Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive
Doctor_Expendable t1_j6feyru wrote
Reply to comment by PD_31 in Eli5....can you dig a well anywhere and hit water...and how did the early ranchers in the West know where to dig for water. Especially in the really dry areas? by pinkshrinkrn
There is a lot that goes into it. There's an entire branch of science called hydrogeology that is quite complex. There is a lot of high level math involved in being able to accurately predict groundwater flow.
n1nj4zftw t1_j6fe7b2 wrote
deadmanbehindthemask t1_j6fe62f wrote
Reply to Eli5....can you dig a well anywhere and hit water...and how did the early ranchers in the West know where to dig for water. Especially in the really dry areas? by pinkshrinkrn
Our well is 900' deep. At least in this area, the driller said it wouldn't really matter where on the property he drilled (and it is a pretty big property). I get the impression that around here the geology that would dictate where/how deep the water is is on a much larger scale than property boundaries.
RandomRDP t1_j6fe2s5 wrote
Reply to comment by ZevVeli in ELI5: How do they come up with names for countries in foreign languages? by bentobam
In this case it was literally Chinese Whispers.
wildsky t1_j6fdwa3 wrote
Reply to comment by Way2Foxy in Eli5....can you dig a well anywhere and hit water...and how did the early ranchers in the West know where to dig for water. Especially in the really dry areas? by pinkshrinkrn
Water witching is utter bunk.
crono141 t1_j6fdor8 wrote
Reply to comment by mostlygray in Eli5....can you dig a well anywhere and hit water...and how did the early ranchers in the West know where to dig for water. Especially in the really dry areas? by pinkshrinkrn
Should have tried dowsing. Would have found it lots faster.
/s in case it isn't obvious.
crono141 t1_j6fdgv8 wrote
Reply to comment by Saint_D420 in Eli5....can you dig a well anywhere and hit water...and how did the early ranchers in the West know where to dig for water. Especially in the really dry areas? by pinkshrinkrn
Is this the rare double woosh?
[deleted] t1_j6fcvm3 wrote
Reply to ELI5 - why body massage are always better when done by someone else? by Adventurous-Tour-981
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6fcepa wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6fbyxf wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Eli5: Why can paracetamol reduce empathy? by Big_carrot_69
[removed]
milkytrizzle93 t1_j6fbute wrote
Reply to comment by legendofthegreendude in Eli5....can you dig a well anywhere and hit water...and how did the early ranchers in the West know where to dig for water. Especially in the really dry areas? by pinkshrinkrn
You'd definitely be well supplied with water
InfintySquared t1_j6fb9r1 wrote
Reply to comment by drafterman in ELI5: What is the difference between fatalism and nihilism? by bluejester12
They are not necessarily mutual, not necessarily mutually exclusive.
evil_burrito t1_j6fb0o3 wrote
Reply to Eli5....can you dig a well anywhere and hit water...and how did the early ranchers in the West know where to dig for water. Especially in the really dry areas? by pinkshrinkrn
They didn't (and don't) just dig randomly. You're more likely to find water at a lower spot on the terrain than a higher spot. The type and amount of growth is a tipoff, too. Plants like blackberries love water and are a good indicator of an available source, for example.
KitsuneRisu t1_j6fa2o7 wrote
Unfortunately your question is based on a faulty understanding.
As far as we know, scientifically, the 4th spatial dimension has NOT been proven to exist. The thought experiment that you describe is based on a supposition / assumption of what it would be like IF a 4th spatial dimension DOES exist, but is not itself proof of the dimension existing.
In fact, that very thought experiment answers your question - a 2 dimensional being cannot percieve a 3 dimensional shape more than 'slices of it' as it passes through their lives. A 3D being will similarly not be able to percieve a 4D object except for 'slices of it' as it passes through time in our plane of existance. We cannot see something that we cannot see.
However, why has the 4th Dimension not yet been proven? Well, if it does exist, tl;dr then we would be able to see these 'slices' occuring. Scientists have noted that in tests and particle tests, no matter from our world 'leaks' into any other dimension.
For a much longer but much more detailed explanation, you can read up here:
[deleted] t1_j6f9xxk wrote
Reply to comment by workingMan9to5 in Eli5: Why can paracetamol reduce empathy? by Big_carrot_69
[deleted]
dutchbob11 t1_j6f9t84 wrote
look at the shadow your hand makes on the wall:
that's a 2-dimensional representation of your hand
as seen by a 3-D person
now look at your hand directly:
that's the 3-dimensional shadow of your hand
as a 4-D person would see it
TheUncannyFoxhound t1_j6f9fgu wrote
Well, classically the fourth dimension is time (height, depth, width, and time would be how you plot where something is in space and time). Which you can't see time, so there's that.
But on the general nature of perception, you can only see within a narrow bandwidth of light, and there are colors outside your perception (like ultraviolet and infrared as a very immediately outside the band examples). You can't see radio waves, radiation, etc. The same is true for each other sense you have. Thus, it's "possible" an entire world that we can't perceive exists.
tokkyuuressha t1_j6f941f wrote
Reply to comment by series_hybrid in ELI5: How do they come up with names for countries in foreign languages? by bentobam
We still call it Pekin in Polish
blackdynomitesnewbag t1_j6f91ok wrote
Reply to comment by PackRevolutionary769 in ELI5: How does surgery on tendons work? by RaphaelRhyss
A 1.5" gap, god damn. Recovery is ok. I more or less have full range of motion, but still working on strength. I don't usually have pain, but I will by the end of the week if I walk to work every day. I bought an e-scooter for when I'm not feeling it. My ankle still kind of swells up randomly. How's yours?
Ratnix t1_j6f91og wrote
Reply to comment by Coconspiritors in ELI5/Why can’t we change the geography of a large area of land to bring desired weather by Coconspiritors
And just what do you think is going to happen to weather patterns when you start removing and building new mountains?
All you're going to do is move the location of the weather somewhere else. And that will effect the weather all across the world.
You might be able to make a small local change, but you could screw up the weather for a much larger area.
That's all assuming it was even something that humans could do in the first place.
phunkydroid t1_j6f8v5e wrote
Reply to comment by WinBarr86 in ELI5- what is the difference between a liquid and a fluid? by stinkybuttttt
>Amorphous means it changes
No, it doesn't. It means it has non crystalline structure.
shinysnake727 t1_j6f8s87 wrote
A fourth dimension doesn’t exist in the way you’re imagining it.
Forward and back is 1 dimensional like a line, adding left and right make it 2 dimensional, and adding up and down makes it 3 dimensional. There isn’t another spatial dimension like another direction you can go. Any direction you can go is a combination of forward, back, left, right, up, and down
Many consider time to be the fourth dimension and you obviously can’t “see” time like you can see and wrap your head around the 3 spatial dimensions.
Jojeco t1_j6f8q6y wrote
Reply to comment by Diogeneselcinico42 in ELI5 - why body massage are always better when done by someone else? by Adventurous-Tour-981
I assume this is related to the rain you can't tickle yourself. Thanks for an actual word to refer to about it.
frnb t1_j6ffuvv wrote
Reply to comment by cantrell_blues in Eli5: Can someone explain Vogue dancing? by TheRunningMD
Language!
Great response though.