Recent comments in /f/gadgets
Killjoy911 t1_j60242m wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
Ya it’s like our RND department is technologically stunted.
Stillwater215 t1_j6023ex wrote
Reply to HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
I can get why soldiers currently in the field who are being transitioned to it hate it, but I’d be curious if new soldiers who would be trained on this equipment from the start would see any improvement in effectivity compared to soldiers who were trained without it.
Saeryf t1_j5zz6aj wrote
Reply to comment by S0M3D1CK in HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
This, getting instant and accurate information for your shot at a glance would be outstanding.
DarthBuzzard t1_j5zyoe3 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
Google Glass is completely unrelated technology to AR. That was a 2D HUD - the equivalent of a smartwatch for your face.
There are very few attempts so far that get close to a pair of sunglasses with AR, and those that do have severe limitations. Snap's AR spectacles only has a 30 minute battery life, Vuzix Shield is only monochrome, and Nreal Light is tethered. All of these have a tiny field of view, and the only known way to achieve a large field of view with AR thus far is a much larger/bulkier device.
Seriously, if you think this is bulky, look at what a very wide FoV AR device looks like: https://www.roadtovr.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/leap-motion-projet-northstar-3.jpg
[deleted] t1_j5zya0q wrote
VincentNacon t1_j5zv1s9 wrote
Reply to An ALS patient set a record for communicating via a brain implant: 62 words per minute by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
That's roughly about one word per second... that's pretty good! :D
[deleted] t1_j5zui4v wrote
Reply to comment by robplumm in HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
[deleted]
rickert1337 t1_j5zu5f3 wrote
Reply to HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
Wearing that is like saying that piece of headgear has more power than your brain.. fukin useless... only thing u need are ur eyes and night goggles
EnergySteal-er t1_j5ztum0 wrote
Reply to comment by ChronWeasely in HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
The AR googles include this technology https://youtu.be/2v0YrtkwUDQ
bucketsofpoo t1_j5ztdgu wrote
Reply to comment by xenon54xenon54 in HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
The lead makes soldiers angrier so it is a win.
Waggles_T_Snugdragon t1_j5zs7bm wrote
Reply to HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
I've played Ghost Recon, it's annoying how long all that shit takes to pop up, it's like trying to text in the middle of a firefight
In0nsistentGentleman t1_j5zs0p3 wrote
Reply to HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
Wouldn't the results of this be a bit skewed though? I mean, putting them in the 1.0 Version of a specific technology and asking them to do something and then comparing it to the years of training done another way doesn't seem like a very good test. It sounds like the soldiers would need to be brought up and trained using this kind of equipment for months and months to actually determine the viability of it. As a gamer, just think of a new UI when a familiar game releases a new title. It's a bit jarring and tough to get used to until you've immersed yourself in it over the course of months. Take that several levels forward and I can understand why doing it "the old way" would look superior.
In the article, they do go into this a bit but it seems the preference for the old equipment is likely rooted in the unfamiliarity of the new equipment, but also that the 1.0 equipment just isnt...where it needs to be. Which I suppose makes sense.
Though, I think that we should keep investing in the technology because eventually it will be where it needs to be and be a benefit.
xenon54xenon54 t1_j5zrvtb wrote
Reply to comment by TheRealDoomsong in HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
Ah yes, lead, a metal well-known for its safety when inside people's brains.
betafishmusic t1_j5zrq6h wrote
Reply to HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
I can feel my face pulling forward just looking at this image.
Nobel6skull t1_j5zp0ce wrote
Reply to HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
In shocking news, brand new technology will take time to work out.
Killjoy911 t1_j5zotvm wrote
Reply to comment by braiinfried in HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
Yup….. exactly, or fail from soldiers using it once and throwing it in the equipment locker and not using it enough to be proficient.
Killjoy911 t1_j5zol0c wrote
Reply to comment by sesor33 in HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
See the problem for me is not the hud system. I agree with you, a hud with locations and directions and all that would be great. It’s the hardware behind it. Shit it probably uses those block singars batteries (2590’s), you feel me. Charging this shit and getting it to glasses that are as thin as m frames, with an easy to use interface…. Not going to happen. People have been watching and playing too many video games.. last deployments I had it was always the simplest shit that worked the best… not this fancy bullshit.
Sullixio t1_j5zoer5 wrote
Upsetcupofoj1230 t1_j5zo942 wrote
Reply to comment by Sullixio in HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
I don’t think you know what that word means
DanceSensitive t1_j5zo72b wrote
Reply to HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
That design is cheap ass garbage. It needs to be smaller than Glass to be efficient.
Upsetcupofoj1230 t1_j5zo5yv wrote
Reply to comment by KittenKoder in HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
So we should never ever evolve ever?
[deleted] t1_j5zmvoc wrote
ChronWeasely t1_j5zmn0c wrote
Reply to comment by Beepboopbob1 in HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
Who didn't see Iron Man and think, "Damn, wish I just had a HUD for life sometimes."
Like you are a block away from your destination, but you are second-guessing the location and don't want to pull out your phone and open up the map. Then you walk another block to discover you went the wrong way about 5 blocks back and have 10 to walk still because you were actually thinking of that other place.
Not based on real life obviously.
braiinfried t1_j5zld5j wrote
Reply to comment by Killjoy911 in HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
Don’t forget the rule that tech will always fail when you need it most. The last thing you want is this shit going out mid firefight
Killjoy911 t1_j6033bw wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in HoloLens AR actually makes soldiers less lethal, soldiers hate it | Report comes after Microsoft lays off various VR/AR employees by BlueLightStruct
We’ll see my theory is…… that whoever develops this shit plays to much call of duty. Media puts out this image of a futuristic soldier with jet packs and 3d hologlasses… and Fuckin millennium falcons (joking of course) and the engineers that design this have never been in a conflict. The closest they get is watching fury with the lights off and surround sound. They don’t realize that for most cases.. the less shit you can carry the better, especially when you’re on foot. Your maneuverability increases, your SA (situational awareness) increases and you are able to operate at an op tempo that’s higher for a longer period of time. Then on top of that, they try and get it to integrate with gear that’s already fielded.. old battery technology.. etc to save money… I could go on and on…