Recent comments in /f/gadgets

AnEngineer2018 t1_jch0gwl wrote

Burning any chemical with chlorine would be an incredibly ineffective way to produce phosgene gas. Past 200C it’s just going to form chlorine and carbon monoxide, which elemental chlorine in the air is probably going to find some nitrogen to team up with, hence the widely reported pool smell.

Just leaving any chemical with chlorine on the ground is likely to just deep through the ground until it finds a source of sodium and the sodium and chlorine do what they do best.

Between the pool smell, rashes and burns, and dead things in ditch water, and ignoring god know what other chemicals are just in ditch water from field run off, most likely explanation is that some people, and animals, were just exposed to elemental chlorine dissolved in water.

−1

what595654 t1_jcgzrjl wrote

Did you not read what he said? You are just looking at whether it goes up or down. Being perfectly accurate is not necessary.

Its like if you had a weight scale. If it told you, tomorrow that you gained 15.3 lbs, and you repeated... and it said 13.9 lbs... 17.6 lbs, so on. It doesnt matter the exactness. The point is, your weight went up a lot in one day. That is good enough to make decisions on. Not for scientific studies.

6

Yobanyyo t1_jcgxc06 wrote

I live in a stretch of land called Cancer Alley, tons of industry right next door to the state Capitol.

For me it would be a fun project, second I don't trust the industry to self report, third I don't always trust state agencies due to how governance and the petrochemical industry fuck in the same bed.

1

-peas- t1_jcgv5ro wrote

I made & coded my own array of various sensors and have a blower/laser pm2.5 sensor, and I care not about its scientific accuracy, but I care about its ability to be able to tell me when air quality on my deck gets worse. It does that immediately with an LED that shines into my window with various colors depending on EPA air quality math. It could be huge percentages off scientifically accurate, but its going to tell me that the air quality got much worse. Its pm2.5 numbers are close to other stations around me regardless, but it definitely isn't a scientific instrument.

I'm not sure if most people buying these things care about its scientific accuracy, mainly just if things are getting worse outside.

3

John_Yossarian t1_jcgtx7z wrote

> Would've been much easier with an ESP32 or Arduino board...

That's what I came here looking for. I made an ESP32/BME680 climate sensor a few months ago and haven't gotten around to calibrating/deploying it, was hoping I could pivot and turn it into an outdoor citizen science project

1