Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive
Mumblerumble t1_j28otdt wrote
Reply to eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
In short, they’re not accurate. They show whether your body displays signs of being anxious.
A_Garbage_Truck t1_j28orys wrote
Reply to comment by Derikoopa in eli5: Why couldn't a country in debt mint a coin of immense value and use it to pay off the debt? by Derikoopa
the coin itself is not important if its not backed up by either its value in some other commodity(like gold, when the gold standard was still a thing) or the promise of economic staiblity of the entitiy issuing the coin(essentially guaranteeing you at you can at any time exchange said coin for its value on the respective currency)
the1st requires that you actually have said commodity in stock ready ot exchange, whiel the latter requires that your nation has the economic might to be good on this promise else i will not trust that coin.
Spiritual_Jaguar4685 t1_j28oqfz wrote
Reply to ELI5: By using Medical Science, we are practically denying natural selection. How can it affect us in the future? by No_Victory_1611
In some ways yes. Humanity has largely left natural selection behind.
How do we define "huge catastrophe"? Something like COVID probably applies and that was probably a wake up call to our fragility. Thankfully vaccines and social measures muted the worst of it, but we still a massive die-off of the old, immune compromised, and genetically unlucky.
I would argue it's less humans we should be worried about and rather things like our crops. If you research monocultures you'll get my point. Humans still have a tremendous amount of genetic diversity, it's unlikely a single plague lets say will wipe us out 100%. But most our major crops are essentially clones of each other. If there arises a COVID for wheat, then yes, if it kills one plant it can potentially eradicate wheat from existence. Look up the Gros Michele banana for information there. That should be a major concern for the future of humanity and something we strive to improve upon.
homeboi808 t1_j28ohws wrote
Reply to comment by MacaroonElectronic68 in eli5; how does the stock exchange work? by dirtycumsock69420914
Just to note, not all stocks pay dividends. For instance, Apple does but Amazon does not.
WinterOkami666 t1_j28oh4f wrote
Reply to comment by OldTimeyMedicine in eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
I was going to make a joke about how we should just have court on TV and air it during the middle of the day as entertainment programming... and then I got depressed when I realized.
Luckbot t1_j28oehj wrote
Reply to comment by dogmeatjones25 in ELi5: who was Karl Marx and what were his theories? by Foddor088outside
>Marx believed that there should be a revolution
Slight correction:
Marx believed that there inevitably MUST be a proletarian revolution as logical next step after the bourgeois revolution (french revolution and later the 1848 springtime of nations) kicked out the aristocracy. He thought it was a natural law that this second revolution would eventually come when the proletariat that originally supported the liberal revolution realized that they didn't gain anything from it yet.
Spiritual_Jaguar4685 t1_j28o3t9 wrote
Great synopsis by u/dogmeatjones25
I'll just add that Marx lived in the mid-1800s, in Germany, and was very influenced by the Industrial Revolution and economics and politics of his day. His theory shouldn't be taken as "all Communism" any more than the Founding Fathers of the United States should be equated to "all Democracy".
His ideas though, which you can better call "Marxism" or "Marxist Communism" where the germ that grew into 20th century into things like Leninism, Stalinism, and the communism we saw in Soviet Russia and modern day China. It's not fair to say that modern day China is "Marxist" or to equate things like Socialism or Soviet Russia to Marx either.
DavidRFZ t1_j28nyg2 wrote
Reply to comment by yalloc in eli5: Why couldn't a country in debt mint a coin of immense value and use it to pay off the debt? by Derikoopa
I was under the impressions that the “trillion dollar coin” proposal was an accounting trick to try to get around the artificial “debt limit” that Congress imposes on itself.
There have been structural budget deficits for over twenty years, so every couple of years the debt limit is raised.
Every so often, a group of newly-elected House members decides they are going to engage in brinksmanship with raising this limit — not fully comprehending the global financial meltdown that would occur if the government actually defaulted on its debt. In the end, the debt limit is ALWAYS raised. There is no other option.
So, people get annoyed with this game and try to find ways to render the “debt limit” meaningless. You could pass a law eliminating the debt limit! But if you don’t have the votes for that you get creative.
This old proposal was for the treasury to mint an trillion dollar coin and then deposit it in the Federal Reserve. It is not circulated. I don’t think something like that could even be “spent” (anyone got change for a trillion?). But in accounting terms it would count as an asset which would keep us below the “debt limit”. The government wouldn’t default. Brinksmanship by newly-elected Congressmembers is no longer a thing.
They’ll never do it though. It sounds too insane and “it’s just an accounting trick” is not an explanation that would sit well with potentially horrified voters.
homeboi808 t1_j28nx62 wrote
The stock exchange is where companies willing to publicly sell off ownership of their companies do such trades (they have to be approved of course, and follow a lot of regulations). In America the 2 largest ones are the New York Stock Exchange located on Wall Street, and the NASDAQ which is digital.
These pieces of ownership, shares, sometimes allow you to have voting rights as well as receive profits, dividends, which are in-line with the % of the company that you own. Now, not all shares come with either/both, so just do some research (you can just Google: “Does Apple stock pay dividends?”). You could cash out these dividends, but since it usually is a few pennies/bucks for most people, they instead choose to opt-in/enable a feature called Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP), where they money is instead used to buy more shares of that company, that way you earn more shares and also earn more dividends, and this repeats and repeats (you could do this all manually especially since nowadays it is commission free and fractional shares can be bought; it used to be much more appealing before this, as now you could take the money and buy fractional shares in another company if you wish).
A broker is a person/app that handles the transactions (think Leonardo DiCaprio in Wolf of Wall Street); you yourself can’t just walk up to the NY Stock Exchange on Wall Street and do business). Historically brokers have charged commission fees but now most are free (they make money from offering other services, such as financial advising, they also require the money you wish to use to make purchases to be in their fund for them to invest in, rather than just charging your bank account).
dogmeatjones25 t1_j28m5d5 wrote
Karl Marx was a philosopher who lived a long time ago.
Marx believed that there were two main groups of people in society: the bourgeoisie, who owned the businesses and factories, and the proletariat, who worked for them. He thought that the bourgeoisie were always trying to make more money and get ahead, even if it meant exploiting the proletariat and keeping them poor.
Marx believed that there should be a revolution, where the proletariat would rise up and take control of the businesses and factories, so that everyone could work together and share the wealth more equally. This idea is called communism.
Hitchie_Rawtin t1_j28lvte wrote
Reply to comment by NemesisSenpai in eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
It's extremely common for people to feel nervous when going through airport security despite doing absolutely nothing wrong, you think people wouldn't feel nervous while being interrogated for a serious crime by a cop whose questions are presuming your guilt?
[deleted] t1_j28lu1j wrote
[removed]
Fred2718 t1_j28l5hy wrote
Reply to comment by Aussie_Mo_Bro in eli5: If Lie Detector tests are highly accurate, why are they not used in court? by NemesisSenpai
So...forget the polygraph. I want to be interrogated with the Lasso of Truth!
Meme-Dozer OP t1_j28jvpy wrote
Reply to comment by DylanCO in ELI5 Are money slowing us down from being a multiplanetary species? by Meme-Dozer
Sometimes words can’t describe our thoughts , plus English isn’t my main language.
Meme-Dozer OP t1_j28jmxu wrote
Reply to comment by RockyMtnBullTesties in ELI5 Are money slowing us down from being a multiplanetary species? by Meme-Dozer
We already created space probes that destroyed asteroids and even collected samples , the resources we gathered from the asteroids could be used to build more drones and probes , the first and second ones would probably be nearby earth asteroids and the cycle keeps on going.
AdditionalRabbit4516 t1_j28jhq8 wrote
Reply to comment by tacogamer20 in ELI5: Alzheimer's is dementia, but not all dementia is Alzheimer's. So what is the difference? by degobrah
That’s why I said “related” and not “caused by,” since we don’t know the exact causal mechanism. But beta amyloid PET imaging is used to make Alzheimer’s diagnoses because levels do correspond to severity, for the most part. I work in neurology research.
Edit: also the article you’re referencing really only proved one lab was completely corrupt and shady. There are DOZENS of other b amyloid labs (and subtypes) and quite literally HUNDREDS of preclinical studies whose b amyloid work is supported, which is why clinical trials keep going that direction. Unfortunately they fail. There isn’t some big conspiracy to NOT cure AD. The Science article claiming otherwise was really really sensationalist. But I agree we don’t have a handle on it right now, and other therapeutics are needed.
RockyMtnBullTesties t1_j28jc75 wrote
Reply to comment by Meme-Dozer in ELI5 Are money slowing us down from being a multiplanetary species? by Meme-Dozer
Yea but we need resources in order to create the tech that gets us to moons and asteroids and the tech to mine those moons and asteroids. And our resources here are limited.
tiredstars t1_j28iypj wrote
Reply to comment by Derikoopa in eli5: Why couldn't a country in debt mint a coin of immense value and use it to pay off the debt? by Derikoopa
Also it is possible for the government to create this money, then take it out of circulation. It produces a billion dollar coin, and then raises taxes (but not spending) by a billion dollars.
Of course, if you pay me $1bn for my debt, then immediately hit me with a $1bn tax, I'm not going to be very happy.
Loonidoc t1_j28iwzd wrote
Reply to comment by Harrison_Phera in ELI5: Alzheimer's is dementia, but not all dementia is Alzheimer's. So what is the difference? by degobrah
you had that backwards - squares are a specific type of rectangle where all the sides are equal. And so Alzheimer's would be the "square" in your analogy
Meme-Dozer OP t1_j28hky3 wrote
Reply to comment by RockyMtnBullTesties in ELI5 Are money slowing us down from being a multiplanetary species? by Meme-Dozer
I mean , they don’t have to worry about resources , if they were just able to mine from asteroids or the solar system. We could have drones , bases to make it automatic. Resources wouldn’t be a worry , if we could just stop mining on earth, I just don’t get why stuck in a bubble and not expand.
[deleted] t1_j28hdxv wrote
Reply to comment by RockyMtnBullTesties in ELI5 Are money slowing us down from being a multiplanetary species? by Meme-Dozer
[deleted]
Flair_Helper t1_j28hc6w wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why are medical doctors commonly referred to as "doctors" over other types of doctors? by whatwouldultralorddo
Please read this entire message
Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
Subjective or speculative replies are not allowed on ELI5. Only objective explanations are permitted here; your question is asking for speculation or subjective responses. This includes anything asking for peoples' subjective opinions, any kind of discussion, and anything where we would have to speculate on the answer. This very much includes asking about motivations of people or companies. This includes Just-so stories.
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.
DylanCO t1_j28h3ek wrote
Read this back to yourself slowly, think about it, and repost in the morning. Or just send it to your English teacher and have them tell you whats wrong with it.
Flair_Helper t1_j28gz81 wrote
Please read this entire message
Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
Discussion of religious or political beliefs are not allowed on ELI5. These usually end up being discussions rather than requests for simplifying complex concepts. They also tend to have a large subjective bent.
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.
RockyMtnBullTesties t1_j28ourg wrote
Reply to comment by Meme-Dozer in ELI5 Are money slowing us down from being a multiplanetary species? by Meme-Dozer
Collecting samples is VERY different from mining for resources. The tech may be related but it’s like digging a hole with a garden spade vs a mechanical backhoe. A lot of money/development needs to go into that and our governments choose to use that money elsewhere instead. That’s not to say it won’t ever happen. We’re closer than ever. But I don’t think it’s going to happen anytime soon.