Recent comments in /f/gadgets
mysteryliner t1_j6pdcfj wrote
Reply to Anker Admits Eufy Cameras Did Not Offer End-to-End Encryption as Promised, Pledges to Do Better by TheMacMan
End to end encryption you say?
From which ends, if everything remains local. 😏
Flextt t1_j6pcpqt wrote
Reply to comment by Timstro59 in Mass-market military drones have changed the way wars are fought by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
I mean, maybe? Some day? Using your industrial capabilities to mass manufacture robotic combat drones however is much more likely to happen soon. Democracies don't unlikely to fight wars and when they do, public support can be tenuous. Drones potentially eliminate most of the human cost of warfare for the side deploying them.
TheMacMan OP t1_j6pcah9 wrote
Reply to Anker Admits Eufy Cameras Did Not Offer End-to-End Encryption as Promised, Pledges to Do Better by TheMacMan
"Trust us this 3rd time around..."
bleucheeez t1_j6p8t74 wrote
Reply to comment by rakehellion in iPhone crash detection feature makes 100 false calls by speckz
I can't foresee how the pros outweigh the cons for auto-dial high speed crash detection devices inside of a known theme park or in a ski resort inbounds. Please enlighten me.
ADhomin_em t1_j6p54u6 wrote
Reply to comment by REMEMBER__MY__NAME in iPhone crash detection feature makes 100 false calls by speckz
"Do you ever think it's crazy that you have a son?" Is this exchange AI generated?
ConciselyVerbose t1_j6p3jlu wrote
Reply to comment by Sp3llbind3r in iPhone crash detection feature makes 100 false calls by speckz
Let’s say, hypothetically, that it was as bad as 50% false calls, 50% calls that wouldn’t have been made, and that every false call is missing a real call. That’s break even. That means 1 person loses access to emergency services and 1 person gains.
Any better than that and you’re helping more people than you hurt. Obviously the ideal is perfection, and not having any false calls, especially ones that take resources from real people. But it doesn’t take amazing accuracy to improve the net outcome.
If you get data that they’re more likely to be incorrect than a normal call, you can change your prioritization to prioritize a human speaking. Apple can continue to improve their accuracy to minimize false positives. But those improvements are from a situation that’s already better than it not existing.
[deleted] t1_j6p0n7z wrote
Reply to comment by pseudopad in iPhone crash detection feature makes 100 false calls by speckz
[deleted]
Confident-alien-7291 t1_j6ox4d8 wrote
I prefer a 100 mistaken calls then 1 where the feature didn’t work, im not an Apple fanboy but I absolutely appreciate this feature and I’m sure if I ever get into an accident I’ll be forever thankful that it worked
rakehellion t1_j6orspe wrote
Reply to comment by EsotericAbstractIdea in iPhone crash detection feature makes 100 false calls by speckz
The auto-dialing is literally the whole point.
EsotericAbstractIdea t1_j6oq60b wrote
Reply to comment by rakehellion in iPhone crash detection feature makes 100 false calls by speckz
The auto-dialing part has to go.
EsotericAbstractIdea t1_j6opywx wrote
Reply to comment by PivotalPosture in iPhone crash detection feature makes 100 false calls by speckz
I'd be ok with it if it didn't also text me a lie when it did a false call for my mom.
"CRASH DETECTED SOS
Your Mom called emergency services from this approximate location after iPhone detected a crash."
​
No... the iPhone called 911 on its own after it fell on the ground. I sped across town because of that.
PerpetualFarter t1_j6om9bk wrote
Reply to comment by circlehead28 in iPhone crash detection feature makes 100 false calls by speckz
That’s bullshit.
Successful-Pen-9301 t1_j6oksuk wrote
Bumps into something WEEEEE! WOOO! 🤣
garry4321 t1_j6oeyqh wrote
Reply to comment by YnotBbrave in iPhone crash detection feature makes 100 false calls by speckz
Id rather the police go out than someone be dead and they didnt go to cut "cost".
mynaneisjustguy t1_j6odu7m wrote
Reply to comment by DataSquid2 in Mass-market military drones have changed the way wars are fought by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
Drone swarms are already a thing I believe. Just not being deployed yet.
alexwhittemore t1_j6o8409 wrote
Reply to comment by nwbeng in iPhone crash detection feature makes 100 false calls by speckz
Yeah I found out this past weekend that a fast hockey stop apparently looks like a crash.
gear_m9 t1_j6ns843 wrote
Reply to comment by NotOsama123 in Huge Sony Xperia 1 IV price cut gives credence to rumor that Xperia 1 V may match Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra price tag by ardi62
Well that's a much welcome development I didn't know about. Happy to be wrong in this case, especially with loading custom Roms after support ends.
NotOsama123 t1_j6nrn1b wrote
Reply to comment by gear_m9 in Huge Sony Xperia 1 IV price cut gives credence to rumor that Xperia 1 V may match Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra price tag by ardi62
Support has been upped to three os updates plus two years of security patches for new generations. Basically the lifespan of the hardware. Plus they make it easy to load your own OS if you want to after it stops receiving official support.
pipboyover9000 t1_j6nrgwf wrote
Reply to comment by REMEMBER__MY__NAME in iPhone crash detection feature makes 100 false calls by speckz
You seem like you have really cool takes on life, honestly
SupaDupaTron t1_j6nn06g wrote
Reply to comment by AlloverYerFace in iPhone crash detection feature makes 100 false calls by speckz
I agree, but I also kind of miss the thrill of the chase. And then opening up the baggy to see exactly what it is I just scored. It could be a gamble, but it was kind of fun.
ProbablyGayingOnYou t1_j6nl4wr wrote
This seems like one of those features where it's probably intentionally designed to err on the side of false positives rather than false negatives. Although as other commenters have noted, then you have to contend with the "boy who cried wolf" effect of those detections being ignored.
who_you_are t1_j6njvho wrote
Meanwhile, my Android phone power start spamming itself which also lock my screen no stop which make it impossible to cancel the call
SirSteeleC t1_j6nhqgw wrote
Reply to comment by inkseep1 in Mass-market military drones have changed the way wars are fought by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
That's one of the most terrifying videos I've ever seen. Genuinely made my skin crawl
PrincessElonMusk t1_j6nhkip wrote
Reply to comment by chriswaco in Mass-market military drones have changed the way wars are fought by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
The challenge with blanketing an area with enough EM to interfere with all possible drones 24x7 is that you risk degrading your own capabilities that require use of EM frequencies.
Insufferablelol t1_j6pgm0v wrote
Reply to Anker Admits Eufy Cameras Did Not Offer End-to-End Encryption as Promised, Pledges to Do Better by TheMacMan
Promises to try and not get caught this time they mean