Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive

Turbo4kq t1_iugsnot wrote

Also, metallurgy has improved greatly over the last 50 years or so. This allows engines to be built from better stuff, which can be machined to closer tolerances. Back in the 60s, you expected to do a top end rebuild inside of 100k miles. Now we frequently see engines go 250-300k or more without any major maintenance. Computer aided design allows better modeling of fluid flows. Lots of electronics inc cars these days, controlling every aspect of the vehicle. They will even tell you what's wrong with the car, something the 60s mechanic could only dream about.

8

epalms t1_iugs7e8 wrote

It could be done, however due to sheer numbers it would be a catastrophic strain on the environment. Can you imagine if 700+ million people just started cutting down trees in order to heat their home all winter? That coupled with the fact that most homes are not equipped with any heat source outside of the natural gas/electric furnace they were built with.

18

Luckbot t1_iugrvny wrote

Laws and investments.

Medieval people survived the cold by making fire inside their homes, today you have to fulfill regulations to do that (I.E. you need a proper fireplace and chimney). Just adding those to an existing home can be expensive, and at least in my area they are pretty much sold out.

In medieval times population was much lower, so it was viable to just heat every home with wood. If you tried that now we'd run out of forests quickly, and dense cities would be dark in the smoke

8

FlyJunior172 t1_iugqqcj wrote

The numbers you’re hearing are linear speed, not angular speed.

vᵣ=rω where v is the linear speed, r is the radius of rotation and ω is the angular speed.

For earth, r = 3950 mi, and ω = 15°/h. This gives vᵣ= 3950×15×π÷180=1034.107666 mi/h (π÷180 is just a unit conversion) at the equator. Sound familiar?

Now, what really matters is ω - that 15°/h. This is half the angular speed of the hour hand on a clock. The hour hand on a clock goes around twice in a day, which works out to 30°/h. That’s not a movement we can easily perceive when viewed from altitudes like the one the Blue Marble photo was taken at, the perspective we have of the earth is very similar to the perspective we have of a clock. The angular speed is just slow enough we can’t perceive it.

Edit: unit errors in my math

1

DidNotSeeThi t1_iugql7p wrote

Short answer: Better combustion efficiency, airflow, fuel control and lots more RPM.

HP = (Torque(lb/ft) * RPM)/5280

The original horse power was one horse lifting 1 pound 1 mile (5280 feet) in one minute

So a motorcycle example, BMW R1000rr ~1 liter displacement 205hp @ 13,000 rpm is over 200hp / liter naturally aspirated. The bike still makes ~83 lb/ft of torque at 13,000 rpm. Enough fuel and air into the engine though the injectors. Then the correct compression, ignition and power stroke. Then the whole motor is designed to be optimal for this power.

Nothing off of a race track was spinning 13,000 RPM in the 1970's..

2

MrWedge18 t1_iugqhll wrote

"For every action, there's an equal and opposite reaction"

Basically, what it's saying is forces always comes in pairs. For every force, there's an equal force in the opposite direction.

The force pushing air out of a balloon has an equal and opposite force that pushes the balloon forward.

The force from a boat's propeller pushing water backwards has an equal and opposite force that pushes the boat forwards.

The force that shoots a bullet out of a gun has an equal and opposite force that causes the gun to recoil.

3

TucsonTacos t1_iugqdb4 wrote

I used to live there, and it gets even colder than that. If I had to guess I would say residual heat? Possibly something engineered with the hot water being next to the cold water pipes? I really have no idea but it was a comfortable temperature every time I went during winter.

4