Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive
[deleted] t1_j2894r6 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j288x64 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j288v92 wrote
greatdrams23 t1_j288q8e wrote
Reply to eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
The clue is in the question. If they were accurate, they would be used in every single criminal case.
tranquil45 t1_j288paq wrote
If I remember.correctly, it was because his momentum had already been shot. Had he won by 50 points, im sure it would have been covered differently.
“Joementum”
FailureToReason t1_j288njg wrote
Reply to comment by allthejokesareblue in eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
Absolutely, but let's not ignore that large part of criminal investigation is 'gut feel' and instinct, and both the polygraph and body language are useful for what they are useful for, but neither is valuable as incriminating evidence. There have been plenty of people who acted guilty as sin but were completely innocent, and plenty of psychopaths who seemed completely innocent until a compelling piece of evidence blew the investigation open.
Aussie_Mo_Bro t1_j288lxp wrote
Reply to eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
They are equivocally, with no shred of a doubt
#not
accurate.
Not only that, they can easily be fooled. Like, stupidly easily.
They need to measure a "baseline" to get your "at rest" heartrate, breathing, body temperature, etc. Just hold your breath for a bit, this can fool the baseline.
Fun fact:
William Moulton Marston invented the polygraph test.
He and his wife created Wonder Woman.
[deleted] t1_j2884jp wrote
Musicman1972 t1_j287bsc wrote
Reply to comment by NemesisSenpai in eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
You would if you're sitting in a police station with detectives saying they think you did it and you will go down for 20 years.
That scenario wouldn't make you nervous?
Do you know who it wouldn't make nervous? A sociopath with zero feelings.
I don't like the machine that thinks stress == guilt.
FailureToReason t1_j2878ir wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
See my other comments in this thread for why they don't.
FailureToReason t1_j2876s4 wrote
Reply to comment by NemesisSenpai in eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
Except that it doesnt work like that. What if you're nervous not about the questions relating to a crime, but simply the fact that you're jammed in a small, bright room with cops who accusing you of a crime? Or what if you're nervous that they might get a bad reading and think you're lying when you're telling the truth? What if you clench your anus at the wrong moment? I guarantee you an innocent person is going to be plenty nervous and stressed going into a polygraph, and that's exactly what the polygraph is trying to measure.
mayners t1_j28754f wrote
Reply to comment by adept-grumblefish28 in eli5; how does the stock exchange work? by dirtycumsock69420914
I'd add to this that people don't always get a share of the profits, known as dividends, only certain companies pay out dividends.
And also the price is partly affected by things like the estimated value of a company both now and down the line in a few years. Things like good news of expansion or new products will help the price while bad news like recession or increased fuel prices will reduce the price.
For example during covid most companies went down in price because they weren't allowed to open, while PPE companies increased because of both being allowed to operate and increase in demand.
Mammoth-Mud-9609 t1_j2874jd wrote
Reply to eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
They aren't even slightly accurate let alone highly, the only use they have is an interrogation tool for suspects who don't know how useless they are.
[deleted] t1_j286x3f wrote
allthejokesareblue t1_j285z9y wrote
Reply to comment by FailureToReason in eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
>by body language
Which is also highly inaccurate
JediSwaggins t1_j285xc3 wrote
Reply to comment by FailureToReason in eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
Just gonna write all this down, thanks
Treviathan88 t1_j285fcz wrote
Reply to eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
Polygraphs as "lie detectors" are not accurate at all. They don't measure truthfulness in any way, only physiology. And while the two might be very loosely related, it's a logical fallacy. Correlation does not equal causation.
S0upOfTheDay t1_j285b5a wrote
Company ask 4 money, people give money in hopes they get more money, if company is good with the money they gave them, they could get 90% or 110% back in a day or 700% back in 60 years.
mrwho2019 t1_j28597n wrote
Reply to eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
It's called a polygraph, not a lie-detector test.
Scientifically they are highly inaccurate.
The test and the results can be affected by a number of factors.
FailureToReason t1_j2857l7 wrote
Reply to eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
Short answer: they're not accurate, can be easily fooled, and are basically inadmissible because they have a very weak scientific foundation
What they ARE good for, is manipulation. You swear up and down you didn't kill your wife. Detective asks, 'would you take a polygraph?' And you start sweating bullets. You complete the polygraph, and the polygrapher comes in and tells you 'I know you lied to me.' And maybe they do, or are at least suspicous because of your body language or evidence that contradicts you. But in that moment, under that pressure, people crack.. The cop may have absolutely nothing, and is just fondling in the dark. 'I know you lied on some of these questions.' Next thing you're confessing to a triple homicide that you may never have been caught for.
Edit: body language isn't necrssarily evidence, corrected the phrasing there.
[deleted] t1_j2856u9 wrote
DrMcDingus t1_j2852j5 wrote
Reply to comment by NemesisSenpai in eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
Would you not be nervous about failing? Have you never done anything wrong? All people have, maybe not the same wrong the police is asking about.
Lie detectors are pseudoscience and have no place in a justice system.
NameUnavail t1_j2851i3 wrote
Reply to comment by NemesisSenpai in eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
Yes because the justice system has famously never done something like coerce a confession, or falsely sentence someone.
No need at all for an innocent person to be nervous in a police interview.
sim_kay t1_j28512y wrote
Reply to comment by NemesisSenpai in eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
Yeah, that's highly unlikely.. Who wouldn't be nervous when interrogated by the police, even if you did nothing wrong? And than on the other hand there are sociopaths and psychopaths who are absolutely calm even if they murdered anyone. What would you do with them? Don't convict them because of the test?
Feisty-Monitor3426 t1_j289b0c wrote
Reply to ELI5: Alzheimer's is dementia, but not all dementia is Alzheimer's. So what is the difference? by degobrah
Dementia is a group of diseases that effect your memory Alzheimer’s is a disease within the group of dementia it’s like cancer there’s different kinds all called cancer but not every kind of cancer is lung cancer