Recent comments in /f/gadgets
SharkyIzrod t1_j45kp9r wrote
Reply to comment by MercatorLondon in The Fairphone 2 will hit end-of-life after 7 years of updates by ennuinerdog
Leave it to r/gadgets to make literally any comment section a pro-Apple one.
SharkyIzrod t1_j45kjwr wrote
Reply to comment by Timequake-Droid in RIP Surface Duo—Microsoft reportedly gives up on the weird form factor - But Microsoft is still "all-in" with Android, plans a Galaxy Fold-style device. by speckz
>Microsoft has the duo, the zune, surface pro x, the neo, basically every arm-based mobile product I've ever made has been abandoned, The windows phone.... The surface book appears to be dead. Continuum..
This is a dishonest way to put it for the bolded products, though.
- The Duo, as the article mentions, will simply not continue with two separate screens and instead will have one foldable screen. That's like saying they "abandoned" the Xbox because they released a successor product. They are iterating and changing the product, and we'll see if the name sticks or not.
- The Surface Pro X was just an ARM-based Surface Pro with an SQ 1 or SQ 2 chip, as it was refreshed in late 2020. It was not abandoned because the last ARM-based Surface Pro to come out came out two months ago, it's just in the same body as the x86 Surface Pro products now. You can get a Surface Pro 9 with the SQ3. The 9 simply merged the X and the regular x86 lines.
- The Neo never came out (and I'm guessing it won't).
- The Surface Book was superseded by the Surface Laptop Studio, which means that, similarly to the Pro X, the concept/product category changed/evolved with the successor, not that it was abandoned.
hopsgrapesgrains t1_j45kf24 wrote
Reply to comment by BezniaAtWork in Intel breaks the 6GHz barrier with $699 Core i9-13900KS processor by Avieshek
58 is a normal temp to have heat set at. Hah
purpletooth12 t1_j45jwj2 wrote
Why oh why did they remove the earphone jack?!
trebuch3t t1_j45juaj wrote
Reply to comment by kkeiper1103 in Intel breaks the 6GHz barrier with $699 Core i9-13900KS processor by Avieshek
But imagine going from a vehicle that tops out at 1mph to a vehicle at 30mph, and then after the same period of time getting to a vehicle that tops at 60mph. Despite linear progress, 1mph max speed to 30mph is clearly much more impressive
Sterling-Arch3r t1_j45jaml wrote
i'd love a percentage of how many fairphone 2's are still actively being used
PineappleLemur t1_j45in06 wrote
Reply to comment by OozeNAahz in 3D printing reaches new heights with two-story home by speckz
They're not affordable for other reasons.. construction materials price rise is a small part of it.
Demend is through the roof the building takes time.. people are willing to pay a lot more than it's "worth" and then there's corporations that will buy for renting and they do massive buys.
PineappleLemur t1_j45ii6m wrote
Reply to comment by GodzlIIa in 3D printing reaches new heights with two-story home by speckz
Not more than any prefeb...
[deleted] t1_j45ih07 wrote
[removed]
tharnadar t1_j45if2e wrote
fancy wooden supports
Forgot_Password_Dude t1_j45hhoh wrote
are there even games that are multiplayer?
moneymanram t1_j45h82a wrote
Reply to comment by TasweII in The Fairphone 2 will hit end-of-life after 7 years of updates by ennuinerdog
More than fair considering apple is 6 years I believe
OldBoyZee t1_j45fag2 wrote
Reply to comment by Wuyley in Intel breaks the 6GHz barrier with $699 Core i9-13900KS processor by Avieshek
They changed the naming convention a while ago, due to more stable release launch window and a specific project name. For ex. Skylake i3, vs coffee lake i3. They are different generations, but anyone can easily know its an i3. While the pentium was long running with many, many variations, if i recall, and they used to figure that out with ghz since it was a one and done core processor or dual core, etc.
Actually, amd had the same thing. They would just call their processors, zhambezi, or some weird name no one understood, but it was always ghz based due to oc and how many cores, even when the core processing sucked.
Personally, ghz matter little now, specially since most applications already use multiple cores and threads. Singular core stuff is more ghz related, and honestly, its good we made it past that stuff.
Zenith251 t1_j45f0r0 wrote
Reply to comment by TunaOnWytNoCrust in Intel breaks the 6GHz barrier with $699 Core i9-13900KS processor by Avieshek
12th Gen and Zen3 were big jumps. 13th and Zen4... Ok. Certain tasks that require massive memory bandwidth benefit, but the power consumption of these new chips... Oof.
[deleted] t1_j45ekcj wrote
Reply to comment by LukeLC in Intel breaks the 6GHz barrier with $699 Core i9-13900KS processor by Avieshek
[removed]
Zenith251 t1_j45ejx6 wrote
Remember when Intel said their Netburst architecture would scale up to 10GHz? https://www.anandtech.com/show/680/6
Still waiting for that, Santa Clara.
Zenith251 t1_j45e2z4 wrote
Reply to comment by namesarenotus in Intel breaks the 6GHz barrier with $699 Core i9-13900KS processor by Avieshek
250w? No, my friend. 295w for the 13900K. The 7950x eats up about 250w.
[deleted] t1_j45ck7n wrote
Reply to comment by Forgotten_Planet in 3D printing reaches new heights with two-story home by speckz
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j45chya wrote
Reply to comment by AlienPrimate in 3D printing reaches new heights with two-story home by speckz
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j45c8lo wrote
Reply to comment by jlws22 in 3D printing reaches new heights with two-story home by speckz
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j45bzdy wrote
Reply to comment by LoudTsu in 3D printing reaches new heights with two-story home by speckz
[deleted]
MercatorLondon t1_j45blmq wrote
That sounds like my iPad Pro. I bought it in 2015 and I have full software updates 8 years later running their latest iOS. I believe it will also run next year update. I also had a battery replaced last year in Apple Store. I looked around the 3rd party repair shops but the cost was similar. So far this was the best supported IT product I had up to date. We need more companies doing this.
Lechowski t1_j45bjvo wrote
Isn't there a physical limit to the frequency of the processor based on the size of the die? I mean, at some point the transistor in one edge of the die will take more time to update it's state than the clock in clocking'
Avieshek OP t1_j45bjcb wrote
Reply to comment by SUPRVLLAN in Apple to Make Custom Displays In-House, Starting With MicroLED for Apple Watch Ultra in 2024 by Avieshek
I suppose he’s saying it as in long term? Remember, OLED started with Watch too.
james2432 t1_j45lmam wrote
Reply to comment by namesarenotus in Intel breaks the 6GHz barrier with $699 Core i9-13900KS processor by Avieshek
only missing 1250w to pull as much as a space heater/ hair dryer