Recent comments in /f/gadgets
podaypodayson t1_itkwq4l wrote
Reply to comment by Nytonial in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
I can’t believe you’re actually this daft.
• People who buy insulin do so in order to not die
• People who buy Apple products do so because they feel like it
If you think Apple products are too expensive, simply don’t buy them, and their pricing structure has no effect on your life. It’s pretty cool how easy it is!
Nytonial t1_itkw4gc wrote
Reply to comment by podaypodayson in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
What does something not being life saving medication mean it's then absolutely ok to be bent over by a company charging a 200% markup?
Why be soo proud that you're making some apple shareholders ridiculously rich so you can have an underperforming fashion statement?
mangodelvxe t1_itkvp3i wrote
Reply to comment by TwitchFunnyguy77 in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
Wtf do yo you mean? Reddit is constantly sucking off Apple in every tech sub on here
podaypodayson t1_itkvd06 wrote
Reply to comment by Nytonial in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
Well this is the dumbest take I’ve seen in years. Let me know when a Mac Pro is a lifesaving medication.
withoutwarningfl t1_itkuvmc wrote
Reply to comment by PotatoSlayerChip in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
My college professor called it Darth Vader’s butt plug.
Nytonial t1_itkul08 wrote
Reply to comment by mocha-only in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
The issue is apple sets examples and pushes stupid design choices into the industry.
I complain because if apple fans stopped just accepting single usb ports, no expandable storage on iPhones and removal of basic features to charge more to users it wouldn't be so prevalent across the rest of the industry. I'm equally critical of Samsung and many pc manufacturers for example.
If people are valuing brushed aluminium and a high pixel count over actual computing ability AT AN EXTRA PREMIUM PRICE, yeah I'm going to ridicule it
Nytonial t1_itku879 wrote
Reply to comment by benanderson89 in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
"designed for specialised tasks" is that a fancy way of saying browsing Facebook? Since anything else would cook them down to 1ghz speeds.
While I agree m1 is a big change and actually incredible development, nothing about intel Mac's was workstation class without excessive gatekeeping mentality.
PhysicsMan12 t1_itkttwb wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
Maybe you should go watch some reviews benchmarking Apple silicon before you write this stuff. Apple silicon is absolutely incredible is many workloads. The performance per watt is out of this world (in many tasks) And the flat out performance (in many tasks) is just plain superb. Go watch some reviews/benchmarking videos.
yabaitanidehyousu t1_itktew4 wrote
Reply to comment by Saaihead in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
Non-pro here.
I think they would have to be daft to force customers to move away from (end support for) their existing GPU dependencies (and investments), but then again, Apple is more focused on partner solutions, and they are in a position to support all major software vendors to switching their Metal implementations to any Apple Silicon based implementation.
Apple aims to make a workstation for high-brand software workflows and that is what they will do.
However, I think they have a long way to go to make a compelling ecosystem for high-end development. It’s already very restrictive with only one (edit: non-Apple) choice (AMD), and making that completely closed to Apple’s fledgling ecosystem is not attractive to me as a potential investment.
tomistruth t1_itktd56 wrote
Reply to Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
In all seriousnes, this will be good to heat my apartment this winter.
PotatoSlayerChip t1_itksd55 wrote
Reply to comment by ObscureBen in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
True, completely forgot about the subwoofer
ObscureBen t1_itks9co wrote
Reply to comment by PotatoSlayerChip in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
This is trash can Mac Pro erasure
PotatoSlayerChip t1_itks8qx wrote
Reply to comment by MarcusAurelius68 in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
damn! How could i forget about the subwoofer
No-Protection8322 t1_itks692 wrote
Reply to comment by OGShrimpPatrol in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
Isn’t that what a ps4 is for?
MarcusAurelius68 t1_itkrzw4 wrote
Reply to comment by PotatoSlayerChip in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
Except for the 2013 trash can
synthsucht t1_itkrmy8 wrote
Reply to comment by jazir5 in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
He got the reaction he wanted. 👍
OGShrimpPatrol t1_itkr4hh wrote
Reply to Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
But it still won’t be able to run cyberpunk
benanderson89 t1_itkqkww wrote
Reply to comment by Nytonial in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
They've always been workstation grade hardware because they've been designed for specialised tasks with certifications from software vendors and optimised for a strict subset of tasks. The previous intel systems had dedicated hardware for video (EG the T2 chip in many models doubled as a transcode processor), ECC Graphics RAM and were highly optimised 2D Image and Audio processing. Current ARM systems are highly optimised for high memory throughput applications and multi-processing (and the genius NUMA implementation in the M1 Max Ultra is a legitimately innovative piece of technology; the interconnect between the two domains being as fast as local node memory is a stunning achievement).
The reason Apple sell so many systems to business is because they're a good buy for business and price and feature competitive with other *nix systems like the Dell Precision, Lenovo ThinkPad or HP Z. Not checked the pricing on the IBM Power systems recently but I imagine those are going to be astronomically priced by comparison.
mocha-only t1_itkqjbi wrote
Reply to comment by Nytonial in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
What a shit comparison—lifesaving drug for some vs. powerful computer. Gunna hit you with a wild thought: if you don’t like apple no one’s gunna make you buy it.
benanderson89 t1_itkpoi0 wrote
Reply to comment by resfan in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
No?
The MacBook Pro and MacPro are some of the more affordable workstation systems available. These aren't generic "gaming" PCs. A business after a high availability, certified, high stress and purpose designed computer aren't going to slam a 3080 in a Corsair case and call it a day; they're spending £50k on a MacPro for multimedia production or £100k on a Dell Precision for Engineering and simulation, because systems like this are designed to do very specific tasks reliably and consistently.
Nytonial t1_itkpaci wrote
Reply to comment by benanderson89 in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
Because they aren't workstation spec unless you mean "contain software you're trapped into" as a reason they are a workstation
They are average hardware with shocking thermals, untill m1, which isn't compatible with enough yet
benanderson89 t1_itkp999 wrote
Reply to comment by sparda4glol in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
You bought a laptop thinking it would out perform a full sized desktop?
benanderson89 t1_itkp4j2 wrote
Reply to comment by Nytonial in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
The MacPro and MacBook Pros in the workstation market are some of the more affordable options
contactlite t1_itkoxm7 wrote
Reply to comment by dotmax in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
If only we could download the iPad app on MacOS. The any browser version is a pig.
mBertin t1_itkyhze wrote
Reply to comment by PaulR79 in Apple testing Apple Silicon Mac Pro with 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, 192GB of memory by prehistoric_knight
All of those. The current Mac Pro has like 7 PCIE slots and supports up to 1,5 tb ram.