Recent comments in /f/funny

Alematrix3r t1_j5ge4ic wrote

Interestingly enough, the hammock does make a little sense, as in the event of a crash the forward momentum would be converted into rotational momentum (considering that its a forward crash and not a side crash, and that the material can handle the forces) there was actually a prototype made long time ago for babies that was like a capsule that would close and spin, the baby would have been dizzy but safe, no idea what happened to that prototype. The string though its absurd as it would be a whiplash for the poor kid

1

dasookwat t1_j5g3laq wrote

this would imply a theoretical instant stop situation, where the car it self
and whatever it hits, would not deform. If there's any crumpling of things going on, the car would not stop in an instance, and instead slow down really fast. this compensates for moving over the 90" point depending on how much time it takes for the baby to reach the 90" angle, vs the time it takes the car to stop.

3

dasookwat t1_j5g300m wrote

my guess would be, the baby would be the safest person in a frontal impact car crash because the hammock is somewhat stretchy. a frontal impact would move the hammock forward, and stay there long enough to stop going to the roof. but the baby has no real impact injury because there is no travel distance for the baby. Unless ofcourse the hammock is not strong enough. Then there will be a baby sized projectile going through the front window.

1

AutoModerator t1_j5g2ty7 wrote


>This is a friendly reminder to read our rules. > >Memes, social media, hate-speech, and pornography are not allowed. > >Screenshots of Reddit are expressly forbidden, as are TikTok videos. > >Comics may only be posted on Wednesdays and Sundays. > >Rule-breaking posts may result in bans. > >Please also be wary of spam. >

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1