Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive

Brightredroof t1_j6n69vn wrote

Minecraft has reasonably limited game play objectives. There's a dragon you can go kill, and a couple of other bosses, but they're not really the point.

The point really is to explore and create.

It's popular because it's mechanics are simple to understand and work with for new players and even young children, but the potential for things to do is really limited solely by your imagination.

21

Hipposy t1_j6n64t6 wrote

During World War II, the Nazis were in control of much information and spread false information about what was happening to Jews and other minority groups. They also punished people who tried to spread the truth. The Jews in Elie Wiesel's town lived far from the war and the first concentration camps and didn't know what was happening. When the Nazis came to their town, it was too late for them to escape or find out the truth. This was partly because they didn't have access to information and partly because they couldn't believe the terrible things that were happening.

13

PaxNova t1_j6n5kp1 wrote

Publishers sell books to libraries. A book can be checked out about 20 times before normal wear and tear makes it unsuitable for circulation, and a new book is purchased. Also, they'd buy multiple copies of popular books so multiple people can read them at once. Once those books have been read, they don't often get checked out again. Imagine Oprah recommends a book for everyone to read. High checkouts one month, low checkouts the next month.

For eBooks, the same sales paradigm as physical books has been replicated. Libraries purchase bundles of X number of checkouts, with a certain number of checkouts at a time.

You're right in that you absolutely could do as you say, technically speaking. But that would infringe on copyright. The rights holders have the right to sell them as they wish.

What makes eBooks different is that each time you lend an eBook, you are not actually "lending" anything. You make a new copy on your device. Even if you are prevented from accessing the original copy, it's just promising not to use it while someone else makes an illegal copy. This would invalidate copyright. That's why eBooks are treated more like software than books. Physically, they are.

3

Metallic-Blue t1_j6n5353 wrote

Money, and contracts requiring us to repurchase the title after a contracted number of checkouts.

Library Nerd for 20 years here.

Physical books we typically keep between 25 to 50 checkouts. After that, we figure the taxpayers got their value out of it, and if it becomes lost or damaged, we typically write it off.

Digital content come with Digital Rights Management and contracts. That same Stephen King physical book might check out 40 times before we decide to replace it. Some of our digital content becomes inactive after 17 checkouts, and we have to "buy" a new copy to keep up with demand. It's irritating. And each vendor has their own metrics, complicating the problem.

We have our own calculations and metrics to decided how many to buy on release (X number of requests means we need Y number of copies to fulfill in Z amount of time), but digital copies are a blessing and a curse and a money suck.

Edit: That being said, nothing is stopping you from checking out books on CD, and ripping them while you browse Reddit.

What you do with the material purchased with taxpayer dollars, in your own house, is your own business as long as you do not deny access to the material to other members of th community.

1

pridefulPie62550 t1_j6n50kf wrote

Vaping without nicotine may not seem as harmful, but it's still bad news for your health. That's because e-cigs heat up a liquid containing chemicals, flavorings and other additives to create a vapor you inhale into your lungs. The heating process can release toxic chemicals like formaldehyde and acrolein, and the long-term effects of inhaling these unknown. Plus, the flavorings used can be harmful and have been linked to serious health issues.

1

No-Ad8720 t1_j6n4ifd wrote

Publishers are the money grubbers .They charge exorbitant rates for public libraries to buy popular fiction. Or they insist the libraries take lousy Ebooks off their hands for a reduced cost. Our local library has a glut of lousy Ebooks that crowd the online Ebook sites. Going digital has improved the access one has to reading material 24/7 without leaving home. The good Ebooks are always in use. At Christmas I wanted to take out a bunch of Christmas festive books as I had extra time off this year. All of the Christmas stuff was borrowed. Now that it is February all of the holiday reading is available. Which is no help at all.

I've been trying to find an online library that lends Ebooks for a nominal fee , they don't exist. I really miss the old libraries.

−1

Phage0070 t1_j6n3glv wrote

Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):

ELI5 is not for information about a specific narrow issue (personal problems, private experiences, legal questions, medical inquiries, how-to, relationship advice, etc.)

ELI5 is not for information about current events.

If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.

1

bobjoylove t1_j6n3f5l wrote

It’s not conjecture, it’s what is happening. Look at the size of the buybacks. It’s tens of billions of dollars. For example Chevron’s latest $75Bn or Google at $70bn last year. That’s a huge sum, and Google’s top 3 biggest acquisitions are Motorola at $12.5bn, Nest at $3.2bn and Doubleclick at $3.1bn.

So it could remake 3 of its biggest acquisitions and still have about $50bn for a buyback. They would then have three huge acquisitions to integrate and manage, which is a lot of work for HR and a pivot for the company to new revenue sources and a risk of being investigated as a monopoly.

They have no better idea to use the vast sums of money other than a buyback.

1