Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive

r3dl3g t1_j1v3r3w wrote

The EU is effectively a confederation, organized similarly to how the US was under the Articles of Confederation prior to the current Constitution, as well as to the CSA during the American Civil War.

Confederations are, outwardly, very similar to Federated nations (e.g. the US, Russia), but have significantly weaker central governments, and a lot more legislative and executive authority is given over to the component states. The pro of this is that your local governments have quite a bit of leeway with respect to how they function, but the con is that if there are problems that are too big for your local government to solve, they have to be solved at the level of the central government...which is a huge issue, because of how weak that central government is. This means that confederations are pretty weak in crisis situations, which of course is absolutely not what you want from a central government.

Again; the US tried this system of government, and it failed pretty catastrophically.

3

sighthoundman t1_j1v2hvl wrote

More accurately, the early Christians replaced the local solstice celebrations with Christmas when they were vying for the minds and souls of the population. (Addition: How can you compete with the local religion if your holidays aren't anywhere near as good?)

That's why in English we celebrate the Paschal Holy Day under the name of Eostre, the goddess of dawn. (And rebirth [spring], and fertility [hence eggs and bunnies].)

13

Philosophile42 t1_j1v0pps wrote

In the United States we have individual states that have their own laws, own governor, legislator, etc. but when we travel between states we all use the same money, and there are a set of laws that also apply to everyone, that individual states can’t overrule.

The EU is much like that. It generally creates a uniform currency and allows for easier travel between countries. It also helps regulate trade between countries.

3

Sunhammer01 t1_j1uyubf wrote

When we think of traditional colors certain times of the year, those are actually the colors of nature at that time. In the wintertime, the trees you do see are evergreens. The only colors you generally see are bright red berries from an assortment of trees and shrubs. In the spring, the pale flowers that first come up are the colors we associate with Easter and spring clothing. In the fall, the fields and trees and squashes, including pumpkins, are the colors we think about with thanksgiving.

Edit- to add, many will point out the historical roots of Christmas trees, but those were still generally based on what was available in nature.

2

Flair_Helper t1_j1uwrj9 wrote

Please read this entire message

Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):

Straightforward or factual queries are not allowed on ELI5. ELI5 is meant for simplifying complex concepts.

If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.

1

Flair_Helper t1_j1uwicl wrote

Please read this entire message

Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):

Questions about a business or a group's motivation are not allowed on ELI5. These are usually either straightforward, or known only to the organisations involved, leading to speculation (Rule 2).

If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.

1

Flair_Helper t1_j1uvubp wrote

Please read this entire message

Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):

Straightforward or factual queries are not allowed on ELI5. ELI5 is meant for simplifying complex concepts.

If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.

1

justaname45832 t1_j1uoezb wrote

I apologize if my response did not address your question or provide the information you were seeking. As a language model, I am trained to generate responses based on the information that is provided to me. If my response does not appear to be relevant or helpful, it may be because I was not provided with enough context or information to accurately address the question or issue.

If you have a specific question or issue that you would like help with, please provide more information and I will do my best to assist you. Please also keep in mind that I am a machine learning model and may not always have access to the most up-to-date information or be able to provide a response to every question.

I hope this helps to clarify the situation. Please don't hesitate to reach out if you have any further questions or concerns.

0

sterexx t1_j1uo18p wrote

My friend had an interesting job then at a major financial industry company. Lots of rollerblading through the offices with a radio receiver and a pair of scissors.

Around then wifi security was bad even if you did set a password (because it was probably still WEP*). Yet the convenience was too tempting for some employees. They’d bring in a router and plug it into their ethernet cable so they could have their own little rogue network in their cubicle.

So my friend would home in on these spots, cut the ethernet cable, and leave a note that they’ll be fired if caught doing this again

* Shoutout to my neighbors at the place I moved to in 2011 for still using WEP security. Our cable didn’t get set up for a week or two. Lifesaver

2

Antithesys t1_j1um4jl wrote

> There was no use case for a wireless router.

Well home wi-fi did exist. In 2002-ish my friend got an "antenna" that he attached to his laptop and we'd drive around the more affluent neighborhoods looking for wireless networks. No one who had wireless bothered to secure the network back then, and when we'd find one we'd go into the printer and make it print out various things ("help I'm stuck in the printer" or "YOU'RE FIRED"). Ah, youth.

4

Flair_Helper t1_j1um1dq wrote

Please read this entire message

Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):

Loaded questions, or ones based on a false premise, are not allowed on ELI5. A loaded question is one that posits a specific view of reality and asks for explanations that confirm it. These usually include the poster's own opinion and bias, but do not always - there is overlap between this and parts of Rule 2. Note that this specifically includes false premises.

If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.

1

explainlikeimfive-ModTeam t1_j1um0z8 wrote

Please read this entire message


Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):

  • Loaded questions, or ones based on a false premise, are not allowed on ELI5 (Rule 6).

If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.

1