Recent comments in /f/gadgets
my_nameborat t1_istnoev wrote
Reply to comment by nexus1011 in Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
That’s why I bought cheap “AirPods” from an off brand site. Not as good as real ones but they work just fine and if I lose them I’m out $25 instead of $100 or now $200
twerkallknight t1_istn3cd wrote
Reply to comment by Bafw in Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
I work for one of the largest import brand in the US. We still have freight surcharges on all goods because of how expensive containers are for us. Your source literally shows how expensive costs got. The person I was responding to said there had been no cogs increases.
Slammedtgs t1_istm9tn wrote
Reply to Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
BOM cost on this thing is probably close to $35 bucks. It’s 1) a price increase for the sake of increasing price or 2) they don’t have supply so are raising the price because they can.
EmperorWasTaken t1_istlta3 wrote
Normal for fitbit, scumbag company. I had a watch, my gf had one, mom & dad had one each and all 4 of them stopped working right after warranty ended
EliselD t1_istktbs wrote
Reply to Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
Greed does that pretty well
Emergency-Wave-5335 t1_istkob5 wrote
Reply to comment by Fritzschmied in Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
When governments manufacture money out of thin air, inflation is inevitable. That money has to come from somewhere.
If you were paying attention, during 2020-2021 governments said inflation wasn't going to be an issue.
In 2022, we were told that this wasn't inflation, it was just a temporary issue. Then we were told it definitely wasn't inflation, it was just issues with the supply chain. While still maintaining that this is all temporary and prices will come back down.
Now, finally, they respond by hiking interest three times in a row, as priced continue to rise.
nothing to see here. blame the wealthy and the corporations!
This is your governments fault. Wherever you are. The only solution is putting politicians on poles.
sachin1118 t1_istjhns wrote
Reply to comment by Unhappy_Knowledge271 in Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
AirPods Pro first gen is still a great pickup, you can probably find them for ~$150
BlueGuyBuff t1_istj7nw wrote
Reply to Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
So they plan on absolutely nobody buying these except the segment of buyers who will pay more for flashy but underperforming hardware, just like their phone. There are so many earbuds significantly better than these for the same price or cheaper. Just like how there are better performing phones at their phone's price point.
deathfromababe t1_isti8xs wrote
Reply to LG Smart Monitor 32SQ780S is unleashed on the US market to take the 4K Samsung M8 on. by RenegadeUK
Out of stock now, who knows if it ever actually was being sold or just listed on Amazon as a future product.
Eshuon t1_istht5z wrote
Reply to comment by GuySlammer in Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
What are these "good ones" you are referring to? Apple usb c dongle is considered great for most use cases
GuySlammer t1_istgqfh wrote
Reply to comment by green9206 in Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
Fuck dongles though which you’re stuck having to use with almost any phone these days. I’ve bought cheap ones in a pack and neither lasted more than two days, not to mention the awful sound quality. And the “good” ones barely last more than six months if you’re lucky. If headphone jacks weren’t a thing of the past I’d tend to agree with you.
[deleted] t1_istdu24 wrote
Reply to comment by noxx1234567 in Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
[deleted]
AutoModerator t1_istdodf wrote
Reply to LG Smart Monitor 32SQ780S is unleashed on the US market to take the 4K Samsung M8 on. by RenegadeUK
We have multiple giveaways running!
Phone 14 Pro & Ugreen Nexode 140W chargers Giveaway!
WOWCube® Entertainment System!
reMarkable 2 next generation electronic paper tablet giveaway!
Hohem Go AI-powered Tracking Smartphone Holder Giveaway!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Suedie t1_istdg8a wrote
Reply to comment by zdfld in Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
They're on sale very often though. It's a sale tactic where they put it at a higher msrp so they can claim to have very deep discounts and entice you to buy them on a "limited time" offer.
So yea sure on paper the price difference is $50 but in practical reality from a consumers perspective the earfuns will end up being around less than half of the new nothing price.
Mister_Brevity t1_istba45 wrote
Reply to comment by Cheap_Amphibian309 in Fitbit customers report the latest update bricks their Versa 2 devices by iWearSkinyTies
A lot of companies just flag a device as stolen in the system (with a police report) but take no action, but the record is there if the police submit a data request.
As far as trying to scrape money from a used sale, that sounds like extra work for almost no money.
noxx1234567 t1_ist9rqe wrote
Reply to comment by Unhappy_Knowledge271 in Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
Airpods 2nd gen is around 110-120 much better value
Unhappy_Knowledge271 t1_ist99cm wrote
Reply to comment by noxx1234567 in Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
Could you recommend a few?
VikKarabin t1_ist8cqb wrote
Reply to Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
That's because I did not know they existed, even though I was on the market recently. They hit the only headline they could make.
morganj955 t1_ist86m9 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
Inflation is not a cause of price increases. It is just the symptom of price increases.
heckdditor t1_ist80wu wrote
Reply to Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
Nothing to comment
CambriaKilgannonn t1_ist7b0x wrote
Reply to comment by LilMoWithTheGimpyLeg in Fitbit customers report the latest update bricks their Versa 2 devices by iWearSkinyTies
I got mine pre-google and it's been going for years and years now
PussyStapler t1_ist6x7x wrote
Reply to comment by Fritzschmied in Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
I see inflation and increase of costs of components/materials commonly mentioned as causes for increased prices.
Most companies don't base price on what it costs. They base price on what the market will bear. If it costs them $80 to make headphones that sell for $100, and manufacturing costs went up, so it now costs them $90 to make headphones, they will still sell at $100, because that price was presumably optimized for demand and their marginal costs. They just make less money. If they increase price to $110, then they will sell fewer headphones, which could decrease revenue.
If price went up purely due to inflation, then the price would have gone up comparable to inflation, and people probably wouldn't care that much.
They are increasing the price because they have discovered that they will make more revenue at $150 than $100. So if they sell 150 headphones at $100, and 120 headphones at $150, they will make more money at $150. They may also find it's cheaper to make fewer headphones.
zdfld t1_ist6ibw wrote
Reply to comment by Suedie in Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
That's a sale price, if we're talking about sale prices the AKG N400NC for $50 was still the best deal in Bluetooth audio.
At the Earfun's regular price they're around $89-99. I haven't listened to either so I can't talk to differences in audio, ANC, or build quality. I do know a lot of reviews for nothing praised the build quality at $99.
chuckvsthelife t1_ist69zl wrote
Reply to comment by Buddhadevine in Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
To be fair to the wireless ANC earbud vs the headphone. Making it small is expensive even if it doesn’t sound as good.
Personally used to be a pretty hardcore only over ear headphone guy…. Then I got glasses.
NotAPreppie t1_istoel7 wrote
Reply to Nothing hikes price of Ear 1 earbuds by 50 percent - The $99 earbuds will soon cost $149 by speckz
So, they looked around and saw how everybody else was increasing profits and decided to follow along?