Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive
Kn0wnSoul t1_j63bm5m wrote
Reply to comment by arcanezeroes in Eli5: how does stomach acid not exit with feces when we have diarrhoea? Isn't it just a sphincter which should in theory not be infallible? by Thtanilaw1113
Yea bro, most of the stuff is poop.
ghigoli t1_j63b4ah wrote
Reply to ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
almost all wars usually have another nation or rich people supplying them that aren't at war with the other nation.
its annoying but its not 'going to war'. there are buyers, donators, and people that generally just support one side over the other.
its just a standard thing tbh. the US did it during WW1 before we entered the war. Germany mercenaries were used in the US revolutionary war. During the civil war they used French and British backers for weapons and stuff for the French side. China + Russia was bankrolling North Korea. Etc,etc,etc. Its just a normal thing for countries to support allies in times of war without being at war themselves.
arcanezeroes t1_j63b45q wrote
Reply to comment by Gnonthgol in Eli5: how does stomach acid not exit with feces when we have diarrhoea? Isn't it just a sphincter which should in theory not be infallible? by Thtanilaw1113
>Technically all your excrement was at one point stomach acid
Pretty sure there's other stuff in there too
FellowConspirator t1_j63an18 wrote
Reply to Eli5: how does stomach acid not exit with feces when we have diarrhoea? Isn't it just a sphincter which should in theory not be infallible? by Thtanilaw1113
Stomach acid is mixed with other stuff in the stomach, so it’s not just acid. Then, once it leaves the stomach, it’s mixed with bile, which contains bicarbonate that neutralizes the acid.
More importantly, diarrhea happens when water filters into your intestines, diluting everything and flushing stuff out.
steruY t1_j639hjz wrote
Reply to comment by Belzeturtle in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
Thanks, hope in humanity restored
aminy23 t1_j639fji wrote
Reply to comment by monkChuck105 in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
Private mercenaries are different than official government.
[deleted] t1_j638kfa wrote
Reply to ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
[removed]
Belzeturtle t1_j637cms wrote
Reply to comment by steruY in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
You need three people acting unison to fire a strategic nuke, Putin being only one of them. These people have families, properties and lives they don't want to lose.
nevbirks t1_j6374fi wrote
Reply to ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
It is, but Russia declaring war against the world before it had time to fully mobilize its fighting age men would mean they get wiped out quicker.
1958showtime t1_j636vxl wrote
Reply to comment by mmmmmmBacon12345 in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
Yup, WW2 was the perfect example. Hitler didn't need to declare war on the US, the US were only at war with Japan. Hitler did the US a favour by declaring war. Once he did, the US no longer had to jump through hoops to participate or keep sending aid.
monkChuck105 t1_j636qq7 wrote
Reply to comment by aminy23 in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
There have been American mercs in Ukraine already.
monkChuck105 t1_j6364fm wrote
Reply to comment by Art_Z_Fartzche in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
Trouble is that these territories were annexed by Russia, and it is defending them. The fact that Ukraine has called for retaking Crimea and the calls for removing Putin do not help. From the Russian pov this is a defensive war to stop the advance of NATO to it's border, where it could place nuclear missiles within 5 min of Moscow. That's the end of Russian sovereignty. It's just another continuation of the Cold War, where the US fought at or near the borders of the Soviets or China and pretended it was defending against the spread of communism, which was not spread by force but by popular revolt. This is obvious to any who have studied modern history, but inconceivable to those who only know the current thing.
steruY t1_j635p7p wrote
Reply to comment by WasabiSunshine in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
"Зачем нам мир без России?" - "Why do we need the world without Russia?" - a phrase commonly told by putin. A dictator who loses a self created war, loses power, and is desperate, is something to be feared. Russia doesn't want nuclear war, but nobody can say so about its leader.
Maybe I'm just panicking, but there no need to keep the guard down.
monkChuck105 t1_j6352jr wrote
Reply to comment by Stonius123 in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
We are giving Ukraine weapons to aid their war against Russia, not just selling them. HIMARS are directed by US intelligence and fire control. We are literally bringing Ukrainians to the US to train on Abrams tanks, teaching Ukrainians to fight as NATO forces.
Immediate-Win-4928 t1_j633zau wrote
Reply to Eli5: how does stomach acid not exit with feces when we have diarrhoea? Isn't it just a sphincter which should in theory not be infallible? by Thtanilaw1113
Your acid is in the stomach only, there are sphincters on both ends of the stomach. When the food moves by peristalsis into the small intestine the acid is neutralised with your own bodies basic juices
Diarrhea is uncontrollable contractions of the large intestine, there is never acid there unless something is seriously wrong further up
WasabiSunshine t1_j633j4c wrote
Reply to comment by steruY in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
Eh They (decision makers of Russia) aren't going to fight a nuclear war with the west as they know MAD holds true as ever, and they aren't gonna fight a conventional war because why would they ever think that was a good idea
weirdlybeardy t1_j632sjr wrote
Reply to ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
You are a bang that wants more territory. You are armed to the teeth with many gang members, lots of weapons.
You attack a neighboring gang that you used to basically control, because they seem to want to align with another gang a bit further away that hasn’t moved in on your territory, but you’re worried that they might, at some point.
The faraway gang doesn’t actually get involved in the fight, but they throw some arms at the gang you’re fighting, so that they can at least defend themselves.
Is the faraway gang in the fight? Yes or no?
No. As stated in the scenario above, the faraway gang hasn’t actually gotten involved in the fight themselves.
[deleted] t1_j632sc4 wrote
monkChuck105 t1_j632jkp wrote
Reply to comment by Target880 in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
The Taliban demanded proof that bin Laden did 9/11. The Taliban had no quarrel with the US prior to the invasion, even if they had close ties to Al Qaeda which wanted the US out of the mid east entirely.
monkChuck105 t1_j6325o1 wrote
Reply to comment by Lithuim in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
You're badly misinformed. It was the US that armed the Mujahideen to fight the Soviets, and this became the Taliban. Guess who also helped fight the Soviets? Osama bin Laden. This is how they came into being, American training and military aid. We did the same thing in Syria, and we have done the same in Ukraine. It's the American MO, arm the enemies of our enemies, even if they're Hitler or Stalin or Sadam or bin Laden.
steruY t1_j632347 wrote
Reply to comment by Dependent-Law7316 in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
>no one wants to be the one to officially start world war 3
Let's hope so, after Russia started the invasion there is plenty of reasons to worry.
WordsNumbersAndStats t1_j631opr wrote
Reply to Eli5: how does stomach acid not exit with feces when we have diarrhoea? Isn't it just a sphincter which should in theory not be infallible? by Thtanilaw1113
Diarrheal fluids typically originate in the bowel (small or large intestine), not the stomach. In addition to the length of the small and large bowels, all of which are absorptive tissue, and the fact that gastric acid is neutralized in the duodenum, there are four sphincters between the stomach and the toilet bowl - the pyloric sphincter, the ileocecal sphincter and the internal and external anal sphincters.
Diarrheal fluids are typically alkaline, not acidic because of all the intestinal bicarbonate secretion.
[deleted] t1_j631do3 wrote
BackRowRumour t1_j63017q wrote
Reply to comment by skizzybwoi in eli5 why just one single day sleeping at the wrong time is enough for destroying your sleep routine, and makes it so hard to restore it? by _hetris
Shut up! You're not my real dad!
ghigoli t1_j63bmfx wrote
Reply to comment by faceintheblue in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
if NATO attacked Russia. we'll probably be close to Moscow within a week and Putin would be launching ever threat he can think of from his underground bunker while the humming of drones surround the only way in and out.
US would probably be halfway to Siberia invading from Alaska. then China is gonna invade because they can.