Recent comments in /f/gadgets
OmNomCakes t1_iscyo9e wrote
Reply to comment by Sleepy_Tortoise in Meta’s VR Headset Harvests Personal Data Right Off Your Face - Cameras inside the device that track eye and face movements can make an avatar’s expressions more realistic, but they raise new privacy questions. by speckz
Exactly. The light sensitivity on your phone can tell enough to be a major security risk if someone was malicious. The accelerometer would tell people your habits down to creepy levels. But God damn if an avatar in a game makes the faces I do AFTER I choose to turn a setting on myself. XD
iamchairs t1_iscylsm wrote
OmNomCakes t1_iscydbh wrote
Reply to comment by FPOWorld in Meta’s VR Headset Harvests Personal Data Right Off Your Face - Cameras inside the device that track eye and face movements can make an avatar’s expressions more realistic, but they raise new privacy questions. by speckz
That's.. usually a physical circuit. Ie if current is present to turn the cam on, the light is on. Please show me a major manufacturer who has a camera that isn't this way.
DrawTheLine87 t1_iscy9xp wrote
I’m guessing this is partly because of the backlash, but I’m more inclined to believe it’s because they got wind of something from AMD….
OmNomCakes t1_iscy7r2 wrote
Reply to comment by iamchairs in Meta’s VR Headset Harvests Personal Data Right Off Your Face - Cameras inside the device that track eye and face movements can make an avatar’s expressions more realistic, but they raise new privacy questions. by speckz
Gauge your audience my dude. These people have no idea how or why tech works. They likely get upset when a phone app wants permission to calls thinking it's listening to them. See the Alexa comment above, they're referencing Alexa having to listen to things that aren't Alexa to know when you say Alexa.
And if you try to explain how software works you're a 'shill'. God forbid you show them how to monitor the actual physical traffic from the devices so they can see for themselves. They'd just say the device must be hiding it!
Probably the same people that say Google ads suck because all they show them is gay porn.
iamchairs t1_iscxhye wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Meta’s VR Headset Harvests Personal Data Right Off Your Face - Cameras inside the device that track eye and face movements can make an avatar’s expressions more realistic, but they raise new privacy questions. by speckz
I've hardly gone out of my way to be pro Meta. I've been fairly neutral the whole time on Meta but I've tried to be objective.
Whenever Meta is in the news we get dozens of these threads that are all the same thing.
Whenever another platform gets caught doing something evil those threads become what-about-facebook threads and, crucially, the thing platform X was doing never actually stops but we all got a good laugh at the old zuck so it's fine.
M-Rich t1_iscx3op wrote
Reply to comment by oNOCo in NVIDIA cancels GeForce RTX 4080 12GB - VideoCardz.com by MorgrainX
I remember how media and press wasn't really convinced the 2070 super was a good deal. But then the whole supplychain thing and COVID happened and boom, best timed purchase ever imo. Super happy with it, will ride it at least one more gen
superandy t1_iscvwue wrote
Reply to comment by ButternutDonut in Two unreleased and 'never digitized' NES games are up for auction on eBay by thebelsnickle1991
Thanks for the shoutout!
americansherlock201 t1_iscvqxz wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Meta’s VR Headset Harvests Personal Data Right Off Your Face - Cameras inside the device that track eye and face movements can make an avatar’s expressions more realistic, but they raise new privacy questions. by speckz
Not just profit, but reach a large enough user base where the data has value. Super small user bases like those using this don’t have too much value. Millions of people using it and the data becomes much more valuable.
And for anyone wondering what this could be used for: they could track if you’re paying attention to something on screen such as in game ads to gather a value for those ads
iamchairs t1_iscvjbk wrote
Reply to comment by FPOWorld in Meta’s VR Headset Harvests Personal Data Right Off Your Face - Cameras inside the device that track eye and face movements can make an avatar’s expressions more realistic, but they raise new privacy questions. by speckz
Yeah pretty good. So as a response to that, Meta changed a lot of policies internally, and created a strong culture around privacy/security, has active 3rd party oversight, and strict guidelines from the FTC on how it can interact with 3rd parties on user data.
iamchairs t1_iscuvss wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Meta’s VR Headset Harvests Personal Data Right Off Your Face - Cameras inside the device that track eye and face movements can make an avatar’s expressions more realistic, but they raise new privacy questions. by speckz
Pretty lazy response. But not surprising based on what I've seen so far.
When you focus all of your attention on Facebook like it's the final boss then you fail to address the systemic problems all of these platforms have.
[deleted] t1_iscusnt wrote
Reply to comment by imdyingfasterthanyou in NVIDIA cancels GeForce RTX 4080 12GB - VideoCardz.com by MorgrainX
[removed]
FPOWorld t1_iscuq1v wrote
Reply to comment by iamchairs in Meta’s VR Headset Harvests Personal Data Right Off Your Face - Cameras inside the device that track eye and face movements can make an avatar’s expressions more realistic, but they raise new privacy questions. by speckz
CA jacked a bunch of data illegally, Facebook knew for years and didn’t disclose what happened until after that data was used to jack the election for Trump.
Edit: if you can call it a disclosure after it only came out via whistleblower complaint
iamchairs t1_isctw68 wrote
Reply to comment by FPOWorld in Meta’s VR Headset Harvests Personal Data Right Off Your Face - Cameras inside the device that track eye and face movements can make an avatar’s expressions more realistic, but they raise new privacy questions. by speckz
Good, and so am I. You could sum this up in a couple sentences then. But instead you are deflecting?
FPOWorld t1_isctjiy wrote
Reply to comment by iamchairs in Meta’s VR Headset Harvests Personal Data Right Off Your Face - Cameras inside the device that track eye and face movements can make an avatar’s expressions more realistic, but they raise new privacy questions. by speckz
Yes. I’m a computer engineer.
iamchairs t1_isct193 wrote
Reply to comment by FPOWorld in Meta’s VR Headset Harvests Personal Data Right Off Your Face - Cameras inside the device that track eye and face movements can make an avatar’s expressions more realistic, but they raise new privacy questions. by speckz
In what way does it not make sense? Tell me how the CA scandal worked. Do you know?
iamchairs t1_iscsw4j wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Meta’s VR Headset Harvests Personal Data Right Off Your Face - Cameras inside the device that track eye and face movements can make an avatar’s expressions more realistic, but they raise new privacy questions. by speckz
You can believe whatever you want. What you've written is pretty popular. But you have no idea how Meta works internally
TheLurkingMenace t1_iscsr99 wrote
Reply to comment by ChrisFromIT in NVIDIA cancels GeForce RTX 4080 12GB - VideoCardz.com by MorgrainX
The PSU required to drive the 4090 is already ridiculous. The 5000 series cards are going to need their own PSUs.
FPOWorld t1_iscsj1l wrote
Reply to comment by iamchairs in Meta’s VR Headset Harvests Personal Data Right Off Your Face - Cameras inside the device that track eye and face movements can make an avatar’s expressions more realistic, but they raise new privacy questions. by speckz
You’ll be waiting a long time because that sentence makes little sense.
FPOWorld t1_iscywk2 wrote
Reply to comment by iamchairs in Meta’s VR Headset Harvests Personal Data Right Off Your Face - Cameras inside the device that track eye and face movements can make an avatar’s expressions more realistic, but they raise new privacy questions. by speckz
NOW we can trust them? This is after they secretly ran psychological experiments on users without their consent (among many other scandals). They didn’t even suspend CA from using Facebook until after the whistleblower. They knew CA broke the law and covered it up for years. They didn’t follow their own policies, were an accessory to one of the greatest crimes of my lifetime, did nothing to stop what CA did with the data, and now we can trust they’re going to start following the rules?
The rot is at the top. There’s no fixing that as long as Zuck the conqueror is running the show. I won’t give meta a goddamn dollar or a click.