Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive
[deleted] t1_j2dklaq wrote
Reply to comment by Jkarofwild in ELI5: How did we realise the mind is in the brain? by theembryo
[deleted]
cyanrarroll t1_j2dkhz2 wrote
All comments forget the most important aspect: Any unspent dollar at the end of the year is profit, and profits are taxed
mangoandsushi t1_j2dkhsd wrote
Don't you just feel it? I have always been aware of my head being crucial to my thinking and I should protect it more than anything else.
Jkarofwild t1_j2dkevh wrote
Reply to comment by tommytraddles in ELI5: How did we realise the mind is in the brain? by theembryo
It's not the case that everyone everywhere everywhen has exposure to a corpus of knowledge about head injuries. Hence why some people went with "when I'm embarrassed/infatuated/etc I feel it in my 'heart', that must be where thinking happens".
tashkiira t1_j2dkepo wrote
Reply to comment by Splashfooz in ELI5: How did we realise the mind is in the brain? by theembryo
Considering the average age of a sufferer of penile fracture is under 30, you might want to consider how 'senile' the victims are.
lifesoidot t1_j2dkd07 wrote
Reply to comment by pr3dato8 in ELI5: How did we realise the mind is in the brain? by theembryo
Nah, my head is not that interesting.
FormallyKnownAsKabr t1_j2dkcyn wrote
Reply to comment by jswansong in Eli5 How exactly does Noise cancellation work? That too in such small airbuds by Professional-Ad3441
Also active noise canceling does not block sound and can still cause hearing damage
lifesoidot t1_j2dkad6 wrote
Reply to comment by Nelewout in ELI5: How did we realise the mind is in the brain? by theembryo
Ok, so I am actually a dog, but I was hoping to still fly under the radar because humans can technically fracture their dingledong. It’s just not a bony dingledong.
Jkarofwild t1_j2dk45d wrote
Reply to comment by 54yroldHOTMOM in ELI5: How did we realise the mind is in the brain? by theembryo
That question is one of the ones philosophy is all about.
throwaway8u3sH0 t1_j2dk437 wrote
Reply to comment by wiskey_straight86 in ELI5: What makes the rust on a rusty nail different from the rust on shaving razors to where one needs an immediate tetanus shot and the other happens daily by DrySyllabub2563
I thought this was the other way to use a poop knife.
[deleted] t1_j2dk3dl wrote
[removed]
Implausibilibuddy t1_j2dk2br wrote
Reply to comment by GanondalfTheWhite in Eli5 How exactly does Noise cancellation work? That too in such small airbuds by Professional-Ad3441
It is quick but not instant which is why active noise cancellation works well on low frequencies and not too well for higher.
Low frequency sounds have a wider wavelength (and thus occur over a longer period of time). You can have a little latency between the live and generated sounds and they will still mostly overlap and cancel out. For high frequency sounds there could be several peaks and troughs in the offset gap and they're less likely to line up with the generated sound.
Ratnix t1_j2dk1uo wrote
Because, if one department isn't spending all of their allocated budget, they means they don't need the amount allocated to them. And if they don't need it, some other department surely can use it because they didn't have enough allocated to them.
So department's try to spend their entire allocation so that when they actually do need it, it'll be there.
You don't need the money, right up until you do. And when you do need it, if you don't have that allocation to your department, you're SOL, you'll have to try to get it for next year's/quarterly budget.
Spending it just tells the people who make the budget that you do in fact need the amount allocated to you and to not give some of it to someone else.
snoopervisor t1_j2dk0hh wrote
Reply to comment by plantito101 in Eli5 How exactly does Noise cancellation work? That too in such small airbuds by Professional-Ad3441
Sound is air pressure changes. The canceling means the pressure is flattened. It's substracting two sound waves.
demanbmore t1_j2djtyf wrote
Reply to ELI5: If I were to eat a thousand Snickers bars, I would put on significantly more weight than if I were to eat a thousand heads of cabbage despite the huge disparity in weight of the pre-consumed food. Where does this mass come from? by marcuschookt
Add a third item for comparison - a 1 kg bottle of water. That weighs more than either the Snickers bar or cabbage, but it's clear why you won't gain any weight from drinking the water (assuming you weren't dehydrated and you've had a chance to piss it out) - there's nothing in the water your body can use for energy now or convert to something it can store and use for energy later. The water just passes through you.
The bulk of the cabbage passes through you too because it's over 90% water. Most of the rest is insoluble fiber that just passes through our digestive system unused. Take away the water and the insoluble fiber, and you're left with a tiny bit of actual usable nutrients, and only some of that is potentially storable by the body.
A Snickers bar is about 6% water, and the bulk of the remaining 94% is calorie dense fat and carbohydrates (with a bit of protein). The body uses some of that for immediate energy and stores almost all of the rest, resulting in weight gain.
This is the general reason why vegetables seldom lead to weight gain - they're mostly water and whatever is left isn't terribly calorie dense(ignoring starchy veggies like potatoes and fatty veggies like avocado for the moment). Doesn't mean you can't gain weight eating only veggies, but it's much harder to do compared to eating more calorically-dense foods.
Splashfooz t1_j2djtvd wrote
Reply to comment by tashkiira in ELI5: How did we realise the mind is in the brain? by theembryo
'senile fracture'
Ganeshadream t1_j2djtj5 wrote
Reply to Eli5 How exactly does Noise cancellation work? That too in such small airbuds by Professional-Ad3441
Immagine a still lake. You throw a pebble in the water. Ripple spread out. Then quickly throw another pebble near by. It too makes ripple. Where the first p bibles ripples encountered the second ripples they kinda cancel each other out.
frzx1 t1_j2djr04 wrote
Reply to comment by GanondalfTheWhite in Eli5 How exactly does Noise cancellation work? That too in such small airbuds by Professional-Ad3441
There's a lot that goes into noise cancelling, they are not always doing everything in real time. There are specially designed and fully dedicated chips on the sound devices that do just one thing, noise cancelling. They recognize certain sounds and apply the noise cancelling beforehand, thus eliminating that time window. They've been trained on millions of hours of noise and have gotten really good at what they do. Power of data, indeed.
Slammedtgs t1_j2djl58 wrote
Reply to comment by Gladianton in ELI5: Tech billionaires lost $400 billion this year. Where does it go? Does anyone gain? by ChickenEnthusiast
It would only be a realized loss if they bought it for more than they sold it.
drafterman t1_j2djjd8 wrote
Reply to comment by mytrickytrick in ELI5 why do people refer to it as the pacific northwest rather than simply the northwest? by Longshot_Louie
Because town names are usually a local consideration, whereas a large geographical chunk of an entire nation is a national consideration.
I mean, you would agree that we wouldn't ever give two states the same name, right?
SilentHunter7 t1_j2dji9w wrote
Reply to comment by starnutq163 in Eli5 How exactly does Noise cancellation work? That too in such small airbuds by Professional-Ad3441
Superposition is a fancy way of saying the whole is equal to the sum of its parts.
If you add two waves, the amplitude of the resulting wave at any point is the sum of both the original waves at the point.
So if wave 1 is sin(x)
And wave 2 is -sin(x)
The two combined give us sin(x) - sin(x) = 0
That's how noise cancelling works.
Note that superposition only works in linear systems. Sound is linear, electromagnetic waves are linear, electric circuits using only linear components (Resistors, Inductors, Capacitors) are linear, etc.
Linearity is definitely beyond an ELI5 discussion though, I think.
frzx1 t1_j2djei4 wrote
Reply to comment by chipdipmcgillicuddy in Eli5 How exactly does Noise cancellation work? That too in such small airbuds by Professional-Ad3441
In my opinion, bad noise cancelling is worse than no noise cancelling at all. Yes, when the noise cancelling isn't that good and responsive, there are moments of noticeable white noise. But with time, brands have gotten really good at noise cancelling and the manufacturers claiming to have noise cancelling in them do their job well.
mikesteane t1_j2dj9ac wrote
Reply to comment by antilos_weorsick in ELI5: Angles in a semicircle by [deleted]
Maybe you can't see it, but I can.
I started with a triangle in a semi-circle as requested by OP and did not assume it was a right-angled triangle. However when completing the construction as I described, it is clear (to me at least) that it can only have been a right angle to start with. I filled out a couple of extra steps to help you complete the visualisation, but it seems you need the formal algebra. Maybe OP still needs the proof, but to me it is so obvious as not to need formal proof.
FenderMoon t1_j2dj4u7 wrote
Reply to comment by DMRexy in ELI5 Why aren't we curing more degenerative diseases with stem cell research? by KaishiXYZ
Makes me wish we could have that sense of urgency about things more often. Usually we get so wound up with red tape that we drag things out for years before they ever even see the light of day.
[deleted] t1_j2dkp1c wrote
Reply to ELI5: How do they take an MRI of a heart when it's still pumping, and therefore moving? by Vespiri2d
[removed]