Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive
Is_Rosen OP t1_j1v4azi wrote
Reply to comment by r3dl3g in ELI5 the EU and how it works by Is_Rosen
Wait, so are the EU nations individually weak or is the overarching EU weak?
CFDietCoke t1_j1v49q3 wrote
Not much. We have nuclear power already. Fission and fusion aren't all that different if you are just looking at them as power sources. Both have 0 carbon footprint. Both would be used to biol water to turn a steam turbine.
r3dl3g t1_j1v3r3w wrote
Reply to ELI5 the EU and how it works by Is_Rosen
The EU is effectively a confederation, organized similarly to how the US was under the Articles of Confederation prior to the current Constitution, as well as to the CSA during the American Civil War.
Confederations are, outwardly, very similar to Federated nations (e.g. the US, Russia), but have significantly weaker central governments, and a lot more legislative and executive authority is given over to the component states. The pro of this is that your local governments have quite a bit of leeway with respect to how they function, but the con is that if there are problems that are too big for your local government to solve, they have to be solved at the level of the central government...which is a huge issue, because of how weak that central government is. This means that confederations are pretty weak in crisis situations, which of course is absolutely not what you want from a central government.
Again; the US tried this system of government, and it failed pretty catastrophically.
sighthoundman t1_j1v2hvl wrote
Reply to comment by v0din in ELI5: Why green and red are the definitive Christmas colors? by P4rturi
More accurately, the early Christians replaced the local solstice celebrations with Christmas when they were vying for the minds and souls of the population. (Addition: How can you compete with the local religion if your holidays aren't anywhere near as good?)
That's why in English we celebrate the Paschal Holy Day under the name of Eostre, the goddess of dawn. (And rebirth [spring], and fertility [hence eggs and bunnies].)
Is_Rosen OP t1_j1v19kg wrote
Reply to comment by Philosophile42 in ELI5 the EU and how it works by Is_Rosen
This makes sense.
Is_Rosen OP t1_j1v17hv wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ELI5 the EU and how it works by Is_Rosen
Does the EU have problems managing itself? The last sentence makes me assume that.
Philosophile42 t1_j1v0pps wrote
Reply to ELI5 the EU and how it works by Is_Rosen
In the United States we have individual states that have their own laws, own governor, legislator, etc. but when we travel between states we all use the same money, and there are a set of laws that also apply to everyone, that individual states can’t overrule.
The EU is much like that. It generally creates a uniform currency and allows for easier travel between countries. It also helps regulate trade between countries.
[deleted] t1_j1v0k0r wrote
Reply to ELI5 the EU and how it works by Is_Rosen
[deleted]
Sunhammer01 t1_j1uyubf wrote
When we think of traditional colors certain times of the year, those are actually the colors of nature at that time. In the wintertime, the trees you do see are evergreens. The only colors you generally see are bright red berries from an assortment of trees and shrubs. In the spring, the pale flowers that first come up are the colors we associate with Easter and spring clothing. In the fall, the fields and trees and squashes, including pumpkins, are the colors we think about with thanksgiving.
Edit- to add, many will point out the historical roots of Christmas trees, but those were still generally based on what was available in nature.
Flair_Helper t1_j1uwrj9 wrote
Reply to ELI5: How do different humans like and dislike different food and drinks if we’re all the same biologically? by nathanthemidget123
Please read this entire message
Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
Straightforward or factual queries are not allowed on ELI5. ELI5 is meant for simplifying complex concepts.
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.
Flair_Helper t1_j1uwicl wrote
Reply to eli5 YouTube Dislike information. by yellowxstone
Please read this entire message
Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
Questions about a business or a group's motivation are not allowed on ELI5. These are usually either straightforward, or known only to the organisations involved, leading to speculation (Rule 2).
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.
Flair_Helper t1_j1uvubp wrote
Please read this entire message
Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
Straightforward or factual queries are not allowed on ELI5. ELI5 is meant for simplifying complex concepts.
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.
jontss t1_j1uubxe wrote
Reply to comment by justaname45832 in ELI5 Why wasn’t wireless and Bluetooth technology widespread 20 years ago? by SwimmingOx
My laptop about 18 years ago had both.
15 years ago I was sharing my dial up connection at home with wifi.
[deleted] t1_j1uthmt wrote
[removed]
Laerson123 t1_j1usjcf wrote
Reply to comment by ToBeatOrNotToBeat- in ELI5: Why green and red are the definitive Christmas colors? by P4rturi
No, that's a hoax. The popular depiction and tale of Santas came way before Coca Cola even existed: https://fakehistoryhunter.net/2021/12/03/coca-cola-did-not-create-santa/
https://www.stnicholascenter.org/who-is-st-nicholas/origin-of-santa
[deleted] t1_j1upc63 wrote
[removed]
justaname45832 t1_j1uoezb wrote
Reply to comment by Marlsfarp in ELI5 Why wasn’t wireless and Bluetooth technology widespread 20 years ago? by SwimmingOx
I apologize if my response did not address your question or provide the information you were seeking. As a language model, I am trained to generate responses based on the information that is provided to me. If my response does not appear to be relevant or helpful, it may be because I was not provided with enough context or information to accurately address the question or issue.
If you have a specific question or issue that you would like help with, please provide more information and I will do my best to assist you. Please also keep in mind that I am a machine learning model and may not always have access to the most up-to-date information or be able to provide a response to every question.
I hope this helps to clarify the situation. Please don't hesitate to reach out if you have any further questions or concerns.
Marlsfarp t1_j1uo4oh wrote
Reply to comment by justaname45832 in ELI5 Why wasn’t wireless and Bluetooth technology widespread 20 years ago? by SwimmingOx
Why is this clearly AI generated nonsense answer the top comment?
sterexx t1_j1uo18p wrote
Reply to comment by Antithesys in ELI5 Why wasn’t wireless and Bluetooth technology widespread 20 years ago? by SwimmingOx
My friend had an interesting job then at a major financial industry company. Lots of rollerblading through the offices with a radio receiver and a pair of scissors.
Around then wifi security was bad even if you did set a password (because it was probably still WEP*). Yet the convenience was too tempting for some employees. They’d bring in a router and plug it into their ethernet cable so they could have their own little rogue network in their cubicle.
So my friend would home in on these spots, cut the ethernet cable, and leave a note that they’ll be fired if caught doing this again
* Shoutout to my neighbors at the place I moved to in 2011 for still using WEP security. Our cable didn’t get set up for a week or two. Lifesaver
Lithuim t1_j1umf4c wrote
Reply to comment by Antithesys in ELI5 Why wasn’t wireless and Bluetooth technology widespread 20 years ago? by SwimmingOx
Fancy pants richers with their DSL modems.
Antithesys t1_j1um4jl wrote
Reply to comment by Lithuim in ELI5 Why wasn’t wireless and Bluetooth technology widespread 20 years ago? by SwimmingOx
> There was no use case for a wireless router.
Well home wi-fi did exist. In 2002-ish my friend got an "antenna" that he attached to his laptop and we'd drive around the more affluent neighborhoods looking for wireless networks. No one who had wireless bothered to secure the network back then, and when we'd find one we'd go into the printer and make it print out various things ("help I'm stuck in the printer" or "YOU'RE FIRED"). Ah, youth.
Flair_Helper t1_j1um1dq wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why Napoleon was unstoppable and literally destroyed all countries? by Wild-Discount-1990
Please read this entire message
Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
Loaded questions, or ones based on a false premise, are not allowed on ELI5. A loaded question is one that posits a specific view of reality and asks for explanations that confirm it. These usually include the poster's own opinion and bias, but do not always - there is overlap between this and parts of Rule 2. Note that this specifically includes false premises.
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.
explainlikeimfive-ModTeam t1_j1um0z8 wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why Napoleon was unstoppable and literally destroyed all countries? by Wild-Discount-1990
Please read this entire message
Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
- Loaded questions, or ones based on a false premise, are not allowed on ELI5 (Rule 6).
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.
Polymathy1 t1_j1ukwmu wrote
Honestly, the connection quality on BT devices is garbage now vs in 2005. The tech evolved, but not necessarily in a great way.
It wasn't common because interfaces people used every day were established and analog. Cars had tape players and a BT stereo was a wild.
[deleted] t1_j1v4b3f wrote
Reply to ELI5 what would energy from nuclear fusion mean for humanity? by odyssey92
[removed]