Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive
ShankThatSnitch t1_ixn0xaa wrote
Reply to comment by jaa101 in ELI5: Why does eating sweet things makes us thirsty immediately? by emremirrath
I am very much not a diabetic nor pre-diabetic, and I get thirsty if I eat stuff that is too sweet. So although you may be right about OP, this is not an automatic conclusion at all. Sugar acts similarly on your cells as salt, is regard to sapping them of their water content. That is why sugar works as a preservative the way salt does.
[deleted] t1_ixn0ok4 wrote
Reply to comment by jaa101 in ELI5: Why does eating sweet things makes us thirsty immediately? by emremirrath
[deleted]
CaptMcPlatypus t1_ixmwhsz wrote
A lot of older people are lonely too. It's hard to say no to a friendly face who has taken time for you. Even more so when saying yes will get you more interaction.
dont-YOLO-ragequit t1_ixmv416 wrote
Old people tend to get tired and bored after retirement which can go into anything to get someone's attention, mental weakness as to something as basic as saying no to persistent people and believing they are taking on a new adventure.
Solicitors know this and take advantage of this. This is why political officials love to go by senior homes near election campaings, why your parents can go in a dealer with a beater compact and come out with the Fully loaded new version of the same model with ridiculous APR, why telemarketers used to get a game face as soon as an old grandma would be on the line ect.
On the other end, the Phone, the TV and buttons are what they used to live by, some kept up and are into social media, layered menus and verifying sources while others will still think if it came from the phone and is a polite person then it must be true.
[deleted] t1_ixmu6ca wrote
[deleted]
Omphalopsychian t1_ixmry1z wrote
8% of people ages 65-69 have mild cognitive impairment. The frequency increases with age.
Source: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/17990-mild-cognitive-impairment
Snoo93226 t1_ixmrgvf wrote
Reply to comment by unskilledplay in ELI5: Why do humans like music? by [deleted]
It's also on Spotify
Divinate_ME t1_ixmqzom wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why couldn't something that says "Cook at 400 degrees for 15 minutes" theoretically be cooked at 6000 degrees for 1 minute? by BitchImLilBaby
Time and temperature are not equal parts of the equation. If you subject something to the surface temperature of the sun for a minute, it will not turn out well done. This is because the surrounding molecules are moving that incredibly quickly that your cake or whatever would burn to a crisp.
[deleted] t1_ixmqf7m wrote
[removed]
j_dext t1_ixmq0ld wrote
Speaking for my dad he really wants to quickly become rich. He always has. So he wants to believe these scams.
When he passed we gave up trying to unravel all these websites and emails and folks taking money out of his accounts. It was too much.
Doraellen t1_ixmppdo wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why couldn't something that says "Cook at 400 degrees for 15 minutes" theoretically be cooked at 6000 degrees for 1 minute? by BitchImLilBaby
Lots of good explanations here. Essentially we usually want to make sure something cooks through without burning on the outside, and thermal transfer takes time. Most baking temps top out around 450F, except commercial pizza ovens, which can be as hot as 1000F and do bake a pizza in literally one or two minutes. That works because pizzas are flat and thin, and cook through quickly.
Just adding that smaller changes in time/temp are used deliberately by cooks and bakers all of the time. It's common for muffin recipes to have the first 10 minutes of cook time at 50 F higher to activate the baking powder and make them rise quickly. Then the oven gets turned down to make sure they bake through without burning. Likewise it's common to sear meat at high heat in a pan and then put it in the oven at a lower temp to cook through.
But there are actually lots of examples of the opposite of your question--cooking something longer at a lower temp. Immersion cooking (sous vide) uses pretty low temps (less than 200F) and can hold a protein at that temp for hours without overcooking. A crock pot or slow cooker also uses this "low and slow" method.
[deleted] t1_ixmpdck wrote
[removed]
jimkurth81 t1_ixmp8e0 wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why do humans like music? by [deleted]
To quote a famous blind person, “Music is a world within itself With a language we all understand With an equal opportunity For all to sing, dance and clap their hands”
shastadakota t1_ixmoz7b wrote
Judging by my parents, they tend to trust people. They are from a different era. Keep an eye on what your parents are doing. Talk to them. Ask if you sense anything fishy. My mother was scammed by an investment person who had a "seminar" at her church! He put her into high commission annuities that were totally inappropriate for a senior. He wouldn't talk to my sister or me to discuss what he did.
[deleted] t1_ixmox98 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixmo1ia wrote
[removed]
No-Watercress-3720 t1_ixmnw4c wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why do humans like music? by [deleted]
It’s called pattern recognition, for example rhyming is a thing people are attracted to which is commonly In rap. People usually find music attracting because of all the similar patterns or rhyming words.
Brennir10 t1_ixmlbbd wrote
Reply to comment by loverlyone in eli5 is there a scientific explanation or reason for intrusive thoughts or call of the void by DapperWheel521
So —this is based on the theory that emotions are names for body states. Ie it’s not I am thinking about a test and feel anxious and then I get nauseous. Instead how emotions work is basically brain which already knows about the test is sending out various chemicals that are increasing your heart rate, increasing gut motility etc—and as a very small child you learn to name that feeling as fear. Your body is sending out chemical signals etc before you KNOW you are scared.
So you ought to learn “ everything in the gut is going at a normal rate, no changes in blood flow or digestion”= a peaceful state, contentment etc
Same with cardiovascular responses: your heart , diaphragm, lungs etc responds to things and you learn to name the response in some way—sadness, excitement etc.
Depending on your brain chemistry and your upbringing your name for the response may or may not be congruent with what is really happening in your life. For example I had an abusive childhood and was afraid a LOT. I learned that it’s “fear” and “bad things are going to happen” if my heart rate increased, stomach motility increased etc.Now when I am excited about something like a vacation, I will initially name the sensations in my body as “fear”—-sometimes to the point of wanting to cancel the thing I am excited about. I had. To do a lot of body centered therapy to rewire my names for my body’s responses and I had grown up in a dangerous environment so I tended to interpret any kind of arousal as a negative emotion.
It sounds like they are saying that people who ruminate negatively a lot have become insensitive to their bodies messages. So even though their stomachs are calm, heart beating normal, all the things that say things are ok in the world—-they cognitively are still feeling life is going badly. They aren’t receiving the messages from their body saying everything is actually pretty ok right now
Of course it’s really pretty complicated but if you struggle with anxiety or negative emotions interoception is very interesting to read about.
Brennir10 t1_ixmiq21 wrote
Reply to comment by uniqueUsername_1024 in eli5 is there a scientific explanation or reason for intrusive thoughts or call of the void by DapperWheel521
Was in a similar boat. Have you tried meditation? That did wonders for me. Now when the thought starts to come up I can take a breath, hit pause in my brain, try to understand what in my life might be triggering the thought , and then let the thought go without dwelling on it. Turn my mind to doing something about the current situation that might be triggering the thoughts. I know it is a trite suggestion but it really did work for me. I almost never think about suicide beyond the automatic “maybe I should kill my self “ thought. No rumination or anything
Brennir10 t1_ixmhpoo wrote
Reply to comment by f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4 in eli5 is there a scientific explanation or reason for intrusive thoughts or call of the void by DapperWheel521
Unlikely. Maybe if you call your therapist repeatedly at 3 am threatening to do it but not just talking about it. Suicidal ideation is much more common than people think and is not the same as being actively suicidal. A decent therapist usually knows the difference. I have had suicidal ideation for YEARS ….AND I have easy access to a very definitive method of suicide….and I’ve been in therapy for years and talk about it openly. The only time I was ever kept against my will was when I basically set everything up for the suicide,then got scared bc I wasn’t 100% sure I wanted to die but I was 100% sure I would be dead in a few hours if someone didn’t do something. I told someone who drove me to the ER. Even at the ER if I had the chance to change my mind ( not sure what would have happened then) but didn’t bc I knew if I went home I would kill myself that night. I did get stuck there for a few days which were largely useless but got me through the impulse to die safely. It did cost though I am lucky to have insurance. But It’s not as if the moment you mention suicide you are involuntarily committed, at least not in any of the US states I have lived in
explainlikeimfive-ModTeam t1_ixmecma wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in eli5 is there a scientific explanation or reason for intrusive thoughts or call of the void by DapperWheel521
Please read this entire message
Your comment has been removed for the following reason(s):
- ELI5 does not allow guessing.
Although we recognize many guesses are made in good faith, if you aren’t sure how to explain please don't just guess. The entire comment should not be an educated guess, but if you have an educated guess about a portion of the topic please make it explicitly clear that you do not know absolutely, and clarify which parts of the explanation you're sure of (Rule 8).
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. **If you believe it was removed erroneously, explain why using this form and we will review your submission.
Carthax12 t1_ixmdyoj wrote
The other replies are exactly correct. I was diagnosed a few years ago, and this was my primary symptom.
I waited too long after that symptom on-set, though, and ended up in the ER with heart palpitations, shortness of breath, and flop-sweat.
...and lemme tell ya -- when an overweight, middle-aged white guy stumbles into the ER sweating and re-faced while complaining of chest pain, those nurses haul ass. I went from fully-dressed at the entry door to shirt off in a bed with an EEG hooked up in less than two minutes. There was an IV in within 4 minutes, and the first blood test was heading to the lab within 8 minutes.
Please don't let your symptoms go as far as I did. You are likely still at the stage where you could lose some weight and get rid of your symptoms. Though I lost 15 pounds very quickly after my diagnosis, and lowered my A1C from 7.9 to 6.2 in 3 months, I still have to check my blood sugar daily and be super careful of what I eat.
[deleted] t1_ixm93d6 wrote
[removed]
uniqueUsername_1024 t1_ixm7v6m wrote
Reply to comment by blink-imherebaby in eli5 is there a scientific explanation or reason for intrusive thoughts or call of the void by DapperWheel521
What do you do if you used to be suicidal for so long that suicidal ideation becomes an automatic thought?
I have no real desire to hurt myself, but every time something bad happens to me, my brain goes “What if you [suicide method]?” It’s more than call of the void—it’s a specific and very detailed method using items that aren’t necessarily nearby. (Literally the same thoughts I had when I was actively suicidal.)
Thing is, I don’t want to hurt myself. I like living! But I can’t tell my therapist and risk being hospitalized—if there’s even a 1% chance of that happening, I’ll put up with the thoughts instead. They’re not a danger to me, just stressful and annoying. Is there anything I could research?
ShankThatSnitch t1_ixn1497 wrote
Reply to comment by Jamieflamefame in ELI5: Why does eating sweet things makes us thirsty immediately? by emremirrath
No, this not at all an automatic diabetic conclusion... sugar pulls water out of your cells the same way salt does. Then your cells send the same signals to your brain to make you thirsty. The effect is probably stronger in a diabetic though.