Recent comments in /f/gadgets
sleight42 t1_jch4zss wrote
Reply to comment by Now_with_more_cheese in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
That's.... a long list. And no prices listed.
$100ish just for the enclosure and unknown for the electronics.
This seems more costly than several closed source solutions.
sleight42 t1_jch4v9u wrote
Reply to comment by redratus in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
See above in the thread.
The electronics are complicated—at least to someone somewhat inept with such things.
mazamayomama t1_jch4m2h wrote
Reply to comment by owczareknietrzymryjs in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
https://www2.purpleair.com/ is big in US already
SANPres09 t1_jch4g1e wrote
Reply to comment by careful_spongebob in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Oooh, that looks awesome. Thanks!
a_a_ronc t1_jch3feb wrote
Reply to comment by I-seddit in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Yeah I edited a comment above with that finding. I was on mobile and didn’t see the tab
I-seddit t1_jch3c84 wrote
Reply to Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
In the paper it defines "low cost" as less than $2500 - so I'm curious what the actual part cost is...
I-seddit t1_jch34tf wrote
Reply to comment by a_a_ronc in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
2nd spreadsheet tab on your link shows a sensor
Merrughi t1_jch0shv wrote
Reply to comment by solo_loso in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Here is a popular design for an indoor sensor
https://www.airgradient.com/open-airgradient/instructions/diy-v3/
AnEngineer2018 t1_jch0gwl wrote
Reply to comment by 3226 in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Burning any chemical with chlorine would be an incredibly ineffective way to produce phosgene gas. Past 200C it’s just going to form chlorine and carbon monoxide, which elemental chlorine in the air is probably going to find some nitrogen to team up with, hence the widely reported pool smell.
Just leaving any chemical with chlorine on the ground is likely to just deep through the ground until it finds a source of sodium and the sodium and chlorine do what they do best.
Between the pool smell, rashes and burns, and dead things in ditch water, and ignoring god know what other chemicals are just in ditch water from field run off, most likely explanation is that some people, and animals, were just exposed to elemental chlorine dissolved in water.
what595654 t1_jcgzrjl wrote
Reply to comment by Tactically_Fat in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Did you not read what he said? You are just looking at whether it goes up or down. Being perfectly accurate is not necessary.
Its like if you had a weight scale. If it told you, tomorrow that you gained 15.3 lbs, and you repeated... and it said 13.9 lbs... 17.6 lbs, so on. It doesnt matter the exactness. The point is, your weight went up a lot in one day. That is good enough to make decisions on. Not for scientific studies.
findingmike t1_jcgypv9 wrote
Reply to comment by iamnotazombie44 in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Are the compounds going to stay around a long time?
findingmike t1_jcgy1la wrote
Reply to comment by control-alt-deleted in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Found the problem
control-alt-deleted t1_jcgxvg3 wrote
Reply to comment by datavizzard in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Mobile Safari… 🤷
imafraidofmuricans t1_jcgxrad wrote
Reply to comment by solo_loso in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
If you put a sensor in your own home, yes.
Yobanyyo t1_jcgxqro wrote
Reply to comment by PsymonFyrestar in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Or stay indoors where you can filter the air... Do you not know about air pollution and how much of a problem it is for folks with asthma or other breathing issues or just in general?
Neurostarship t1_jcgxdv6 wrote
Reply to comment by TheSufjanshead in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Air quality in polluted cities varies greatly day by day depending on wind. Wind blows away the bad stuff.
Yobanyyo t1_jcgxc06 wrote
Reply to comment by MoirasPurpleOrb in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
I live in a stretch of land called Cancer Alley, tons of industry right next door to the state Capitol.
For me it would be a fun project, second I don't trust the industry to self report, third I don't always trust state agencies due to how governance and the petrochemical industry fuck in the same bed.
[deleted] t1_jcgw1cx wrote
Reply to comment by No-Consideration4985 in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
[removed]
Tactically_Fat t1_jcgvy1s wrote
Reply to comment by -peas- in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
> scientific accuracy
But that's, like, the only real way to know for sure. Otherwise - it's either speculation or generalization?
Accuracy, repeatability, and defensibility.
-peas- t1_jcgv5ro wrote
Reply to comment by Tactically_Fat in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
I made & coded my own array of various sensors and have a blower/laser pm2.5 sensor, and I care not about its scientific accuracy, but I care about its ability to be able to tell me when air quality on my deck gets worse. It does that immediately with an LED that shines into my window with various colors depending on EPA air quality math. It could be huge percentages off scientifically accurate, but its going to tell me that the air quality got much worse. Its pm2.5 numbers are close to other stations around me regardless, but it definitely isn't a scientific instrument.
I'm not sure if most people buying these things care about its scientific accuracy, mainly just if things are getting worse outside.
John_Yossarian t1_jcgtx7z wrote
Reply to comment by GeoAtreides in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
> Would've been much easier with an ESP32 or Arduino board...
That's what I came here looking for. I made an ESP32/BME680 climate sensor a few months ago and haven't gotten around to calibrating/deploying it, was hoping I could pivot and turn it into an outdoor citizen science project
red_purple_red t1_jcgrz2e wrote
Reply to Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Open-source means open for the NSA to covertly install backdoors.
Enzo_GS t1_jcgowon wrote
Reply to Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
there is a pizzaria chimney right next to my room's window, i wonder if this can help me
solo_loso t1_jcgnx1z wrote
Reply to comment by Mr_Em-3 in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
lol
redratus t1_jch74zc wrote
Reply to comment by sleight42 in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Is there anywhere where you can just buy one?