Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive
[deleted] t1_ixsz3kz wrote
[removed]
revenantae t1_ixsz0i7 wrote
Because there is a possibility, no matter how small, that you might create a spark when the car is on. If that happens, there is a chance you might ignite a fire. That COULD cause an explosion, which could then cause a much larger explosion.
Bigdickdiarrhea t1_ixsuuit wrote
Reply to comment by Raving_Lunatic69 in ELI5: Do heist-themed movies&games face any legal difficulties for the fear that they might encourage potential robbers with their smart robbery plans? by [deleted]
I’m just showing that some games do, in fact, have real places… the dude above me said they didn’t…
[deleted] t1_ixsp0b3 wrote
[deleted]
constantino675 t1_ixsow1r wrote
Reply to comment by MummyPanda in ELI5: How are archers “efficient” in combat? by Environmental_Point3
elves were abnormally strong as I recall.
TheAndyMac83 t1_ixsign6 wrote
Reply to comment by hh26 in ELI5: How are archers “efficient” in combat? by Environmental_Point3
On the scale of a full army, half is extremely heavy even; my understanding is that somewhere around a quarter or so is what it takes to defeat an army.
Imagine being in a group of say 10 men, marching towards an enemy position. You get halfway there, but two of your friends are hit by arrows and go down screaming. Sure, you might reason that by the time you make it all the way you'll only lose another two men, but one of those two might be you. At what point do you think "Well heck, the next one arrow's going to hit me!" and decide that you're not walking into that?
Raving_Lunatic69 t1_ixsfcq2 wrote
Reply to comment by GESNodoon in ELI5: Do heist-themed movies&games face any legal difficulties for the fear that they might encourage potential robbers with their smart robbery plans? by [deleted]
No worries, we all goof
explainlikeimfive-ModTeam t1_ixsaplp wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ELI5: Do heist-themed movies&games face any legal difficulties for the fear that they might encourage potential robbers with their smart robbery plans? by [deleted]
Please read this entire message
Your comment has been removed for the following reason(s):
- Rule #1 of ELI5 is to be nice.
Breaking rule 1 is not tolerated.
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. **If you believe it was removed erroneously, explain why using this form and we will review your submission.
[deleted] t1_ixsabyv wrote
Reply to comment by clocks212 in ELI5: How are archers “efficient” in combat? by Environmental_Point3
Not really.
When Hervy II build up Dover castle to basically it's current state (of course minus the gun batteries added centuries later) the cost was ~6500 pounds - with total yearly income being ~10000.
Total tax intake in GB today is ~720 billion pounds - so a fortification equally expensive (65% of yearly tax income) wouldn't merely be "multi-billion" but much more.
Willbilly1221 t1_ixs9yef wrote
Once gas contained inside a pressurized tube escape (inevitably it will escape, balloons shrink too) it cant re pressurize. Entropy dictates that the pressure inside a balloon or tire is trying to stabilize to atmospheric pressure. Only the tire or balloon wall is preventing that from happening. But they all slowly leak regardless which is why you have to re inflate anyway. Cold weather exacerbates this process. Cold temperatures drop pressure which reduces the effectiveness of a good seal on your wheel. Low pressure tires lose air faster than high pressure tires because the shape of the tire with pressure produces a better seal. Once the seal is compromised by temperature change it losses more pressure.
GESNodoon t1_ixs9g7j wrote
MentallyMusing t1_ixs98qa wrote
Reply to comment by GESNodoon in ELI5: Do heist-themed movies&games face any legal difficulties for the fear that they might encourage potential robbers with their smart robbery plans? by [deleted]
So you weren't finished.....
You can have the last word with the next one I promise. I don't want to break your diving board before you jump
GESNodoon t1_ixs93e2 wrote
Reply to comment by MentallyMusing in ELI5: Do heist-themed movies&games face any legal difficulties for the fear that they might encourage potential robbers with their smart robbery plans? by [deleted]
Really, who cares. Go back and do it if you really want to. Have someone else do it. Hire someone to do it. In the end, you are wrong about the facts and your original response did not have anything to do with the original question. That is all I really care about.
I will wait with great anticipation for someone to come along and tell me I see-sawed lol. It will crush me.
MentallyMusing t1_ixs8tnh wrote
Reply to comment by GESNodoon in ELI5: Do heist-themed movies&games face any legal difficulties for the fear that they might encourage potential robbers with their smart robbery plans? by [deleted]
Be well, stranger
MentallyMusing t1_ixs8mub wrote
Reply to comment by MentallyMusing in ELI5: Do heist-themed movies&games face any legal difficulties for the fear that they might encourage potential robbers with their smart robbery plans? by [deleted]
It'd be interesting to see the total number of items that were under discussion in this string of comments and have someone list out what was and was not addressed to see how right either one of us was regarding the things we wrote and who brought up what for dissection of value
xYoSoYx OP t1_ixs8lhk wrote
Reply to comment by TheJeeronian in ELI5: why does tire pressure decrease in the cold? by xYoSoYx
That makes total sense, again - thank you!
GESNodoon t1_ixs8j42 wrote
Reply to comment by MentallyMusing in ELI5: Do heist-themed movies&games face any legal difficulties for the fear that they might encourage potential robbers with their smart robbery plans? by [deleted]
Alrighty. Good fortune to you.
MentallyMusing t1_ixs8d2d wrote
Reply to comment by GESNodoon in ELI5: Do heist-themed movies&games face any legal difficulties for the fear that they might encourage potential robbers with their smart robbery plans? by [deleted]
You should really get your team to turn in the old playbook and get a new strategist . Your behavior has become a "Don't" conversationally and they're letting you get laughed at now
onlytech_nofashion t1_ixs896n wrote
i always imagine the aftermath of a medieval battlefield like a giant Lazarett without any personell or staff, like people without limbs, cut open people etc bleeding out
GESNodoon t1_ixs8588 wrote
Reply to comment by MentallyMusing in ELI5: Do heist-themed movies&games face any legal difficulties for the fear that they might encourage potential robbers with their smart robbery plans? by [deleted]
*you're*
If I was going to insult you, I would. Pointing out that you are wrong and that you seem to lack comprehension is not insulting you. It is pointing out facts.
MentallyMusing t1_ixs7yr6 wrote
Reply to comment by GESNodoon in ELI5: Do heist-themed movies&games face any legal difficulties for the fear that they might encourage potential robbers with their smart robbery plans? by [deleted]
I'm not, it was an ongoing attempt on your part though your too big to admit it
GESNodoon t1_ixs7uvp wrote
Reply to comment by MentallyMusing in ELI5: Do heist-themed movies&games face any legal difficulties for the fear that they might encourage potential robbers with their smart robbery plans? by [deleted]
I have not once insulted you. I am not even sure why you think I have.
MentallyMusing t1_ixs7utb wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ELI5: Do heist-themed movies&games face any legal difficulties for the fear that they might encourage potential robbers with their smart robbery plans? by [deleted]
I'm not surprised
MentallyMusing t1_ixs7nyd wrote
Reply to comment by GESNodoon in ELI5: Do heist-themed movies&games face any legal difficulties for the fear that they might encourage potential robbers with their smart robbery plans? by [deleted]
Hey, how often does continuously insulting someone keep you in the kind of companionship you enjoy online and does that transfer equally as your offline personality or do you play meek, coy and easily frazzled in person
You obviously have zero perception of how you've insulted yourself
tmahfan117 t1_ixszeug wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why do you have to turn your car off when you fill up your tank? by logan0921
It doesn’t, mostly.
You can totally pump gas into a car with the engine running and not have anything explode. As long as the gasoline doesn’t get to the engine or any other part hot enough to ignite it, it won’t explode.
The problem is that people In general are stupid, so removing every possible risk is the best move.