Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive

MrM_37 OP t1_j6i1w99 wrote

I feel like it might be the taste too, I don't think most people would as excited to eat mashed/boiled potatoes as they would be for french fries because it doesn't taste as good and perhaps the amount of salt added to the french fries make people crave for more

−14

OperationMobocracy t1_j6i1rp7 wrote

This logic makes sense but it doesn't.

Why not just make all the ports USB 3.1? Even if they are all used for USB 3.1 high bandwidth devices, the odds that all these devices will use maximum throughput at a rate to saturate their PCIe lane access is near zero outside of /r/homelab situations. And most will be low bandwidth (HIDs, etc) anyway.

If they were all 3.1, you'd at least have the convenience of always getting a 3.1 port and functionality (barring intensive oversubscription of the PCIe lane).

To me this argument reminds me of my electrical panel. I have 200 amp service, which means I should only have about thirteen 15 amp breakers. Less if I'm feeding the 30 amp AC compressor and have to subtract 2 to make up for it. It's not like I'm going to install 5 amp breakers to keep total load potential below the main feed rating of 200 amps and then I can only use that one 15a outlet for appliances in my kitchen.

IMHO, still including USB 2.0 ports is a dumb legacy design that has few real world benefits and creates user inconvenience. I'm sure there are niche applications (industrial PCs with bad USB devices that puke on 3.1 ports), but that's like making everyone use a cane because some people have mobility problems.

1

explainlikeimfive-ModTeam t1_j6i0shb wrote

Please read this entire message


Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):

  • Rule #2 - Questions must seek objective explanations

  • ELI5 requires that your question be obvious from your post topic (Rule 2)


If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.

1

captaindeadpl t1_j6i0klk wrote

If I understand the summary of this study correctly, eating boiled potatoes doesn't satiate more than eating fries, at least if you use an equal mass of potatoes. The amount of oil increases the amount of calories in the fries a lot though and I can imagine that the shape of the fries makes them look like they're more than they are. Potatoes are big and stack densely, but french fries stack rather loosely, so if you fill bowls of the same size, the bowl with fries will be a lot lighter than that with boiled potatoes.

29

AnDraoi t1_j6i0arg wrote

It’s because of water content, most likely. A common comparison I used to see was “are you going to get full faster on grapes or raisins?” They’re the same thing basically but one is dried. Because of that it takes up less volume and mass and can fit more compactly in the stomach per calorie

33

ScienceIsSexy420 t1_j6hzj6b wrote

Consuming fruits is VERY different from eating candy. The sugar is complexed with the fiber, which slows down absorption rates and "flattens the curve" of the blood sugar spike. Fruits also contain essential vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients. Fruit juices? Might as well be soda. An apple or a banana? Do it up!

3

rubseb t1_j6hze57 wrote

Not OP but: why? This question absolutely has perfectly objective answers to do with the physics of heat transfer. OP isn't asking "why do I feel colder than my parents in the same situation" (which would be subjective), they're asking "why do the same people feel colder in one environment than another, given the same temperature"?

1