Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive

Upper-Wolf6040 t1_iuct7nw wrote

The brain and how it perceives colours is an interesting thing. Take magenta for example, in reality that colour doesn't exist but it's our brains filling it un to make sense for us. Also the colour yellow is seen by everyone differently as our eyes only have red, blue and green rods so it takes information from the green and red cones and fills in the blanks. I'm sure I read somewhere that goldfish have yellow rods un their eyes so can truly see what the colour yellow us. Also look up about impossible colours, it's fascinating what our brains do and how we perceive what we "see" is just the brains interpretation of data/information.

0

hiricinee t1_iuct676 wrote

For reference, their net worth is generally a measure of the market cap of a company they are largely owner in, but the proportion of that company they own.

Most of these companies market cap is tens to hundreds of times the earnings these companies make annually.

So the fair comparison would be something like, if that billionaire had a net worth that was tens to hundreds of times the size of a country.

The problem is that its a tough comparison, since the act of gaining ownership of a country isn't easy. Most countries that would be reasonably valued as a company with a market cap of 10 billion aren't just going to let you buy them or even part of them.

−1

ViskerRatio t1_iucs3rp wrote

GDP is how much a nation produces in a year. Being a billionaire is about wealth. So you're trying to compare two different things - it's like asking whether the distance from New York to Chicago is faster than a Porsche.

Probably the question you're getting at is: could a billionaire buy all the goods/services of an entire nation?

To which the answer is "almost certainly not". With the exception of unusual microstates, the value of real property is those nations easily exceeds the liquid assets of any billionaire because as you start buying up that property, the cost of the remaining property explodes in value.

0

Lonely_whatever t1_iucrvvg wrote

Inalmostallcasesitispossibletoreadwithoutbreaks. Not very convenient but I think operators would get used to. So why did they not skip it? Or is it not time critical?

I guess I am thinking from the modern Era perspective where we are trying to compress data/time to send as much as possible

16

Outcasted_introvert t1_iucru0t wrote

I guess with practice they learnt to do it naturally, like listening to speech. When we listen to someone talk, we can distinguish between syllables within a word or in separate words.

Edit: usually. I have poor hearing and I just realised that part of the problem is words blending into each other.

142

purple_pixie t1_iucqqis wrote

It's binary - sound or silence.

If different-length silences are all the same character, so are different-length sounds.

You could say it has 5 characters (dot, dash, 3 different blanks) or 2, but 3 doesn't make any sense.

5