Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive

scarlet_hairstreak t1_iy35u95 wrote

My neighbor, a very white dude with a Germanic last name, is a self-proclaimed Shaman - has a business web site and everything. Husband thinks he is a drug dealer. I think it’s a tax write-off. Either way, he has folks over at the equinoxes and they stand around a fire and beat a drum for a bit.

It’s curious, but so far, harmless.

1

Vilsue t1_iy35fhy wrote

mom is the world bank/general population (the basic source of money)

candy is any commodity like oil

you and your brother are contries/goverments

Stores are commodity producing countries, you are banned from buying in specific places because of politics/sanctions/ custom duties

​

How is it not eli5?

1

QuantumR4ge t1_iy328gn wrote

An in falling observer is a non accelerating observer by definition. An in falling observer is inertial. You are viewing the world from a newtonian perspective. The proper acceleration of an inertial observer, is 0, an observer acting under only gravity is inertial, they are following a geodesic, that’s literally why they are falling. This is essentially what the equivalence principle is telling you. There is no “gravitational force “ pulling you.

In Kruskal-szekeres coordinates you can clearly see the event horizon is not defined for the in falling observer. The event horizon is not defined for observers following a geodesic

You are getting confused here, for reference my specialism is in general relativity, this is the field of research i do.

0

GalFisk t1_iy31wog wrote

Every time an exhaust valve opens in a cylinder, the residual pressure of the exhaust gases is suddenly expelled thorugh the exhaust, causing a loud "pop". In most engines, the pops are regularly spaced, creating a regular "tone". In the V arrangement, two pops happen close after one another, and then there's a longer delay before the next two. This causes the characteristic noise.

1

nmxt t1_iy2zmn5 wrote

The machine in the airport only scans things inside it, it doesn’t leak X-rays outside. In hospital the entire room with the patient is the machine. The reason for this is that it’s not possible to remove a part of a human body, put it in the scanner and then put it back on the body. And full body X-rays would be excessive and unnecessarily dangerous. So they only shoot X-rays through the specific body part in interest while the patient is in the room.

10

Aussie_Mo_Bro t1_iy2zkbm wrote

Unless you have certain underlying medical issues, occasional exposure is fine.

If you're taking an international you're being exposed to more radiation, anyway.

Doctors and nurses go behind a shield because it would be constant radiation over many years. This can and does cause health issues, not limited to cancer, but cancer is a big one

0

QuantumR4ge t1_iy2z05q wrote

That isn’t the reason, the reason you don’t observe time dilation in your own frame is because as an in-falling observer you are not accelerating or in motion (you always see yourself at rest), so for both the in-falling and outside observer to agree on the local speed of light, they must disagree on space and time. (Although a specific combination of these is conserved)

The in falling observer actually can’t even define where the event horizon is

0

Aurinaux3 t1_iy2xi5r wrote

Note that time dilation is not an experience. It is only an observation that is measured by someone else.

If you approached the event horizon of a black hole, then you would just cross it normally. You wouldn't slow down.

If I tried to observe someone crossing the event horizon of a black hole from far away then they would literally never cross it from my frame of reference. And yet, they still do.

3