Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive
AnglerJared t1_iudvfqz wrote
Reply to comment by bradland in ELI5: When a bottle of whisky says 25 years, did they really make millions of gallons of that whisky 25 years ago? by wagmoo
Oh, yeah? Then explain parking meters, smarty-pants.
FullBoat29 t1_iudvcen wrote
Reply to ELI5: When a bottle of whisky says 25 years, did they really make millions of gallons of that whisky 25 years ago? by wagmoo
You can Google for pictures of the storage of some of them. They're kept in a big storehouse from floor to ceiling.
[deleted] t1_iudvb1e wrote
Reply to comment by wagmoo in ELI5: When a bottle of whisky says 25 years, did they really make millions of gallons of that whisky 25 years ago? by wagmoo
[deleted]
bradland t1_iudv8rb wrote
Reply to comment by wagmoo in ELI5: When a bottle of whisky says 25 years, did they really make millions of gallons of that whisky 25 years ago? by wagmoo
Yep. That’s what makes some aged whiskey so expensive. You can’t buy time.
wagmoo OP t1_iudv786 wrote
Reply to comment by phiwong in ELI5: When a bottle of whisky says 25 years, did they really make millions of gallons of that whisky 25 years ago? by wagmoo
And then from these batches they bottle some for cheaper and then store others to 'age'? Then that's why there are others that doesn't say any number of years and other 10, 12, 18, and so on?
max_p0wer t1_iudv5bw wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why can we see differences between 60, 144, 165 and 240hz if the eye only can process 60fps? by Xyraph
Let's say you're watching a fast moving object. First it's here [X ]. Then it's here [ X]. If you're playing a video game and it moves that distance between frames, that's what you'll see. If you're watching a movie, you'll see something more like this [XXXXXX ] followed by [ XXXXXX] because there's motion blur. That's why a 24fps movie will seem much smoother than 24fps video game. It's because it's capturing the motion blur.
Now video games could simulate motion blur, but it's computationally expensive, and easier to just make many more frames and let your eyes/brain fill in the blur.
_Connor t1_iudv4yg wrote
Reply to ELI5: When a bottle of whisky says 25 years, did they really make millions of gallons of that whisky 25 years ago? by wagmoo
They don't make one batch of whiskey and then sit on only that batch for 12 / 15 / 25 years until they can/want to sell it.
They're barreling whiskey every year, and every year they're also bottling whiskey that has been aging in barrels for X amount of time. So it's essentially just a revolving door of barreling and bottling.
So for example, a 3 year aged cycle would look like this:
Barrelled / Bottled
1 / 0
2 / 0
3 / 0
4 / 1
5 / 2
6 / 3
After the first 3 years, you then have a constant supply of 3 year old whisky. Companies putting out 15 / 25 year old bottles aren't just selling those. They definitely have more short-term aged whisky that they sell in the meantime. But they also likely have batches of 15 year old whisky that come of age on a yearly basis.
Flair_Helper t1_iudv2s8 wrote
Reply to ELI5: When a bottle of whisky says 25 years, did they really make millions of gallons of that whisky 25 years ago? by wagmoo
Please read this entire message
Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
Straightforward or factual queries are not allowed on ELI5. ELI5 is meant for simplifying complex concepts.
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.
wagmoo OP t1_iuduykz wrote
Reply to comment by Bart-MS in ELI5: When a bottle of whisky says 25 years, did they really make millions of gallons of that whisky 25 years ago? by wagmoo
Cool. So when you drink those expensive 25 year bottles, they are literally 25 years?
phiwong t1_iudux2a wrote
Reply to ELI5: When a bottle of whisky says 25 years, did they really make millions of gallons of that whisky 25 years ago? by wagmoo
Yes. From any reputable and regulated maker of whiskey, if they claim the whiskey is XX years old, it has to be aged at least XX years.
A large distillery probably makes a thousand barrels a day and a small one perhaps tens of barrels a day.
Sparky81 t1_iuduv9d wrote
Reply to comment by wagmoo in ELI5: When a bottle of whisky says 25 years, did they really make millions of gallons of that whisky 25 years ago? by wagmoo
From the time it was barreled to the time it was bottled.
wagmoo OP t1_iuduru8 wrote
Reply to comment by Sparky81 in ELI5: When a bottle of whisky says 25 years, did they really make millions of gallons of that whisky 25 years ago? by wagmoo
What do they base the age on? Like how long it has been in the barrel?
Bart-MS t1_iudur0g wrote
Reply to ELI5: When a bottle of whisky says 25 years, did they really make millions of gallons of that whisky 25 years ago? by wagmoo
Not millions but thousands. And they made even more than actually will be sold because of the "angels share" which is the amount of fluid that evaporates during that time.
bah77 t1_iudun7n wrote
Reply to comment by EspritFort in ELI5: what is the point of chewing food thoroughly if your stomach will digest everything anyway? by Dacadey
Does it, or do you just not notice 500 little bits of corn rather than one whole bit when it comes out the other side?
Sparky81 t1_iudujms wrote
Reply to ELI5: When a bottle of whisky says 25 years, did they really make millions of gallons of that whisky 25 years ago? by wagmoo
Yes. It's a constant process. They make huge batches and store them large barrels for at least 3 years. So it may not be exactly 25 years ago, but it was aged in one of those barrels for 25 years.
[deleted] t1_iudufew wrote
ntilley905 t1_iuduay8 wrote
Reply to comment by powelly in ELI5: Morse code is made up of dots and dashes. How did telegraph operators keep from losing track of where one letter ended and another began? by copperdomebodhi
Yep, it’s called a fist. In the r/AmateurRadio world we still use Morse code sometimes and I can usually identify someone based on their fist before they’ve fully identified themselves if it’s someone I talk to a lot.
idify t1_iuduahn wrote
p28h t1_iudu8pm wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why can we see differences between 60, 144, 165 and 240hz if the eye only can process 60fps? by Xyraph
Nothing biological processes on a 'clock'. The closest thing we have is our heart, which is a terrible clock. It also doesn't stop everything else the instant it stutters (it takes a little while), which is a good thing for our survival.
Human eyes see the world through light, color, and sometimes motion. It's our brains that are adding most of the 'motion' that we see on a screen, and our brain is what limits/acknowledges the effects of different FPS. Because our brains are both good at ignoring details and can be trained, different FPS's work for different purposes.
'Cinematic' 24 FPS works in movies because we have been trained to accept it, but if we are controlling something on the screen we are more focused and we can notice differences easier. Comparisons are also easy to see the differences, because we are focusing on them.
(Also, an occasional cinematic trick is to have different FPS things on screen at once. It usually adds to the Uncanny effect, because the screen is doing something against what we were trained to expect)
PM_ur_Rump t1_iudu69u wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why is it easy to drink a large volume of beer, compared to such a large volume of any other liquid? by Proof_Objective_5704
The diuretic effect might have something to do with it. Beer makes ya pee. If you keep peeing, you keep drinking. There is still generally a net hydrating factor, but not as much as water or other less diuretic liquids.
I know I am basically bottomless if I get into the PBR while camping and/or snowboarding. But I'm gonna be peeing like 30 times that day.
Unclerojelio t1_iudu1xv wrote
Reply to ELI5: Morse code is made up of dots and dashes. How did telegraph operators keep from losing track of where one letter ended and another began? by copperdomebodhi
Morse code is full of acronyms and idioms. The sound of these are recognized as whole words.
[deleted] t1_iudu1qr wrote
Ok_Pizza4090 t1_iudtzgx wrote
Not exactly 'help a burn heal'. Cold water, immediately applied will stop the burning process in its tracks. Right after a burn occurs, the flesh is still hot and damages the surrounding area, making the burn worse. Cold water stops this and in addition, temporarily relieves the pain. First aid = cold, clean water. not ice cold, not a forceful stream. Never ice, never butter, yes clean,dry bandage, yes get medical help quickly, if anything other than a very small burn not on a sensitive area, that is just a mild reddening of the skin.
kd7wrc t1_iudvg7g wrote
Reply to ELI5: Morse code is made up of dots and dashes. How did telegraph operators keep from losing track of where one letter ended and another began? by copperdomebodhi
The thing that i haven't seen anyone mention is that don't ever go by what you see in movies. If they are doing something not many people understand, for example Morse code, they will do the bare minimum to make it understood what they are doing. They will put zero effort into making it technically accurate.