Recent comments in /f/gadgets

pfc9769 t1_j6nfz8y wrote

I had accidental lock screen 921 call once. I panicked and hung up. They immediately called me back and I explained what happened. The dispatcher then asked If I was under distress and answering truthfully. It threw me off and there was a long dramatic pause. She asked me if I’m sure and I repeated yes and the dispatcher sent out a cop to check up anyway. I felt bad for wasting their time, but it was good of the dispatcher to even think to ask that.

3

freehombre t1_j6ncz64 wrote

I like the idea in theory but it makes that call really quick. This winter, while skiing, I have had this almost make the call to 911 three times. I would wipeout and then while getting shit back together I phone would start saying; “you have 10 seconds to respond or I will call 911.” The issue is I have my phone under so many layers with gloves on, etc. I can see this happening

4

FeralCJ7 t1_j6n6i8g wrote

Eh, I was a cop for over a decade. The number of pocket dial 911 calls we got is crazy. Unbelievable.

But, it's not really costing money imo. I mean, the dispatchers are paid no matter what, so are the police. I was already out driving around anyway, so if I'm driving here or there it doesn't matter, it's costing tax dollars.

And, every department I worked at a 911 unknown, or 911 hangup, was always a lower priority than a known issue. So if we got dispatched to an alarm or a crash we always for those first then the unknown calls. So it didn't really take away from emergency responses elsewhere.

3

Drachefly t1_j6n3mw6 wrote

Seems like a good way to handle this would be to only trigger if it goes from violent motion to nearly totally still.

If you're still moving, figure that you're fine. That would get rid of roller coasters, as after all that violent motion, you get up and walk way from it. Similarly with skiing. You reach the bottom and glide to a halt, then begin walking around.

3

bleucheeez t1_j6n2z93 wrote

Partly true. But the criticism so far is fair and all factual.

Apple seemingly didn't collect sufficient test data for these very common scenarios. The rollout was premature. And as typical for Apple, they didn't ask for anyone else's buy-in before including the feature. This news article indicates multiple counties with 15-20 false calls a day due to iPhone crash detection, and zero actual emergencies. Getting a call from emergency services while I'm bombing a run or slaying pow will definitely kill my fun. Missing that call costs precious emergency resources for the local responders.

There should be geographic blackout areas. Or allow local emergency services to ask Apple to disable crash detection in an area. Or send push notification asking the user whether they would like to disable.

I had an iPhone SE (2nd gen) for a while. Even on that thing, several times when the phone would lag or freeze, I ended up calling emergency services. They made a poor design choice on their GUI for that too.

1

CoBullet t1_j6mqqsu wrote

No, a 99.44% valid calls rate to the Fire Department of Kita-Alps via any means.

The article isn't even saying 134 of these calls are from the iPhone, just that they received 134 false calls and that the iPhone makes up "most" of them.

This article is clickbait junk without any actual details about the crash detection failing.

13