Recent comments in /f/gadgets
spaceraingame t1_itiwd38 wrote
Reply to Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
And it’ll only cost at least $25,000!
BostonDrivingIsWorse t1_itivd17 wrote
AutoModerator t1_itisqu4 wrote
Reply to Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
We have multiple giveaways running!
Razer Thunderbolt 4 Dock Chroma! - Intel Thunderbolt 4.
Phone 14 Pro & Ugreen Nexode 140W chargers Giveaway!
WOWCube® Entertainment System!
Hohem Go AI-powered Tracking Smartphone Holder Giveaway!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Miss_Speller t1_itiqwig wrote
Reply to comment by Kor3nse in A New 3,200-Megapixel Camera Has Astronomers Salivating by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
It's a tradition as old as reddit itself! And with all the excitement about JWST it's easy to forget that ground-based telescopes are still a thing.
systemfrown t1_itim55m wrote
Do they make a DLSR adapter?
Kor3nse t1_ities5t wrote
Reply to comment by Miss_Speller in A New 3,200-Megapixel Camera Has Astronomers Salivating by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
Lol I absolutely didnt read the article so that makes sense
tomcatkb t1_ithuoxh wrote
Reply to comment by notmichaelmoore in A New 3,200-Megapixel Camera Has Astronomers Salivating by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
Come on…it’s 2022…600..?
uncriticalthinking t1_ith9gtd wrote
Reply to comment by Youtube-Gerger in A New 3,200-Megapixel Camera Has Astronomers Salivating by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
Slammed headline = disagreement
[deleted] t1_ith3j9q wrote
Reply to comment by Youtube-Gerger in A New 3,200-Megapixel Camera Has Astronomers Salivating by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
[removed]
notmichaelmoore t1_ith2it1 wrote
What’s the native print resolution at 300 dpi?
orangutanDOTorg t1_itgv2s4 wrote
Reply to comment by Miss_Speller in A New 3,200-Megapixel Camera Has Astronomers Salivating by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
We just need a big flying mirror and core can still get their pictures
orangutanDOTorg t1_itguf7t wrote
Unfortunately I’m still several decades away from being allowed to rent ultraporn
Aspen140 t1_itgszld wrote
Now the aliens can send high quality n00dz instead of that pixelized shit we’ve been getting.
Aspen140 t1_itgsqqt wrote
Reply to comment by imafraidofmuricans in A New 3,200-Megapixel Camera Has Astronomers Salivating by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
Any hole is a goal r/dragrace
amateuR_memes t1_itgsp6m wrote
Reply to comment by esp211 in A New 3,200-Megapixel Camera Has Astronomers Salivating by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
IPhone 97 Pro Max
Aspen140 t1_itgsis7 wrote
Reply to comment by americansherlock201 in A New 3,200-Megapixel Camera Has Astronomers Salivating by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
Ghosts say what?
oh_botha t1_itgs78y wrote
Finally a camera capable of capturing your mom 🙏
eli7vh t1_itgpd4p wrote
Reply to comment by ibrown39 in A New 3,200-Megapixel Camera Has Astronomers Salivating by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
Thanks for sharing! Damn those composites must have taken forever
proxyproxyomega t1_itghhhn wrote
Reply to comment by cgoot27 in A New 3,200-Megapixel Camera Has Astronomers Salivating by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
you take more pictures
americansherlock201 t1_itgft1r wrote
Reply to comment by JLRSN in A New 3,200-Megapixel Camera Has Astronomers Salivating by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
Jigga who?
[deleted] t1_itgbh9f wrote
Reply to comment by typescriptDev99 in LG Smart Monitor 32SQ780S is unleashed on the US market to take the 4K Samsung M8 on. by RenegadeUK
[removed]
imafraidofmuricans t1_itg95r3 wrote
Reply to comment by Youtube-Gerger in A New 3,200-Megapixel Camera Has Astronomers Salivating by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
That they did not even care to do it with the DART probe shows they don't understand how self -parodying it has gotten.
"Probe SLAMS asteroid" is an open goal!
adaminc t1_itg8xdx wrote
I wonder what the pixel pitch is.
adaminc t1_itg8sjl wrote
Reply to comment by cgoot27 in A New 3,200-Megapixel Camera Has Astronomers Salivating by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
It really depends on what is going on in the image, and the exposure settings.
If you are exposing something with relatively low motion, or no motion, these days there really is no difference. But if there is moderate to high motion, than you will see errors start to pop up in the stitched image, especially if the things in motion are moving across stitch edges. If the camera has a built in super-resolution mode where it uses IBIS to shift the sensor, those errors can be even more pronounced and harder to fix in post. Then on top of that, if you need to do longer exposures because the scene is dark, that makes things like motion blurs even harder to deal with because they usually don't look good, or the blur might just suddenly stop, when crossing stitch edges.
So being able to take a single monolithic image will fix most of these issues from the get go.
deputytech t1_itiwxez wrote
Reply to Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
Man that thing would be perfect for my professional life of browsing Reddit all day.