Recent comments in /f/gadgets
DarthBuzzard OP t1_jbxsesv wrote
Reply to comment by CryonautX in Tim Cook bets on Apple’s mixed-reality headset to secure his legacy by DarthBuzzard
The tech can't progress if they don't push for it. How else do you think technology develops to be acceptable for the masses?
Time solves very little. It's only really active investment and product iterations that are responsible for mass market viable technology advances.
DarthBuzzard OP t1_jbxs6n0 wrote
Reply to comment by ledow in Tim Cook bets on Apple’s mixed-reality headset to secure his legacy by DarthBuzzard
> We had sci-fi desires of smartphones for decades, we just didn't call them that
Yet most people didn't want a cellphone until the late 1990s. Turns out that humans universally reject all hardware shifts, with a chance of redemption when the tech has matured. People didn't like early brick cellphones, they didn't like CLI PCs, they didn't like early TVs with limited programming.
As Steve Jobs said (paraphrasing), the goal is to build products that people will want before people realize they want it. Apple started out as a PC company building out a market that the masses didn't care about until 15 years later, a market that was considered dead, a fad, in search of a use, many times throughout its emergence.
VR will either be accepted or rejected when the tech has matured. When 90% of the planet doesn't know what VR even stands for in 2023, you can't expect them to make a rational decision. When most people right now can't imagine how VR will evolve beyond higher resolution, their opinion carries little weight.
> Ironically, instead all this pissing about you could make quite normal VR etc. far more mainstream - it's more viable this time round than ever before.
> But nobody wants this mixed reality bollocks.
Good Mixed Reality is an objective upgrade to every VR user. It makes VR safer and easier to use even if you don't use any MR-specific applications.
LilMoWithTheGimpyLeg t1_jbxrisp wrote
Reply to comment by MrFluffyhead80 in Tim Cook bets on Apple’s mixed-reality headset to secure his legacy by DarthBuzzard
ThornyBeard t1_jbxqgae wrote
Paywall
MrFluffyhead80 t1_jbxpzq2 wrote
Reply to comment by Cabshank in Tim Cook bets on Apple’s mixed-reality headset to secure his legacy by DarthBuzzard
What bugs?
MrFluffyhead80 t1_jbxpyiq wrote
I was going to get the Meta ones for a gift, but maybe I’ll just wait and have my wife get these ones
MrFluffyhead80 t1_jbxpvuv wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Tim Cook bets on Apple’s mixed-reality headset to secure his legacy by DarthBuzzard
They are calling the bankruptcy attorneys now
MrFluffyhead80 t1_jbxpsq4 wrote
Reply to comment by Rudecles in Tim Cook bets on Apple’s mixed-reality headset to secure his legacy by DarthBuzzard
Where did you get this nonsense?
stiegosaurus t1_jbxpr3w wrote
Lol good luck with the gimmicks
[deleted] t1_jbxph7f wrote
[deleted]
CryonautX t1_jbxpcg9 wrote
Stop pushing for VR. The tech isn't there yet.
ledow t1_jbxp4sm wrote
Nobody wants it.
We had sci-fi desires of smartphones for decades, we just didn't call them that.
But nobody is sitting there wanting Tron to happen.
Ironically, instead all this pissing about you could make quite normal VR etc. far more mainstream - it's more viable this time round than ever before.
But nobody wants this mixed reality bollocks.
Rudecles t1_jbxltfa wrote
Considering Apple hasn’t done anything innovative since Jobs, this is another conservative move by Cook to not get left behind in case Meta succeeds. It’ll be a product that costs 3 times as much as what’s on the market and only the fanboys will think it’s revolutionary. Also it’ll be as ergonomic as a brick.
Eversnuffley t1_jbxl9fl wrote
Reply to comment by joeshmoe9898 in Tim Cook bets on Apple’s mixed-reality headset to secure his legacy by DarthBuzzard
Clunky and awkward - exactly like today's vr devices. If Apple nails it, it could be a similar revolution.
Dr_Icchan t1_jbxl5co wrote
Reply to comment by N1NJAREB0RN in Tim Cook bets on Apple’s mixed-reality headset to secure his legacy by DarthBuzzard
worked so well for Microsoft and google people have already forgot about them.
joeshmoe9898 t1_jbxkyz3 wrote
Reply to comment by Eversnuffley in Tim Cook bets on Apple’s mixed-reality headset to secure his legacy by DarthBuzzard
I would half disagree. Smartphones weren’t popular because the interface and capabilities were clunky and awkward. Steve summed it up in that first keynote, iPod + Phone + Internet communicator. They knew they had created a new class of product, I don’t think anyone could have known HOW BIG the market would be. To me, what set it apart was the interface and that the tech had evolved enough to create a smooth experience in a compact form factor (the first iPhone was pretty small!)
I do agree though that the competition now is a totally different situation. Apple was competing with Palm, Sony, & Blackberry. Not every major tech brand.
[deleted] t1_jbxjgn9 wrote
[deleted]
Eversnuffley t1_jbxj7nm wrote
Reply to comment by joeshmoe9898 in Tim Cook bets on Apple’s mixed-reality headset to secure his legacy by DarthBuzzard
Smartphone were far from obvious at the time. Everyone else was trying to shrink their phones. Now we all have roofing shingles in our pockets.
Cabshank t1_jbxisdv wrote
It will go the way of google glass, don’t invest so much apple, fix the bugs in iOS instead
DarthBuzzard OP t1_jbxhrnd wrote
Reply to comment by N1NJAREB0RN in Tim Cook bets on Apple’s mixed-reality headset to secure his legacy by DarthBuzzard
Zuck hasn't expected any market takeoff until the mid to late 2020s, so the jury is still out.
joeshmoe9898 t1_jbxg8u3 wrote
Reply to comment by N1NJAREB0RN in Tim Cook bets on Apple’s mixed-reality headset to secure his legacy by DarthBuzzard
I’m also skeptical but it’s very different for a social media company to try to develop success as a hardware design company. If you made a short list of companies that would successfully develop a headset that helps it go mainstream, Apple would have to be near the top of that list.
Again, I’m skeptical. This seems like a less obvious win than smartphones were and there’s already much more competition in the VR space than there was in smart phones in 2008. If they do something extraordinary, I suspect it will be from an interface innovation.
N1NJAREB0RN t1_jbxfuz7 wrote
It’s worked out so well for Zucc.
🙄
6SixTy t1_jbvbyub wrote
Reply to comment by NotAnADC in Adorable Playdate handheld gets new free games alongside $20 price increase by SAT0725
Valve made a PC, not a console. Once its in your hands, you can do whatever you want hardware or software wise. Very big distinction to make.
And yeah, I had to make a correction +2d after your comment it was that off
RedditMcBurger t1_jbuwvvi wrote
Reply to comment by crimsonblueku in The iPhone 15’s USB-C port might come with a catch - new report says third-party cables might not support fast charging by MicroSofty88
I mean you can easily buy a 45W+ usb c charger for like $20~
joeshmoe9898 t1_jbxvofs wrote
Reply to comment by Eversnuffley in Tim Cook bets on Apple’s mixed-reality headset to secure his legacy by DarthBuzzard
Agreed. I feel like we’re saying the same thing.