Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive

Rcomian t1_iy51gew wrote

thanks you for your feedback.

yes, telescopes can pick up and recover sound by registering the distortion on objects in the room. this used to be done with lasers but even that isn't necessary now.

and you might notice that i said in reality we couldn't have a telescope that did that, but we could communicate and see the effect in other ways. like flashing lights at each other.

that's kind of important. we can imagine what we would see, and describe the effects, without worrying about what the physical limitations are. visualising the situation can help with understanding.

my point was that our experience of time doesn't change, but the time we see pass for others does.

I'm sorry if you found the explanation confusing, however.

7

AngryBlitzcrankMain t1_iy50vnl wrote

Usually, separating between what is tool is if you have to "work the tool". Early hominids know how to use stick or stones, but it wasnt until they started to sharpen the sticks and stones when we refered to it as tools, since they were not using stuff normaly found in nature, like certain animals can. This is the same thing.

3

cabalavatar t1_iy50hb0 wrote

Does it really taste better to "most" people? Could be. I've never seen a scientific poll on this (tho I'm gonna go look). But not to me and my family. I've been eating whole wheat foods my whole life (I've eaten mostly home-cooked meals) and strongly prefer the nutty flavour of whole wheat over the blandness of white flour. I usually add just a smidge % more oil/butter to my baking to counteract the slight uptick in perceived dryness, but for tortillas, roti, and naan, I can't tell any difference in dryness, just a nuttier flavour.

Anyway, I think people get used to what they get used to, like how Yanks can't tell that their supermarket white breads are usually basically confectionery.

1

ACMEPrinting t1_iy4ypt5 wrote

2

LARRY_Xilo t1_iy4xwuj wrote

"Processed" is kind of missleading in this case. Whole weed flour is still processed otherwise you would just have a grain and not flour. You just skip one step in the process that is sieving out the other parts. The milling acctually gets more difficult with whole weed if I remeber correctly. So no production cost does not realy change. And yes it makes properties better to bake, though "better" depends on what you want to make. For most comercial products finer grain is usually better and it also tastes sweeter, which is what most people like.

1

phrenos t1_iy4v7m7 wrote

ELY5: Fish have special lungs called gills, which are like a stack of delicate tissue paper, with many layers of thin tissue all sitting next to each other. The surface of each tissue paper needs to not touch its neighbours in order to absorb oxygen from the water. If you soak a stack of tissue paper in water, and then take it out; it will be impossible to peel the tissues apart. This is exactly what happens to fish gills once they leave their water home.

3

Dorocche t1_iy4ug6q wrote

Come on, you have to understand that's not the whole point of the question. When you eat whole wheat bread, you taste and feel that it's not the same as white bread, and OP wants to know what the difference is; it's not health, okay, but what is it?

1

Dorocche t1_iy4u2op wrote

Your point is that the label isn't regulated in the way it should be, and that's true, but it's not true that the whole wheat label is just nothing.

Whole wheat products are qualitatively way different than other products, and OP just wants to know what that difference is.

2

Flair_Helper t1_iy4u044 wrote

Please read this entire message

Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):

  • ELI5 requires that you search the ELI5 subreddit for your topic before posting. Users will often either find a thread that meets their needs or find that their question might qualify for an exception to rule 7. Please see this wiki entry for more details (Rule 7).

If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.

1

Kriss3d t1_iy4to8g wrote

Yes. That's how undelete programs works.

Think of a drive as a book. You got the list in the first part with the pages where each chapter begins and ends and what the chapter is called.

That's in the computer called a partition table.

And instead of a chapter it's a file. But pretty much like that.

So if you want to delete a drive you don't delete the actual pages. You just clear the index page where the name of the chapter is.

So if there's a range of pages that have no chapter name then it means you could replace the chapter with a new chapter ( so to speak) and add a chapter name for it.

This makes formatting a big drive quick. You simply erase all the names in the index.

All the data is technically still there.. But because the index said it's empty, the computer will Just overwrite that part and add a new name in the index.

That's actually exactly how a drive on a computer works. Ans also why you can undelete files or drives if they haven't been overwritten.

1