>I don’t think

You sure don't bub

I don’t think PitViper and looking good should go together in the same sentence. But there is an upside. It doesn’t matter what I think. It matters what style design will sell. Also, I can’t wear pitvipers at work.

Article says it’s all in green but the video of it in action at the bottom shows full color. No talk about battery life either

Can we just get a collab with pitviper so giant frames and lenses might actually look GOOD for once on these?

I would say “not Too goofy but still a little weird lookin”

Surely it’s much better than phone backs held with tough glue and non standard screws but « in less than 5 minutes » makes me laugh a bit.

The last phone I owned with a removable battery was a Galaxy Nexus and I could swap the battery in less than 10 seconds using only my fingernail.

How about you read the article before getting mad and leaving a completely irrelevant comment ?

I would actually consider wearing those. I’d need them to order more than message notifications though.

Omg thank you! Can you also tell me whats in that lead box Lex?

The way this phone is put together isn’t inherently different or better than Samsungs budget phones. They look very similar in repairability except maybe the pull off backs like the older phones have. So really it’s just a 5 year old chassis design they are returning to and now advertising it as so,etching better.

Here’s where I prove you wrong:

/ (⊚)(⊚)〵 ლ(◉◡◉ლ)

They still look weird

[removed]

Best OP can do is 4.3 inches

[deleted]

It's split between Vietnam and India by the looks of it, they also make some very high end models in Korea itself.

Nope, nothing wrong with it and won't be misused. (Remembers the early Sony cameras with infrared that could see through clothes) Nope, nothing wrong here, move along.

Ohh, suuuure. That’s why Macs with MDM constantly get hacked, and nobody uses them anymore.

Edit: No, what Apple’s MDM has instead is a button to take all selected machines out of it. It’s the organizations using it that don’t want to use it. Stop pretending this is Apple’s fault.

The back door already exist.

Apple can already remove the lock, they just don't do it for enterprise machines

This isn't even an instance where information security is a concern, the drives are already wiped. This is to complete the factory reset and establish a new user.

And to get ahead of your "but what if its a stolen laptop" Apple already confirms the machine hasn't been stolen before unlocking them for non enterprise machines.

No boobs? 🤨

Oh, sure, Apple could build in a backdoor into their MDM. Surely nobody but honest buyers could ever use that. Or the FBI.

I will save you a click: this is based on RFID technology, so there are no boobs involved, .

[removed]

Apple will remove activation lock on a second hand machine with a proof of purchase, but they will explicitly refuse to do it if the computer uses Apple MDM (a feature only used by enterprise) even if you can demonstrate you lawfully received the machines from the company.

Hell, I'm sure these refurbishers would even be willing to pay $20 a machine to get it done. This isn't about protecting users, it's about controlling the volume of second hand MacBooks in the market

Why should Apple provide an easy way to unlock stolen machines?

But hey, organized crime has got to live too, right?