Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive
angrybird7677 OP t1_j2dr94j wrote
Reply to comment by cyanrarroll in ELI5: Why do companies require annual budget be spent 100%? by angrybird7677
I don't think so.... How can unspent dollar from budgeting be treated as this year's profits? Profit is the amount gained from gross revenue less expenses. If I did not sell an item, how can the saved amount from expenditure be treated as profit? And doesn't this budgeted fund come from previous years earnings? So those would have been taxed before previously. If they taxed it again wouldn't it be double taxing?
Potato_Octopi t1_j2dr8sk wrote
Reply to comment by cyanrarroll in ELI5: Why do companies require annual budget be spent 100%? by angrybird7677
What difference does that make?
Potato_Octopi t1_j2dr5b1 wrote
Reply to comment by angrybird7677 in ELI5: Why do companies require annual budget be spent 100%? by angrybird7677
Storing money in a coffer isn't an inherent good. You should either be improving the company with that cash or returning it to shareholders.
If you let cash pile up the business with either issue a dividend, share buyback or make an acquisition, etc.
tifloh t1_j2dr3vf wrote
Reply to comment by sterlingphoenix in ELI5: How do we get such detailed pictures of planets and space? by thegoodnamesRtaken9
Thank you for the detailed explanation. I am trying to understand how scientists can be certain that the light they capture, especially from objects that are thousands/millions of light years away that the light is indeed from those objects and is not contaminated by other light? Again, kindly eli5!
druppolo t1_j2dr23i wrote
Reply to comment by Tounsk in ELI5 Why aren't we curing more degenerative diseases with stem cell research? by KaishiXYZ
Can you explain the cancer part? I recall that’s why it is way easier to use them on animals as the cancer risk is “less of a problem”.
I’m pretty curious, if you have the time, I thank you a lot.
zap_p25 t1_j2dqx8y wrote
Reply to comment by MyMomSaysIAmCool in Eli5 How exactly does Noise cancellation work? That too in such small airbuds by Professional-Ad3441
Those are a bit different. They don’t use active noise cancellation. They just use the limits of the audio amplification circuitry. Essentially sounds above a certain threshold just don’t get amplified and the passive noise reduction does it’s thing.
carcigenicate t1_j2dqupv wrote
Reply to comment by extacy1375 in Eli5: Why when you yawn your hearing goes down? by Big_carrot_69
Apparently. Ya, I can do that too.
provocative_bear t1_j2dqp1m wrote
It came from observing changes in personality following head injury. Phineas Gage from the 1800s is the classical example. He had an iron rod go through his head while working on a railroad. He survived but his personality changed dramatically (he was no longer polite and inhibited as he was before, the accounts don’t seem to go into detail but the observers were clearly shocked by what they saw).
PofanWasTaken t1_j2dqm1j wrote
Reply to comment by Pocok5 in ELI5: What makes the rust on a rusty nail different from the rust on shaving razors to where one needs an immediate tetanus shot and the other happens daily by DrySyllabub2563
No cure for blunt force trauma eh?
Thanks for the insight
angrybird7677 OP t1_j2dqijr wrote
Reply to comment by sass-pancake in ELI5: Why do companies require annual budget be spent 100%? by angrybird7677
>. If the business owner sees one department consistently not spending their full budget, they think that department doesn’t need that budget
This kind of thinking is prevalent in my company too (a project manager told me the exact same thing), but isn't it mind boggling they will think like this? Why don't they ask the dept why? Perhaps they were really able to help the company save money? There should be a policy that saved monies can be carried over to future years which the dept can draw from in case of real emergency.
Just imagine the amount each company can save if everyone adopts a cost savings attitude
DeadFyre t1_j2dqe3w wrote
Reply to comment by ivthreadp110 in ELI5: What makes the rust on a rusty nail different from the rust on shaving razors to where one needs an immediate tetanus shot and the other happens daily by DrySyllabub2563
Specifically, the bacteria Clostridium tetani. It's a benign bacteria which lives in the soil, or in the gut of animals. It's just that inside the bloodstream, in hypoxic conditions, they can produce a toxin.
[deleted] t1_j2dqcdj wrote
[deleted]
Economics_Troll t1_j2dq7qc wrote
Reply to comment by ChickenEnthusiast in ELI5: Tech billionaires lost $400 billion this year. Where does it go? Does anyone gain? by ChickenEnthusiast
Rich people (in general) rarely hold substantial sums of cash.
Cash gains you nothing, and actually loses value year to year due to inflation.
Even investing in bonds gets you 5% + annual returns right now, and if you're using leverage in new businesses you can see returns substantially above that with more risk.
This is where the "rich gets richer" theme comes from. If you've got $10 million, you can earn $500k per year (5% return) in a very low risk way. Once you have enough money, you can fund your lifestyle without touching your original money or working.
fastolfe00 t1_j2dq6e1 wrote
Reply to ELI5. Why is honey and lemon a popular cure for cold like symptoms. What makes lemon more effective than say an orange or lime? by alexkid_in_realworld
>ELI5. Why is honey and lemon a popular cure for cold like symptoms.
Because people believe it is a cure, and this belief passes through the population as a meme.
People see demand for products containing these ingredients, and so they make them in order to profit from their sale. The presence of these products in stores reinforces the belief that they do something, and so the meme perpetuates.
People looking for validation that the products work will try the product, and then will feel better, and will conclude that the product caused them to feel better even if they would have gotten better anyway. This also reinforces the belief.
We also have a compulsion to share our knowledge with others, even if that knowledge is wrong. So anytime you ask a question like this on social media you'll find many people convinced of their beliefs who sound very authoritative telling you about the benefits of things like raw honey, lemon juice, or that magical fluid vinegar. This also perpetuates the belief.
There is evidence that a vitamin C deficiency hurts your ability to recover from illnesses. It's very hard to be vitamin C deficient unless you're on a pirate ship for a year, so vitamin C supplementation is almost always pointless. You'll just pee it out. Your doctor can tell you if you are deficient in vitamin C.
In other words, there's no actual evidence that any of these home remedies actually do anything aside from the placebo effect.
But it's also relatively harmless, and if you're drinking fluids or eating soup in order to get that bonus vitamin C or whatever the remedy is that you're taking, you're getting fluids. It's important to be hydrated when you're sick so that your immune system has access to all of your body's waterways to fight off the infection. So even if putting lemon juice or honey in your water doesn't help you directly, if it encourages you to drink more water, and reduces your stress, it's still helpful. This is why your doctor may still encourage you to try things like this at home. It makes you feel better feeling like you have some control over your own recovery even if you don't and you're getting fluids, which really is what your body needs.
DMRexy t1_j2dpxzv wrote
Reply to comment by FenderMoon in ELI5 Why aren't we curing more degenerative diseases with stem cell research? by KaishiXYZ
While I see where you're coming from, I kind of hope we never need that sense of urgency again haha
angrybird7677 OP t1_j2dpunj wrote
Reply to comment by DirtyThunderer in ELI5: Why do companies require annual budget be spent 100%? by angrybird7677
This is what's infuriating and confusing to me. If a typical family spends their budget like how a company does, there would be much less $$$ saved annually, just because we need to spend every single cent annually. I just don't understand why a company don't see savings can be stored in the coffers for future rainy days.
SirTruffleberry t1_j2dpqw8 wrote
Reply to comment by 54yroldHOTMOM in ELI5: How did we realise the mind is in the brain? by theembryo
I don't think it reduces the quality or scope of philosophy if one doesn't assume a soul/immaterial mind.
Assuming unnecessary things to explain phenomena does, on the other hand, usually have negative consequences. Every one of your postulates is like a filter through which the truth must pass. More/stronger filters means it's more likely that the truth snags on one of those assumptions.
Pocok5 t1_j2dplxg wrote
Reply to comment by PofanWasTaken in ELI5: What makes the rust on a rusty nail different from the rust on shaving razors to where one needs an immediate tetanus shot and the other happens daily by DrySyllabub2563
You can stick caltrops in dung so they are more dangerous than "3cm nail in the foot" would ordinarily be. For actual handheld weapons, keeping them in good, sharp condition is kind of a priority, since it's small comfort to know the dude you scratched had a bad time a week after he partitioned your ass like it's Poland. Of course peasant armies often went to war with whatever pokey tool they had, and you can absolutely get tetanus from getting stabbed by a hay fork or a straightened scythe. Against armored opponents, sharp weapons are of little use, so knight vs knight combat would have been maces and hammers mostly, and those don't do deep stab wounds anyway (except war picks and morning stars
The_Casual_Scribbler t1_j2dpjzx wrote
Reply to comment by PofanWasTaken in ELI5: What makes the rust on a rusty nail different from the rust on shaving razors to where one needs an immediate tetanus shot and the other happens daily by DrySyllabub2563
The way I understand it is that rust is a good environment for the bacteria so it is more likely to maintain active bacteria better. But I could be wrong lol.
[deleted] t1_j2dpjcq wrote
theperfectmuse t1_j2dpc7w wrote
Reply to comment by jswansong in Eli5 How exactly does Noise cancellation work? That too in such small airbuds by Professional-Ad3441
I can't wrap my head around the idea of "opposite sound".
ProveISaidIt t1_j2dpc7e wrote
Reply to comment by epelle9 in ELI5: Why plates get too hot to touch in the mircrowave but the food can still be cold? by jerrycotton
Microwave ovens work by causing the water molecules in the food to vibrate. That's how it heats food. You can look it up.
By your explanation a dry plate with no food on it would heat in a microwave.
From what I've always heard that would damage the microwave as there has to be water to absorb the microwave energy.
venReddit t1_j2dp7zg wrote
Reply to Eli5 How exactly does Noise cancellation work? That too in such small airbuds by Professional-Ad3441
Sound is swinging air. Its like a wave. You have tops and bottoms in the wave. Noise cancelation records the sound and gives back the opposite spike. Top spikes get cancelled with bottom spikes of same strength and other way round. This is why you can feel some sort of pressure in your ears, when you have noise cancellation in your ears without actual music, when the outside is loud.
4tehlulzez t1_j2dp6m3 wrote
Reply to comment by LandoChronus in ELI5: Why does putting one foot out from under the blankets bring so much relief of heat while laying in bed? by SirDuke6
Now put them basically everywhere besides the feet like the commenter said.
[deleted] t1_j2drapz wrote
Reply to ELI5: How did we realise the mind is in the brain? by theembryo
[deleted]