And Elbridge Gerry who the technique is named after pronounced his name with a hard G.

Yeah but 100c is boiling point, and 212 is boiling point, so half the boiling point of one should be half the boiling point of the other, right?

Theres also not much evolutionary pressure for plants to develop the ability to do this themselves since nitrogen availability usually isn’t as much of a problem for wild plants that aren’t getting constantly harvested and replanted rather than dying and decomposing naturally allowing their nutrients to return to the soil (also evolving an entirely new metabolic pathway with new enzymes and everything would take at least several million years)

[removed]

[removed]

0 degrees Fahrenheit and 0 degrees Celsius aren't the same temperature.

Instead 0°C = 32°F

[removed]

People who spoke English invaded and occupied large portions of the planet. At a certain point, the locals started learning the language of the invaders, and many years later here we are.

[removed]

[deleted]

Say you have a population of 50 people that all live in the same town and all of them are in M/F couples (so 26 couples) and over a year every single one of them have a baby, so 26 babies.

Now you have a total town population of 76.

Now lets take that exact same town but there's 100 people living in it. Same deal, all of them are in couples, but this time only half of the couples have children (so 50 couples, 25 children) now there's a total population of 125 in the town.

The first town has a much higher birth rate, but the second town is more crowded.

I just wonder why we can't do the opposite: tell the computer to accurately represent the actual voting community as closely as possible, mathematically as perfect as we can get (without eliminating the electoral college, which would be better, but old habits (and people with money and power) die hard.

[removed]

Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):

Loaded questions, or ones based on a false premise, are not allowed on ELI5 (Rule 6).

If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this was removed erroneously, please use this form first. If you believe this was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.

[removed]

[removed]

States of matter are determined by the energy of the matter and how its bond conform inside the material. The human body holds a rigid shape and doesn't just puddle into whatever container it's in. How soft pliable or squishy something is doesn't matter, only how it does or doesn't hold itself together

Is a grape a solid? Is it more or less solid than a raisin?

A raisin is 15% or less water, and a grape is about 75% water. The difference in size is purely based on the removed water.

People, like grapes, can have physical structures that store a lot of water while having a relatively solid outer surface.

Gerrymandering is the winning side's ability to redraw congressional districts to give themselves an advantage.

In simple terms: Say you have a minority group that votes 'X' surrounded on four sides that vote 'y'. In reality you have five groups, four Y and one X.

The people who control such things redraw the lines, so that the 'X' group is broken up and merged into the predominantly 'Y' groups. The end result would be five 'Y' groups. Basically the 'X' groups votes are watered down.

This is done by all parties, whoever is in power at the time. It is allowed because it is necessary to re-draw the districts over time.

It has no bearing on the Presidential or Senatorial races. Just the House of Representatives and local elections.

You could probably ask the same about boxing, UFC, freeclimbing, rugby, Formula 1, etc..

If there's a dangerous sport then some people will want to do it. And if jousting was still a thing then people would probably be lining up to participate.

[removed]

Gerrymandering can be a good or bad thing. Let's say an area can elect three representatives, and lets say a third of the population is a minority group which lives spread across two or three neighbourhoods and usually votes for party A, while the rest of the population usually votes for Party B.

If you encircle those minority neighbourhoods into one district, then the minority can essentially elect one of the three representatives. If you divide up the minority group so they are spread across all three districts, then their votes may not count.

[removed]

To add on this. You and a friend are astronauts in space, holding hands. We are a system. Our center of mass is between us. If you push on your friend, no EXTERNAL force acted on the system you + friend, so your center of mass shouldn't change its state of motion. For this to happen, a net force of 0 should happen between you two. Ergo, any force you apply will be reflected back to you.

But then wouldn't stuff never ever move? If forces were always equal to 0? The point is that the system you + friend experience 0 external forces, and no motion. But if you look at the system only friend he experienced an EXTERNAL force (you pushing) And if you look at the system only you, you experience an EXTERNAL force equal to your push reflected.

Each of you moves, but the overall system does not change.

>Minnesota will routinely get to 10 degrees, even zero degrees, in the middle of January at night.

This made me laugh. As a lifelong Minnesotan, you're nearly 50 degrees too warm on that estimate!