to do so without this kind of device

Thanks! Yeah still looking. I know enough GIS to make the river into straight line segments defined by river length with each segment having the attributes of the census boundary it went through, but I don’t know what process to use to “warp” the census boundaries like on that ruler. On the ruler, the boundaries are abstracted bc they’ve been pulled/pushed to make a straight line, but they still correspond to the original geography/topology.

I liked /u/anarcho-stripperism pizza ranking better

I dont need a gizmo to tell me how much exercise I get.

Actually, it is a graph of salary vs year you got your PhD, not salary vs years since PhD. Someone who gets a PHD today will probably be making much less in 20years, than someone who got their PhD in 1960 after 20years. And year you got your PhD may matter way more than years since PhD.

Are you still looking for advice on this? I’m not familiar with GIS programs so much, but such things could be done through Python or R.

I’d guess the key is just to measure the length of the river point to point and then using overlaps or distance measures to calculate which features exist at which point along the river. The visualisation itself is quite custom, but possible through libraries like ggplot, bokeh, etc. Some labels/annotations might need to be added manually via illustrator or something if there’s a very specific look you are after.

Hmm that's weird, I thought the photo looked rly good compared to many here

You know Russia has nukes right? If they want a region to be unlivable for centuries they can already do that.

Stanford publishes their 2022 faculty average 9-month salaries - $192K, starting at $97K for a lecturer to $268K for full professor. They can add another 30% if they teach in the summer or have research grants for the summer. And they can spend 20% time consulting with no salary limit. Palo Alto is a very high cost of living area.

That was my thought too. Papa John’s has some of the worst sauce in my area and they gave it an 8.

Mouthfeel you say?

Sees the pictures damn An how did u screw up Ur reatraunt that much.

You’d have to do that by discipline cause in the sciences you don’t get into a doctoral program without having financial support either through scholarship, research associate positions, grants, etc. Very different from the arts from what I’ve heard.

Thank you 💜🏴‍☠️

[removed]

sankeymatic.com

What data visualization software you use for these plots?

Would be interesting to see this with different branches of science to see how they compare

Ya just the default loess via geom_smooth in ggplot. I'd like to take some time to model it more intentionally, but I wanted to start by seeing what trends emerged without imposing any restrictions.

…so the same price.

Everybody knows the rules.