>I don’t see anyone who genuinely works with computers using Apple anytime soon

?????

>22yo. So I don't know too much

!!!

So because insulin isn't aimed at the average person we can charge 20k for it?

Apple making something cost an obscene amount of money, with an obscene markup, for no reason other than pure greed is why we hate them

No, but it can probably run an emulated version since Crysis wasn't made for mac.

so $50k, right?

So you confirm that you your forever stuck with x86-PCs, because your sunk cost is so damn high.

Wood scraps, industrial Velcro. Sorted.

I’ll just wait for the iPhone 32 thanks

Not entirely. They became the most valuable company by having hardware and software that work well together

r/redditmoment

[removed]

apple fan boy here, recently switched to a 3080 ti w a 12600k because i couldn't afford apple's prices anymore. Gotta be honest, kinda sucks, not only the available OS are awful (Windows being the most used one, tried linux which is absolutely useless if you don't wanna waste hours setting it up and stuff). Not only talking about the countless bugs that continuously pop out, but specifically about the softwares that are just straight up hell for how they are optimized, i am a photoshop daily user and premiere as well. Compared to the Macs that friends let me use to work it's just a burning pile of trash, horrendous performance with what was considered pretty much the top of the range just couple months ago. If i could go back i'd def spend that extra thousand to actually have a working machine that WORKS. On the other hand, i do see where redditors are coming since pretty much all of you use a pc just to game, and gotta admit the experience on that side is amazing! Also given the fact that apple won't optimize their cpu and gpu better for already existing games and won't try to make some contracts to get more games on the platform.

[deleted]

it has been the design for the mac pro since the early 2000s surprising how you never seen one

it has been the design for the mac pro since the early 2000s so it wouldn't surprise me if it did

Yeah, this is exactly what I thought. The big pro of the Pro is the option to expand your Mac, I'm really curious how (or if) they are going to support PCI-E expansions. And if the huge amount of GPU cores will bring the same performance as a high end AMD GPU. Cause to me this sounds like a Mac Pro becoming less Pro.

Thanks

Out of curiousity what upgrades? CPU, GPU, RAM, STORAGE? I know nothing of them.

As someone else already explained it I'll just add that RAM is what is traditionally called 'memory' in a system with HDD and SSD being storage. Some companies started saying memory when they meant storage a while ago and I've hated it from the start for the reason you were confused. They are not the same at all.

[removed]

Mac pro has upgrades tho

But how many PCIe slots? That’s the decider and apparent weakness of Apple Silicon.

Don't take this too literally boy.

Zero upgrades, limited software, I never understood this apple religion. Users just think they're better than anyone else just because they have something more expensive while they're the fool ones trapped in continuous spending cycle.

As an owner of one of the previous Mac Pro’s from New. I just hope that the lower tier models will be fast enough for my needs without costing the same as a brand new car. The last specification practically cost 13 grand to get it to a comfortable spec which was nuts. Bought a trash can Mac Pro on release at a decent spec for under £3,000

[removed]