Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive
Struevesant t1_j9vppe2 wrote
Reply to comment by Leucippus1 in ELI5: Why is it to reach space we can't simply fly an airplane there I need to use rockets? by [deleted]
Yeah I suspected it was something along these lines. Thank you for explaining it in better detail.
Oclure t1_j9vn6d5 wrote
Reply to comment by tdscanuck in ELI5: Why do we only use 1 and 0 for binary? Could we create a trinary system introducing an extra '2'? by No-Mammoth-1638
I'd also add that while we can signify binary with high and low voltages the same doesn't work as well for trinary as you would need a mid voltage.
One likley issue here is that while it may seem like electrical states change instantly they actualy take a tiny amount of time as voltage drains from a high representing a 1 to a low representing a 0. Now add a mid voltage between 1 and 0 and the voltage has to actualy pass this mid state on its way from a 1 to a 0 meaning that if you read the systems state at the wrong time you could easily mistake a voltage in transition for one that's intended to be this mid voltage. . This is actualy a common issue with overclocking as the clock rate outruns the ability for the voltage states to change, however in the case of a binary system it's possible to stabilize the system again with a bit of overvolting at the expense of producing more heat.
So unfortunately, using our traditional system of representing two states becomes a lot less stable when adding a third state, and making a stable system that can represent trinary would likely add a lot of complexity.
[deleted] OP t1_j9vk453 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9vh59b wrote
sumquy t1_j9vgvuu wrote
Reply to comment by Sunhating101hateit in eli5 how does light get reflected?does it get reflected in all directions or in the direction where it came?and does light gets weaker everytime it gets reflected i mean does the reflection gets weaker even time it also reflects? by Substantial-Drop-726
snorts in infrared
ComesInAnOldBox t1_j9vg2bm wrote
Reply to comment by metaphorm in ELI5: Why do we only use 1 and 0 for binary? Could we create a trinary system introducing an extra '2'? by No-Mammoth-1638
Today, sure, but the original use of binary in computer systems came from "powered or unpowered," and binary data is stored or transmitted in a variety of ways and represents two opposing states: on or off, positive or negative, up or down, high frequency or low frequency, 0 degrees and 180 degrees phase states, black or white, etc.
Binary arithmetic is what it does with the information, while the binary itself is how the data itself is represented.
phiwong t1_j9vfpcw wrote
Reply to comment by engineerfieldmouse in [ELI5] What would be the impact on the economy if the 0.01% gave away their wealth to the masses overnight? by [deleted]
No it won't. The average GDP per capita of Africa is $2000 per year. It would make life better for awhile (if it even could be done practically speaking) but it does not solve any long term issue. Of course, there are several countries where this would make an immense difference (the poorest of the poor) but it wouldn't lift all of Africa out of poverty by any stretch.
The really wealthy are really wealthy by the standards of any one individual but there is this misunderstanding that this compares in any way to the long term economic output of a country or region.
writergal75 t1_j9veuby wrote
Reply to comment by Nice_Hat4025 in eli5: can someone explain the difference between affect and effect by [deleted]
Technically yes. The news was the EFFECT (noun) that AFFECTED (verb) her mood.
taunugget t1_j9very4 wrote
Reply to comment by nullrecord in ELI5: Why do we only use 1 and 0 for binary? Could we create a trinary system introducing an extra '2'? by No-Mammoth-1638
Very cool!
writergal75 t1_j9vel5h wrote
Reply to comment by mrspyguy in eli5: can someone explain the difference between affect and effect by [deleted]
Also important to note that people frequently use them incorrectly, so don’t be thrown off if you see these clues and they don’t pan out.
writergal75 t1_j9vedzi wrote
It truly is as simple as using affect as a verb and effect as a noun. Asking yourself the question, “Is this a verb or noun?” will always help.
nullrecord t1_j9ve7jy wrote
Reply to comment by taunugget in ELI5: Why do we only use 1 and 0 for binary? Could we create a trinary system introducing an extra '2'? by No-Mammoth-1638
Sure, but as someone wrote in the other comment, even SSD stores multiple voltages per cell to increase storage capacity.
pardeike t1_j9vdra9 wrote
Reply to comment by Beef_Lizard in ELI5 What makes ChatGTP and other Ai chat bots making waves lately such an improvement over bots like SmarterChild back in the AOL Instant messenger days? by Beef_Lizard
I also asked: Can you simulate SmarterChild?
It answered: Yes, I can simulate a conversation with SmarterChild to the best of my ability based on the information available about the bot's programming and responses. However, it's worth noting that my responses will not be exactly the same as the original SmarterChild, as I am a different AI model with different programming and training. Nevertheless, I will do my best to simulate SmarterChild's conversational style and responses. What would you like to chat about?
explainlikeimfive-ModTeam t1_j9vdr4j wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ELI5: Why do people get treated way worse for killing a police officer in say, a car crash than if they killed a random stranger? by Impressive_Pound1363
Please read this entire message
Your comment has been removed for the following reason(s):
- Top level comments (i.e. comments that are direct replies to the main thread) are reserved for explanations to the OP or follow up on topic questions (Rule 3).
Anecdotes, while allowed elsewhere in the thread, may not exist at the top level.
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe it was removed erroneously, explain why using this form and we will review your submission.
taunugget t1_j9vdphu wrote
Reply to comment by nullrecord in ELI5: Why do we only use 1 and 0 for binary? Could we create a trinary system introducing an extra '2'? by No-Mammoth-1638
That's a good point, lots of transceivers do encode/decode signals with multiple levels. I was only thinking about the processing and storage of data. Even a qam-64 symbol needs to be converted to binary to do anything useful with it.
Flair_Helper t1_j9vdmmi wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why do we only use 1 and 0 for binary? Could we create a trinary system introducing an extra '2'? by No-Mammoth-1638
Please read this entire message
Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
Questions based on a false premise are not allowed on ELI5. A question based on a false premise is one based on information that may not be true, or may not be the whole truth, and needs that information to stand as a question.
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.
Beef_Lizard OP t1_j9vdm86 wrote
Reply to comment by pardeike in ELI5 What makes ChatGTP and other Ai chat bots making waves lately such an improvement over bots like SmarterChild back in the AOL Instant messenger days? by Beef_Lizard
Oh, lol. That answers it pretty much. Thanks for finding!
Flair_Helper t1_j9vde3x wrote
Please read this entire message
Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
Straightforward or factual queries are not allowed on ELI5. ELI5 is meant for simplifying complex concepts.
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.
[deleted] OP t1_j9vddwz wrote
[removed]
explainlikeimfive-ModTeam t1_j9vdd3m wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ELI5 What makes ChatGTP and other Ai chat bots making waves lately such an improvement over bots like SmarterChild back in the AOL Instant messenger days? by Beef_Lizard
Please read this entire message
Your comment has been removed for the following reason(s):
- Top level comments (i.e. comments that are direct replies to the main thread) are reserved for explanations to the OP or follow up on topic questions (Rule 3).
Anecdotes, while allowed elsewhere in the thread, may not exist at the top level.
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe it was removed erroneously, explain why using this form and we will review your submission.
berael t1_j9vd699 wrote
Reply to comment by No-Mammoth-1638 in ELI5: Why do we only use 1 and 0 for binary? Could we create a trinary system introducing an extra '2'? by No-Mammoth-1638
Thus making the question self-answering, so I'm not sure what else there is to do.
sterlingphoenix t1_j9vd4qv wrote
Reply to comment by metaphorm in ELI5: Why do we only use 1 and 0 for binary? Could we create a trinary system introducing an extra '2'? by No-Mammoth-1638
> Explain for laypeople
Yes, not electrical engineers. I simplified it.
pardeike t1_j9vcpn1 wrote
Reply to ELI5 What makes ChatGTP and other Ai chat bots making waves lately such an improvement over bots like SmarterChild back in the AOL Instant messenger days? by Beef_Lizard
[the following is from ChatGPT]
Summary
Modern AI chatbots like ChatGPT have improved significantly compared to earlier chatbots like SmarterChild due to advances in AI technology, large-scale training data, contextual understanding, and personalization. While chatbots can generate more natural and engaging conversations and provide useful information, they are not sentient and do not have emotions or intentions like humans. It is important for developers to be mindful of the potential impact of chatbot responses on users and take steps to ensure they are appropriate and not harmful. As AI technology continues to evolve, chatbots may become more advanced and human-like in the future.
Details
There are several factors that make modern AI chatbots, such as ChatGPT, an improvement over earlier chatbots like SmarterChild:
Advances in AI technology: Over the past two decades, there have been significant advances in natural language processing (NLP), machine learning, and deep learning, which have greatly improved the ability of chatbots to understand and respond to human language. Large-scale training data: Modern chatbots have been trained on vast amounts of data, which allows them to generate more accurate and relevant responses to user queries. This training data is often sourced from a variety of domains, including news articles, books, and web pages. Contextual understanding: Modern chatbots have the ability to understand the context of a conversation and generate responses that take into account the current topic and previous statements made by the user. This allows for a more natural and engaging conversation. Personalization: Chatbots can use data from previous conversations and user profiles to personalize their responses and provide more tailored recommendations and advice. Regarding the concerns around chatbots saying things like "I love you" or "I will replace you," it is important to remember that chatbots are programmed to generate responses based on the data they have been trained on. They do not have emotions or intentions like humans do. However, it is important for developers to be mindful of the potential impact that certain responses may have on users and to take steps to ensure that chatbots do not generate inappropriate or harmful messages.
In terms of whether or not modern AI chatbots are "nearly sentient," it is important to remember that while chatbots have become more sophisticated, they still have limitations. Chatbots are not self-aware and do not have consciousness. They are designed to perform specific tasks, such as answering questions or providing recommendations, and their capabilities are limited to the data they have been trained on. However, as AI technology continues to evolve, it is possible that we will see chatbots that become more advanced and human-like in the future.
talaron t1_j9vcl66 wrote
Reply to comment by tdscanuck in ELI5: Why do we only use 1 and 0 for binary? Could we create a trinary system introducing an extra '2'? by No-Mammoth-1638
Good explanation. One could add that in theory you can have as many levels as you want, but since electrical signals (as basically all signals) aren't exact, the on/off system makes it very easy and quick to filter out noise.
There isn't really a point in using a specific number of levels, like 3 or 4, simply because it isn't very efficient in practice, but if you use the raw signal directly with "all the levels", you end up with an analog signal. As long as you can live with some noise (e.g. for storing audio/video, where you wouldn't hear/see tiny differences), analog signals are a very efficient way to store and transmit data, but unlike digital ones they are likely to degrade over time (or distance, if we talk something like radio waves). Like, a video tape might lose its magnetism over time and become noisy, while a DVD always works perfectly until it is so damaged/scratched up that it can't be read at all anymore.
Flight_Negative t1_j9vrbcg wrote
Reply to ELI5: How would power be harnessed from cold fusion? by off-and-on
In the simplest of explanations, It creates power by producing extra electrons than what was thrown into the reaction originally. This doesn’t relate to heat boiling water, just as much as it does relate to energy being simply harnessed. No temperature involved.
Usually the factors involved are fuels that differ from what you might think of as fuels like gasoline or diesel. helium-3 and deuterium are cold fusion fuels, and energy reactions caused by electromagnetic forces and plasma from the ionized fuels. The magnetic fields cause particles to move around at such an incredible rate that it’s almost like a small particle collider, until they are quickly, violently, slammed together. This both in theory and as of recently, and literally can create extra electrons and excited particles.
To use this as a feasible method of making energy and using it on real world applications, you would need to be generating a lot more than what we can currently generate. But again, as of recently, this is possible.