Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive
abat6294 t1_iuftxkh wrote
Reply to comment by Em_Adespoton in ELI5: I was looking into gravity and energy and discovered why you can't harness energy from gravity. Carry bowling ball up a hill, let it fall from a cliff, the energy doesn't come from gravity, but from you carrying it up the hill, potential energy? I then pictured it as charging aKamehameha? ELI5 by Comprehensive_Tap131
Oh, well right, he's just stating one example of the conservation of energy.
Niirah t1_iuftuv1 wrote
Reply to ELI5 Are there any practical alternative fuel sources that alien civilizations might have if they weren't lucky enough to have oil and trees? by retsot
Steam, solar, electrical, geothermal, wind… all of these power sources are practical and reliable.
Em_Adespoton t1_iuftst4 wrote
Reply to comment by abat6294 in ELI5: I was looking into gravity and energy and discovered why you can't harness energy from gravity. Carry bowling ball up a hill, let it fall from a cliff, the energy doesn't come from gravity, but from you carrying it up the hill, potential energy? I then pictured it as charging aKamehameha? ELI5 by Comprehensive_Tap131
His point is that the energy doesn’t come from gravitational force, but from (in that case) solar energy, as the water was lifted out of the ocean and dumped on mountains via solar thermal energy. Gravity is zero-sum.
However, this still misses the point that ALL energy is zero-sum — energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed. Once deposited on a mountain, gravitational force overcomes solar energy so the energy used to spin a turbine is stored as potential energy, to be released as kinetic energy when the snow later melts and flows through the turbine.
abat6294 t1_iuft1x6 wrote
Reply to ELI5: I was looking into gravity and energy and discovered why you can't harness energy from gravity. Carry bowling ball up a hill, let it fall from a cliff, the energy doesn't come from gravity, but from you carrying it up the hill, potential energy? I then pictured it as charging aKamehameha? ELI5 by Comprehensive_Tap131
You didn't even ask a question..
We harness energy from gravity all the time. A significant portion of the world's energy comes from water turbines which are spun by water falling - because of gravity.
koalaposse t1_iufswi8 wrote
Reply to comment by tobi437u in ELI5 Why are airport ceiling so high? by TrShry
Wow! That is so great to learn that height reduces noise? Must be one of the reasons it is so appealing in a sensory way, had not realised this! Makes so much sense.
Usually you hear - repeatedly, domestically that height is very expensive due to material costs, where it seems everything is almost only just above door height in many developer builds.
tsunami141 t1_iufsfky wrote
Reply to comment by CavemanRobot in ELI5 Why are airport ceiling so high? by TrShry
All customs areas at smaller international airports lol.
justmyfakename t1_iufs7u9 wrote
Reply to ELI5 Why are airport ceiling so high? by TrShry
In the airport where I work, the public areas are all tall ceilings 40 to 60 foot. I see lots of posts talking about baggage, etc. At my airport at least, that's all underground... As far down as the ceilings are high. We have several sublevels, including a dedicated level just for baggage handling, and another just for utilities, etc.
Relevant_Sail_7336 OP t1_iufs6hp wrote
Reply to comment by rshenanigens in Eli5: What is the bodies process of breaking out in hives? by Relevant_Sail_7336
Ah thanks. Interesting. I’ve been on a wild medical journey the past five years. Have been to so many specialists and still have no answers. My blood work shows high levels of eosinophils and I am ANA positive. Have had worsening broken capillaries for about five years - started on face and now down to chest. Hives and severe itching started within last few months/weeks.
zoinkability t1_iufs589 wrote
Reply to comment by TehWildMan_ in ELI5 Why are airport ceiling so high? by TrShry
The exhibit A for this is the 60s Penn Station in Manhattan. They kept the basic functionality of the station but by putting it in a bunch of tunnels they turned it into a claustrophobic, unpleasant place.
koalaposse t1_iufs3xd wrote
Reply to comment by Klai8 in ELI5 Why are airport ceiling so high? by TrShry
This is interesting. Do similar mass of people go through other places and systems that are more enclosed in other areas of life, or does all architecture design for this in the same way? Thinking sports, trains and concerts.
CavemanRobot t1_iufrytr wrote
Reply to comment by JeffSergeant in ELI5 Why are airport ceiling so high? by TrShry
Just go to O'hare if you want to try that.
Gyvon t1_iufrxfb wrote
Reply to ELI5 How did knights participate in tournaments like jousting without killing themselves? by QuantumHamster
Jousting required specialized equipment.
Primarily, heavier armor. A full suit of normal plate weighed about sixty pounds. Hefty, but that's similar to what a modern soldier carries into battle, and knights were surprisingly mobile. Jousting armor was much heavier and thicker, especially in the torso, by comparison.
Also, the lances were designed to limit penetration, either by blunting it or other methods to spread out the point of impact.
However, fact is that jousting was very dangerous and there were several fatalities over the centuries.
EVenbeRi t1_iufrp8x wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why do we have real numbers with one term, complex numbers with two terms, quaternions with four terms, octonions and so on, and nothing in between? by wah_bsdk
The key fact is that the arithmetic with those number systems implies that they have a special geometry to them (I'll try to say a little about what that means below). But this relationship to geometry constrains what dimensions these number systems can occur in. So 1, 2, 4, and 8 are the only ones where the number systems have the required special properties ("size" of numbers and inverse to multiplication are the crucial properties, but it gets more technical).
(Actually, 8 is a stretch; the octionions don't have associative multiplication, but they almost do. And there is a number system in dimension 16 that's even more of a stretch, but that's really it, for these types of number systems. The corresponding geometry is just too special to happen outside of these dimensions.)
This connection between arithmetic and geometry is really deep, and took mathematicians a loooonng time to figure out. It's not a coincidence that the only special dimensions are powers of two. If you are willing to have fewer special properties on your number system, so the corresponding geometry is less special, then you can have those number systems in other dimensions.
Here's an eli5 version of what I mean about the correspondence between number systems and geometry:
-
Real numbers describe forward/backward motion (by addition) and scaling (by multiplication).
-
Complex numbers describe rotation (by multiplication); their addition isn't significantly new.
-
Quaternion multiplication (dimension 4) describes something more intricate having to do with twists that result from rotation (like when could cords become weirdly tisted).
-
Octionions are even more tricky to describe; I don't think I can try here.
thewaynegibbons t1_iufqznc wrote
Reply to comment by Beneficial-Car-3959 in ELI5 Why are airport ceiling so high? by TrShry
Source? Genuine question, not doubting you.
apple-masher t1_iufpzn6 wrote
Reply to comment by Uselessmedics in ELI5 How did knights participate in tournaments like jousting without killing themselves? by QuantumHamster
They actually had complex scoring systems where you got points for splintering your lance, or hitting certain body parts. obviously you got the most points for knocking your opponent off their horse. Each match usually consisted of four bouts, so even if you got un-horsed, you could potentially come back and win.
RhynoD t1_iufpv5m wrote
Ceramic is very hard. Not in the general, colloquial sense of hard, but in the Mohs Hardness Scale. That scale measures whether or not something can scratch something else. Diamond is the hardest on this scale - not because you can't break diamond. Diamonds are pretty brittle, you can easily crack or shatter them with a hammer. But you can't scratch them.
Tempered glass is made by putting the glass in tension. You cool the glass so that the outside shrinks, compressing the still-hot inside. When the inside then cools, the outside is frozen in place so the inside pulls tightly on it the inside contracts. The glass pulling on itself keeps the molecules from moving, and holds it all together strongly so it's very hard to break.
By scratching the surface, ceramic breaks the tension, releasing all of it throughout the glass.
152centimetres t1_iufpt51 wrote
Reply to comment by Justgame32 in ELI5: Why are you more likely to get sick if you get drenched in the rain? by Rockin_N
but of course, most people arent spending more than a couple hours at most in the rain, and are hopefully drying off after, so it usually doesn't actually get you sick
DTux5249 t1_iufp766 wrote
Reply to comment by Beneficial-Car-3959 in ELI5 Why are airport ceiling so high? by TrShry
This is why cold blooded creatures are superior life forms; We waste so much energy mindlessly, while a reptile has an excuse to sit back and back bask for hours on end
WilliamMinorsWords t1_iufop1k wrote
Reply to comment by jensjoy in ELI5: what are Pantone colours and how can they charge you for them? by jambo5600
I think this just came out in the last couple of days, so don't feel like you're out of the loop or anything.
Adobe is becoming like the Amazon of design. They are acquiring everything, and unfortunately, we can't do our jobs with it. They acquired a major SaaS company, and now they're running wild with the subscription model.
Last week was the Adobe MAX conference, and they've now structured it so that all the good sessions are in person, and the virtual sessions I attended were absolute crap.
I've been an Adobe user since Illustrator88, but I feel like they've just jumped the shark at this point.
[deleted] t1_iufodww wrote
[deleted]
Purplekeyboard t1_iufoaou wrote
You aren't. This is an "old wives' tale". Our immune systems are far more robust than this.
Justgame32 t1_iufo8qa wrote
More energy spent on keeping your body warm = less energy going towards your immune system = more sick
[deleted] t1_iufo844 wrote
[removed]
Ghostdr1 t1_iufo6q0 wrote
You're not, illnesses like colds etc are caused by viruses that you catch from other people. In winter time, viruses circulate more because people spend more time indoors because of the weather and it's easier to spread a virus indoors(lack of ventilation etc).
pseudocultist t1_iufu32h wrote
Reply to comment by luxfx in ELI5: Why do squirrels spin their tail before jumping? by twitter001
Checking to make sure the tail doesn't have anything stuck to it, isn't encumbered, isn't suddenly missing a bunch of fur.