Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive

annomandaris t1_jaarnci wrote

lol, you don't need the scientific method to count 13 lunar months, 28 days, 364 days in a year. and then after a few years you would realize that your days are off a little. After a few resets, it wouldn't be hard to realize that 1 day every 4 years keeps it on track.

This would have been known and kept track of so long ago, 50K? maybe 100K years ago. They didn't have writing tools but they had pretty sophisticated markings on sticks and stuff.

1

annomandaris t1_jaar5mo wrote

>However, it wasn't until the development of sophisticated astronomical observations that the length of a year could be determined accurately, leading to the Gregorian calendar with a year length of 365 days and a leap year of 366 days every four years

people in the Stone age would have had a lunar calendar which was 13 months of 28 days, totaling 364, and they would have realized it was offset every few years and adjusted it accordingly.

This would have been known a LONG, LONG time ago, long before writing, maybe as much as 100,000 years ago

I mean Stonehenge was made around 5000 years ago near the end of the stone age, and that was a masterpiece showing knowledge of leap days and such, and this was before any of the more advanced techniques of the bronze age like water clocks, hour glasses, and more precise sundials that showed up around 3500BC.

1

annomandaris t1_jaapimo wrote

Long before calendars, farmers knew the lunar schedule of 13 months of 28 days which is 364 days, and they knew it was off so every few years you had to adjust it. This would have been relatively common knowledge around 10-20K years ago.

Babylonians knew 360 was off when they made their calendar, but they didn't care. 360 was just too perfect for dividing stuff. So they just had a 4-5 day holiday after the harvest that didn't go on a calendar. People got a vacation after all that work, and the rest of the year you could divide days in your head. everyone wins.

15

zokahlo t1_jaaotml wrote

There are some lapses in thinking multiplying is all just 1x1.

Let’s think of it differently by thinking of apples.

When we add, we are counting how many apples in total we have. Let’s say we count all the apples in a tree, and we have 25. Then on another tree, there are another 25. We add those (25+25) and we get a total of 50 apples.

When we multiply, we’re considering units or groups of things. If I have a bag of apples, and each bag hold 5 apples, then I have 5 apples total. If I have multiple bags (let’s say 8 bags) then I’m going to multiply.

Since each bag holds 5 apples, and I have 8 total bags, I’ll multiply 5 apples (per bag) by 8 bags which leaves me with 40 apples.

In your question, we would have 11 groups of 11, which ends with 121; you would use 11+11 if you were adding 2 groups of 11.

0

bal00 t1_jaaoplf wrote

Engines have to take in air in order to burn fuel. In a naturally aspirated engine, that works a lot like your own breathing. Instead of an expanding chest, it's a piston moving down that creates suction.

In a forced induction engine there's some kind of external air pump (a turbocharger or supercharger) that forces pressurized air into the engine.

Both types have their advantages and disadvantages depending on the application. Naturally aspirated engines have better throttle response, but they make less power, for example. They're simpler to make but more difficult to modify, and often not quite as fuel-efficient as a forced induction engine optimized for economy.

30

PandaSchmanda t1_jaaoahw wrote

11 x 11 means 11 groups of 11, just like 10 x 10 means ten groups of ten. Ten groups of ten gives you 100 total objects, 11 groups of 11 gives you 121 of whatever you’re counting. You can try it with squares of grid paper if you don’t believe me.

2

Alternative-Sock-444 t1_jaao8fc wrote

So. It makes perfect sense really. Think about an ice cold water bottle on a hot day. Picture it. Is the exterior of the bottle wet, or dry? Wet. Because when hot, damp air touches a cold, dry object, it condenses into water droplets on the object. Now imagine the bottle is your egg, and the hot summer day is the inside of the egg cooker. The steam from the boiling water in the bottom of the cooker condenses and forms water droplets on the egg. Once the droplets get big enough, gravity takes hold, pulling them down. Down, back into the bottom of the cooker, to be boiled and start the cycle again

When you have a lot of eggs filling the chamber, you have a lot of surface area for water to condense onto, which means a lot of water droplets making their way back down to the bottom. Conversely, when you have one egg, there is less cold area for water to condense onto, so most of the steam goes out of the top of the cooker, which means less droplets make it back into the water. Therefore, you need more water, since a larger percent of that water is escaping, to produce the same firmness of egg and the same cooking time as multiple eggs.

The way the timer works is a bit more technical and I haven't taken one apart yet to find out which of the two mechanisms I'm thinking of is used, so can't tell you for sure HOW it works, but I can tell you WHY it works. Water boils when heat is transferred to it, we know that much. There's a heating element under the metal bowl at the bottom of the cooker, which transfers heat through the bowl, into the water. But we can also think about it as the water cooling down the bowl, and thus the heating element, because that is also happening at the same time. As long as the water is cooler than the heating element, which it is all the way up until it turns to steam and is no longer touching the bowl, it is stealing heat from the element and keeping it at a steady temperature. Once all the water boils off, the heating element can no longer stay cool, and rapidly heats up. That's when the cooker decides to turn off and voila! Perfectly cooked eggs.

The great thing about how they work is that the whole process is very easily reproducible, allowing for perfect eggs every time as long as you put the proper amount of water into it.

Hope that helps!

2

brknsoul t1_jaao2nz wrote

One (1) is not the same as Eleven (11). 11 is not 1 and 1, it's Ten more than One.

If you have 11 people, and want to give them each 11 apples, you'll need 121 apples.

2

Any-Growth8158 t1_jaanqnl wrote

When it took months to cross an ocean no one really cared. Everyone just used their own local time. Most people didn't need to subdivide time that accurately. Sun comes up you work. Sun goes down work is done. Sun is at the highest point in the sky it's noon. The fact that the time wasn't the exact same as a town a several miles and hours away by foot (or horse) didn't matter.

6

Veritas3333 t1_jaanasq wrote

To help clear up some confusion, what gets used up is "Dissolved Oxygen", which is oxygen that's in the water, that fish and plants need to survive. Fish and plants aren't separating the hydrogen and the oxygen in the water molecules, they're using the dissolved oxygen suspended in the water.

Some ways to aerate water are fountains, bubblers, or in the case of flowing water you just put a bunch of rocks in the water to create rapids, also called riffles.

33