Recent comments in /f/deeplearning
westeast1000 OP t1_j2podzu wrote
Reply to comment by hayAbhay in Any inspiring and engaging deep learning courses for beginners? by westeast1000
Will give that a go thanks
westeast1000 OP t1_j2poccg wrote
Reply to comment by turntable_server in Any inspiring and engaging deep learning courses for beginners? by westeast1000
Agree fastai jumps right in but i was hesitant too because of the frameworks
[deleted] t1_j2m7lpq wrote
Reply to comment by hayAbhay in Any inspiring and engaging deep learning courses for beginners? by westeast1000
[removed]
hayAbhay t1_j2m7l6n wrote
If you're a complete beginner and you're okay with a specific domain, I highly recommend the UMich Deep learning for Computer Vision by Justin Johnson.This is an excellent introductory course since it assumes no prior knowledge but most importantly Justin does an excellent job at providing solid foundational intuitions for deep learning (he taught CS231 with Karpathy). If you don't like Computer Vision, I still recommend the first 6-7 lectures.
I'll always recommend Andrew Ng's course for some broad basics alongside it as well. After that, you can jump into NYU's DL course by Yann and Alfredo. Imo Yann provides some of the best and most concise abstractions for some very complex concepts. If you're a beginner, some of it might go over your head. But once you have some general sense for the lay of the land and hands on experience, his abstractions are profound.
turntable_server t1_j2m67ch wrote
You could try the fastai course, it jumps right into doing some practical applications.
It is a decent introduction, but I strongly recommend learning from some other source along with that, as programming fastai relies very much on their custom non-standard framework.
[deleted] t1_j2lvn48 wrote
[removed]
Nerveregenerator t1_j2l6yk6 wrote
Ai is inherently filled with theory and concepts. Not knowing these concepts will prevent you from building much of anything useful currently
psychorameses t1_j2e6yv6 wrote
Reply to comment by Ashraf_mahdy in Incorporating Deep Learning into my MSc by Ashraf_mahdy
Sure, I'm just playing Genshin Impact until work starts again anyway.
Ashraf_mahdy OP t1_j2e6lpq wrote
Reply to comment by psychorameses in Incorporating Deep Learning into my MSc by Ashraf_mahdy
Can I dm you with more information maybe you're able to steer me in the right direction? If you're willing of course
I'm trying to do my due diligence before the start of the Module to be able to answer my teacher's questions effectively and know how deep I need to go
psychorameses t1_j2e63yf wrote
Reply to comment by Ashraf_mahdy in Incorporating Deep Learning into my MSc by Ashraf_mahdy
That distinction isn't real. In that regard, both techniques learn exactly the same thing: a best fit curve. The difference is how complicated that curve needs to be. Unless you are trying to do something specific like computer vision or natural language processing, you really don’t need DL. If you are working with simple tabular data, basic ML like linear regression will be more than enough.
In any case, the feedback for most ML projects is to start with a simple regression technique and only start complicating your models if you aren’t getting what you want. You’d be surprised to see how far a simple non-DL model gets you.
I worked in Zillow’s AI team so I know both AI and real estate analytics problems.
Ashraf_mahdy OP t1_j2cxj6e wrote
Reply to comment by enterthesun in Incorporating Deep Learning into my MSc by Ashraf_mahdy
Thank you! doing it now
Ashraf_mahdy OP t1_j2cxhvw wrote
Reply to comment by ragdoll438 in Incorporating Deep Learning into my MSc by Ashraf_mahdy
I use the term DL/ML/AI interchangeably so maybe I am mistaken in this regard.
However, I did research the difference between Statistical learning and ML and the idea is that statistical learning is about relations between variables whereas DL/ML is about learning from a "random" so to speak dataset. In my case one time events can affect the statistical learning outcomes, however I am planning a "fall-back" method of statistical learning as well if that makes sense
[deleted] t1_j2cawvj wrote
Reply to Incorporating Deep Learning into my MSc by Ashraf_mahdy
[removed]
ragdoll438 t1_j2bursi wrote
Reply to Incorporating Deep Learning into my MSc by Ashraf_mahdy
Why do you think your thesis has to involve deep learning? you should first focus on problem and not technic. DL is useful when you have millions of data points and in most of the use cases classical ML/statistical learning is enough
enterthesun t1_j2bhzx5 wrote
Reply to comment by enterthesun in Incorporating Deep Learning into my MSc by Ashraf_mahdy
I’ve worked in real estate, capital projects, facilities, utilities and energy, as a data scientist.
enterthesun t1_j2bhrku wrote
Reply to Incorporating Deep Learning into my MSc by Ashraf_mahdy
U can dm me
gelvis101 t1_j2asbrb wrote
Reply to Laptop for Machine Learning by sifarsafar
PaperSpace is good for ML too, just SSH into it from your laptop.
[deleted] t1_j2a8jfp wrote
Reply to comment by shreveportfixit in Laptop for Machine Learning by sifarsafar
[removed]
bacocololo t1_j2a8db2 wrote
Reply to comment by shreveportfixit in Laptop for Machine Learning by sifarsafar
For my project yes using tf2.0 for bilstm models
shreveportfixit t1_j2a7el7 wrote
Reply to comment by bacocololo in Laptop for Machine Learning by sifarsafar
Faster at machine learning?
ralphc t1_j2a17xo wrote
Reply to Laptop for Machine Learning by sifarsafar
What's your budget?
I have a Dell Alienware 15" laptop with a rtx 3080 Ti, 16 GB of GPU memory, that does well on deep learning, tensorflow etc.
With Windows 11 on it you can set up WSL 2 and run graphical Linux programs. CUDA has a WSL-specific setup to get to the GPU and the rest is easy to set up.
It looks like you can get one in the $2500-3000 range, that's why I asked about your budget.
ShadowStormDrift t1_j29wqlt wrote
Reply to Laptop for Machine Learning by sifarsafar
I have a Mac M1 Pro. Given to me by my work.
DO NOT. I REPEAT. DO NOT USE A MAC TO DO DEEP LEARNING.
You will not have a good time.
Their decision to go with their own architecture (One chip as CPU and GPU) has completely gimped them in this space.
Most popular DL frameworks ship with CUDA. Cuda is controlled by Nvidia. Native M1 chips are not compatible with CUDA.
This means by doing DL on a Mac you are locking yourself out of the entire DL ecosystem.
Additionally, they (Apple) are also highly restrictive upon what they do and do not allow on their eco system leading to a VERY restrictive development environment. Seriously, getting something like OpenRefine working on a Mac was not possible due to their stance of "Only authorized programs may be installed here". At the time of my attempt, OpenRefine, a highly popular framework for inspecting massive CSV files, was not authorized on the new Mac M1 series.
Sure they may eventually deign to authorize something as popular as OpenRefine... but frankly you will be better off getting actual work done instead of waiting for a company to realize that nobody is big enough to police the entirety of the internet.
Natalia_Moon t1_j29rxfy wrote
Reply to Laptop for Machine Learning by sifarsafar
You should use google colab or pay Amazon services
_-K1L4-_ t1_j28ogmu wrote
Reply to Laptop for Machine Learning by sifarsafar
Why not just use Google colab?
westeast1000 OP t1_j2pohki wrote
Reply to comment by Nerveregenerator in Any inspiring and engaging deep learning courses for beginners? by westeast1000
Understood