Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive
Any-Growth8158 t1_j65u0dz wrote
Reply to comment by druppolo in ELI5: Is aluminum common enough that it’s not a concern, or are we just really good at recycling it? by RestrictedCervical
Mostly correct, although the part about pure aluminum not corroding is absolutely incorrect. Pure aluminum corrodes very quickly, but it's oxide doesn't flake and fall off like rust on iron. The outside of pure aluminum quickly corrodes in our atmosphere creating a very thin skin of an aluminum oxide. This thin layer provides a barrier that prevents oxygen from getting further into the aluminum and corroding the interior.
crenshawcrane OP t1_j65t5xp wrote
Thank you all for the answers!
Any-Growth8158 t1_j65swbf wrote
Reply to comment by ColdDesert77 in ELI5: Is aluminum common enough that it’s not a concern, or are we just really good at recycling it? by RestrictedCervical
Processing ore to produce aluminum is expensive.
Recycling (remelting) aluminum is easy and rather inexpensive.
The original poster is missing an "it" before the "is", but that shouldn't render the sentence incomprehensive.
[deleted] t1_j65sucy wrote
Reply to ELI5: why do we eat so much after getting high by ani77
[removed]
ColdDesert77 t1_j65s409 wrote
Reply to comment by HockeyCookie in ELI5: Is aluminum common enough that it’s not a concern, or are we just really good at recycling it? by RestrictedCervical
> While it's incredibly expensive to refine from the earth is 100% recyclable.
Huh?
[deleted] t1_j65rzrf wrote
Reply to ELI5: why do we eat so much after getting high by ani77
[removed]
GalFisk t1_j65rvog wrote
Reply to comment by Target880 in ELI5: Is aluminum common enough that it’s not a concern, or are we just really good at recycling it? by RestrictedCervical
Yeah, it's as common as dirt, literally.
trier1974 t1_j65rqqw wrote
Reply to Eli5 why our brain sometimes out of nowhere brings embarrassing/bad moments or encounters you’ve had by barking_at_cars
Basically "unsolved things" which are subconsciously being remembered.
BoredCop t1_j65r2fq wrote
Reply to comment by GandalfSwagOff in ELI5: Is aluminum common enough that it’s not a concern, or are we just really good at recycling it? by RestrictedCervical
Not really vapor loss, but there typically is some loss to oxidation. Alu binds very tightly to oxygen, which is also the reason why it takes so much energy to refine from ore in the first place. Aluminium exposed to air instantly forms a thin oxide layer, which is a bit more difficult to recycle than "just melt it". Pretty sure even this oxide dross is worth recycling though, it's basically very high grade ore.
JamonDeJabugo t1_j65pr5u wrote
Reply to comment by MrBulletPoints in eli5 : Why do some companies make huge payouts when someone is fired? by Arsinoexx
I'm married to one of these people...I think of it like professional sport coaches or managers....they get fired a lot! Sometimes it's not even anything they did, just someone else bought the company and wants their own person in charge. My spouse's highest annual income, 7 figures USD...was the year they were made redundant.
slavmememachine t1_j65pngt wrote
Reply to comment by Raving_Lunatic69 in ELI5: How do we define the boundary between earth’s atmosphere and space? by crenshawcrane
I believe they say it’s 100 km because some guy named karman figured out that you would need to be moving at orbital speeds to generate enough lift and it was around 100 km
druppolo t1_j65or0b wrote
Reply to ELI5: Is aluminum common enough that it’s not a concern, or are we just really good at recycling it? by RestrictedCervical
Let’s put it like this:
It is abundant… but…!
But it’s one of the metal the loves the most to oxidize and react with all sort of things in nature. Once you make it pure, it stays pure and does not corrode past its surface, In nature however, it is four mixed with all sort of things to which it loves to stick.
So the process of getting new aluminum requires to melt and process a lot of rock, discarding the most of it and keep some aluminum oxide. This requires to melt a lot of stuff. Then you have to convince that oxide to let go the oxygen it loves to stick to, so you can get pure aluminum. This requires a lot of electricity.
Basically finding aluminum is not an issue, but the amount of energy needed to purify it (read it as coal, gas, oil to burn to get that energy) is very big.
GandalfSwagOff t1_j65ojgk wrote
Reply to comment by snash222 in ELI5: Is aluminum common enough that it’s not a concern, or are we just really good at recycling it? by RestrictedCervical
I would have figured there would be vapor loss during the heating.
LochFarquar t1_j65o8bw wrote
Reply to comment by DarkAlman in eli5 : Why do some companies make huge payouts when someone is fired? by Arsinoexx
This is good. I would just add that in many cases companies will make a severance payment in exchange for a waiver of claims. Better to pay someone $5k or $10k to leave on good terms than have them leave on bad term and find a lawyer to bring a wrongful termination claim. That amount can be plowed through very quickly in legal fees.
snash222 t1_j65o2ct wrote
Reply to comment by GandalfSwagOff in ELI5: Is aluminum common enough that it’s not a concern, or are we just really good at recycling it? by RestrictedCervical
Aluminum is an element. The aluminum stays aluminum forever. You may have some “loss” by having it drip out of a melting vessel or something like that, but 100% of the aluminum still exists. Just sweep it up when it cools and put it in the next batch.
[deleted] t1_j65o0t8 wrote
GandalfSwagOff t1_j65kctb wrote
Reply to comment by HockeyCookie in ELI5: Is aluminum common enough that it’s not a concern, or are we just really good at recycling it? by RestrictedCervical
How is that possible? There has to be some sort of loss. 100% is 100%.
Amy_Schumer_Fan t1_j65jxun wrote
Reply to comment by CaptainAddi in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
Duh, just go to the front yard. Democracy wins again!!!
[deleted] t1_j65j0rf wrote
Target880 t1_j65ic8d wrote
Reply to ELI5: Is aluminum common enough that it’s not a concern, or are we just really good at recycling it? by RestrictedCervical
If you look at the abundance of elements in earth's crust aluminum is #3. It we use the CRC number from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abundance_of_elements_in_Earth%27s_crust we have
- Oxygen 46%
- Silicon 28%
- Aluminium 8.2%
- Iron 5.6%
So there is an enormous amount of aluminum. Most of it we use are in the for mof bauxite that is aluminum o
Aluminum is also recycled to a high degree. The primary reason is not the availability of bauxite ore. The primary reason is that the energy required to of recycling is 5% of the energy required to make it from ore. Aluminum requires a huge amount of electric energy to refine.
36% of the aluminum produced in the US comes from scrap. Globally the recycling rate is around 76% and it is estimated that 75% of all aluminum ever produced is still in usage.
Dovaldo83 t1_j65hzqd wrote
Reply to comment by Lithuim in ELI5: Is aluminum common enough that it’s not a concern, or are we just really good at recycling it? by RestrictedCervical
To add to this, despite being in 8% of the Earth's crust, aluminum used to be very rare in it's natural state. Producing aluminum from ore used to be so difficult that it was more expensive than silver.
When the Washington Monument was finished in 1884, they placed atop it an aluminum primid lighting rod. It was the largest single piece of aluminum cast at the time. 2 years later the Hall-Héroult process was discovered, which allowed aluminum to be made quite cheaply.
Mammoth-Mud-9609 t1_j65hprv wrote
Reply to ELI5: Is aluminum common enough that it’s not a concern, or are we just really good at recycling it? by RestrictedCervical
Basically the method for extracting aluminium from raw ore is the same way as recycling it except that recycling contains a much purer form of aluminium and produces less waste so it is a lot cheaper to process recycled aluminium than to extract aluminium from aluminium oxide or bauxite.
[deleted] t1_j65gxvm wrote
HockeyCookie t1_j65gx18 wrote
Reply to ELI5: Is aluminum common enough that it’s not a concern, or are we just really good at recycling it? by RestrictedCervical
While it's incredibly expensive to refine from the earth is 100% recyclable. You don't lose anything when you melt recycled aluminum.
rbankole t1_j65ux9e wrote
Reply to comment by WordsNumbersAndStats in Eli5: how does stomach acid not exit with feces when we have diarrhoea? Isn't it just a sphincter which should in theory not be infallible? by Thtanilaw1113
This guy pinches