Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive
CharsOwnRX-78-2 t1_j685sog wrote
Reply to comment by Intergalacticdespot in ELI5: why can't we use electricity to kill microorganisms in small amount of water ? by FreshT3ch
I mean we could do all that.
Or we could just let plants do it for us
Plastic_Wave t1_j685ru1 wrote
Reply to Eli5: if cardio makes the heart stronger by increasing heart rate and blood pressure, why do energy drinks damage it? by CrammedMeat
For most questions in biology when you ask "why is X ok but not Y" the answer is usually always scale. Because Y is too much.
When you exercise your body will tell you when you are pushing it too far, when your heart rate has been too high for too long. When you have to stop and take a breather for a minute, your heart can also take a rest and the heart rate can come down.
Energy drinks however stimulates the heart to go full throttle for hours, with no breaks or rests. Often with no purpose or gain. It's too much
[deleted] t1_j685jz1 wrote
[removed]
missthingxxx t1_j685bii wrote
Reply to comment by mfb- in ELI5: How is caesium-137 used in mining operations? by kitsunesan1029
Do you reckon they're gonna find it?
hyzermofo t1_j685a4s wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ELI5: why can't we use electricity to kill microorganisms in small amount of water ? by FreshT3ch
So human life specifically?
hyzermofo t1_j68577s wrote
Reply to comment by murmurat1on in ELI5: why can't we use electricity to kill microorganisms in small amount of water ? by FreshT3ch
I have zero mates.
[deleted] t1_j6854v7 wrote
Reply to comment by hyzermofo in ELI5: why can't we use electricity to kill microorganisms in small amount of water ? by FreshT3ch
[deleted]
hyzermofo t1_j6850h4 wrote
Reply to comment by FlyingMacheteSponser in ELI5: why can't we use electricity to kill microorganisms in small amount of water ? by FreshT3ch
TIL that I had zero idea how defribulator is spelled. I give it 30 minutes, then it's gone again.
Edit: turns out I knew very well it's spelled defibrillator. Bamboozled. Hoodwinked. And also the other one.
justlookingforajob1 t1_j684za0 wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why are we the only species that has to pay to live. I mean we also have to pay to keep other animals alive. by Pretty-Membership430
Nearly everything a wild animal has or gets is because they went and got it themselves or with the help of a few others. Most are naked and homeless. They are vulnerable to the elements, to predators, and to disease. Most have a very short lifespan. On Maslow's hierarchy of needs, they live at the bottom - survive and reproduce.
Humans have found ways to improve our lot in life and meet our needs for additional development. Some might say because we've evolved to do more with our minds and bodies and time, some might say it's because we are God's children and not animals and have a different destiny for life. Either way, we thrive because we divide up labor and help one another. This division of labor means that I can focus on one thing - producing food, or building shelter, or producing clothing or organizing excel sheets, etc. While others produce one thing, and then in this amazingly complex way we trade what we all do with one another, and we use money to make that happen.
So I organize excel sheets all day because I get money to do that and I trade that money with others who produce food and clothing and gasoline and electricity - so I don't have to.
In aggregate, we work less than animals do and we get more in return for our labor.
hyzermofo t1_j684v42 wrote
Reply to comment by dvorahtheexplorer in ELI5: why can't we use electricity to kill microorganisms in small amount of water ? by FreshT3ch
Watt?
hyzermofo t1_j684t6r wrote
Reply to comment by shinn91 in ELI5: why can't we use electricity to kill microorganisms in small amount of water ? by FreshT3ch
So fun! Was he German? Sounds like he was German.
WordsNumbersAndStats t1_j684svb wrote
Reply to comment by ranma_one_half in Eli5: how does stomach acid not exit with feces when we have diarrhoea? Isn't it just a sphincter which should in theory not be infallible? by Thtanilaw1113
Repeated reflux of gastric juice can also cause reflux laryngitis - a voice disorder caused by inflammation of the larynx (voice box) by the acid. The patient will have hoarseness but may be unaware of the reflux (no burning sensation as with GERD or run of the mill heartburn).
NorfX t1_j684s97 wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why are we the only species that has to pay to live. I mean we also have to pay to keep other animals alive. by Pretty-Membership430
Because of a long history in which power over others enabled a more comfortable life, which ended up in a lot of people thinking that still applies today but got translated to having a big number associated with them.
hyzermofo t1_j684ozd wrote
Reply to comment by mmmmmmBacon12345 in ELI5: why can't we use electricity to kill microorganisms in small amount of water ? by FreshT3ch
What if the lightning you use is greased? Surely then at least the chills would multiply?
s_m_m t1_j684l68 wrote
Reply to ELI5: why can't we use electricity to kill microorganisms in small amount of water ? by FreshT3ch
Yes, you can. I actually keep an electrolytic water purifier (mixed oxidant) in my emergency kit.
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_water_purifier
> A simple brine {salt + water} solution in an electrolytic reaction produces a powerful mixed oxidant disinfectant (mostly chlorine in the form of hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and some peroxide, ozone, chlorine dioxide).
hyzermofo t1_j684khs wrote
Reply to comment by frakc in ELI5: why can't we use electricity to kill microorganisms in small amount of water ? by FreshT3ch
Like, life? Primordial soup, that sort of thing?
Sufficient-Green-763 t1_j684dv3 wrote
Reply to comment by MahaveerKurukshetri in ELI5: why can't we use electricity to kill microorganisms in small amount of water ? by FreshT3ch
No it's funnier his way 🤣
chris_p_bacon1 t1_j684ckd wrote
Reply to comment by snash222 in ELI5: Is aluminum common enough that it’s not a concern, or are we just really good at recycling it? by RestrictedCervical
Surely you'd have some sort of back reaction to AlO2. I work in primary aluminium production a few certainly have issues with back reaction.
[deleted] t1_j6846mu wrote
[removed]
mfb- t1_j6845ze wrote
Reply to comment by missthingxxx in ELI5: How is caesium-137 used in mining operations? by kitsunesan1029
I haven't seen an actual activity value for it but with typical values the power will be just of the order of a milliwatt or less. That's far less than the sunlight that hits an equal area so it won't be notably hotter.
Looking for its gamma emission directly is more promising.
[deleted] t1_j683ey9 wrote
Reply to comment by mmmmmmBacon12345 in ELI5: why can't we use electricity to kill microorganisms in small amount of water ? by FreshT3ch
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j683c5s wrote
Reply to comment by Rakeallday in ELI5: why can't we use electricity to kill microorganisms in small amount of water ? by FreshT3ch
[deleted]
Donohoed t1_j6839u4 wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why are we the only species that has to pay to live. I mean we also have to pay to keep other animals alive. by Pretty-Membership430
All animals need to work to eat if they aren't pets or farm animals. Whether it's hunting, foraging, or leading/protecting a pack, they all contribute to their own survival and that of their community.
Money is a physical representation of goods or services provided to others that are used in trade. It's a human society's version of the same thing that happens in the wild but allows it to happen on a much larger scale.
en1mal t1_j6865gd wrote
Reply to comment by hyzermofo in ELI5: why can't we use electricity to kill microorganisms in small amount of water ? by FreshT3ch
I think he means electrolysis. Putting a current in a solution (e.g between two metal prongs) makes the negative and positive charged particles flock to their according charge. Or new particles form. Its how the metal industry applies small films of materials to objects.