Recent comments in /f/gadgets
Dortmunddd t1_jchfw69 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
I would also want to know the “worst” air outside my house for walking, not the “best” air on the mountain.
HarmoniousJ t1_jchfnp3 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Next time maybe you can refrain from moving goal posts when your previous assertions don't stand up to scrutiny.
[deleted] t1_jchfno6 wrote
Reply to comment by JasonDJ in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
[deleted]
JasonDJ t1_jchfens wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Like Reddit, the huge for-profit social media empire that still had an 8 hour long near-full outage a couple days ago? Yeah.
Except it seems like there’s a lot more client-side stuff happening on this non-profit open-source site. From what I could load before by browser crashed, at least.
I’m not faulting this site, either. If anything the biggest fault is auto-loading a world map. It’d probably be better to not do that and either get location and zoom in locally, or ask for location. I’d also think that it’s probably better to scrape programmatically (I.e., have something on a HomeAssistant Dashboard that gets the air quality for your specific location) and I’d guess that most people wouldn’t interact with the main page directly.
iRhcp182 t1_jchf5ki wrote
Reply to comment by UnderGrownGreenRoad in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
What you see in your weather app is very different from what the city scanner shows. How air quality is usually measured is by using 5-6 fixed research grade sensors. The measurements from these stations are used plus some meteorological variables (wind speed+direction, relative humidity, temperature) to model air quality over a larger area. The city scanners however show that air quality can differ a factor 10 on a micro scale. Meaning that these models can wildly over or under estimate air quality at specific locations. These scanners are thus used to create a higher resolution air quality map.
[deleted] t1_jchez1c wrote
Reply to comment by HarmoniousJ in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
[deleted]
can_dry t1_jchevtv wrote
Reply to comment by SANPres09 in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
The main particulate sensor is this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yx5JS1cVh6g&t=3s
Costs approx. $100.
HarmoniousJ t1_jchek8y wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
You should probably brush up on connectivity, No one except for you seems to want to die on this hill that mobile is more effective than ethernet with speed.
Most programmers seem to know this already.
Federal_Zombie_9456 t1_jcheckb wrote
Reply to comment by 2001zhaozhao in PotatoP Laptop Aims for Two Years of Battery Life by diacewrb
😆
[deleted] t1_jche6kr wrote
Reply to comment by HarmoniousJ in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
[deleted]
Maktube t1_jche2z8 wrote
Reply to comment by Tactically_Fat in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
When the right conversion is applied -- as it is by default -- PA2 sensors are actually pretty close to the official EPA sensors. Like, they produce the exact same AQI 90-95% of the time, and they're within 5ug/m^3 >98% of the time. They predict the wrong category (good/moderate/UHSG/etc) basically never (<1% of the time) and when they do it's typically because the value was right on the line between two categories.
Even if that weren't the case, though, they fill in a major gap in the EPA sensor setup that no one talks about. There aren't that many EPA sensors out there, but if you go to the EPA website to look at air quality, it will show you a value for everywhere on the map. It does this by interpolating between sensor stations and taking into account weather data. This is often not just wrong, but so wildly wrong that I think it's irresponsible to even show it. The PA2 sensors could be a factor of 2 off the official values and still be more useful than that map, because they're everywhere and they're consistent. They would regularly report dangerous air quality values in regions that the EPA map does not, which is a lot more valuable than being right on the money in terms of the actual numbers (though again, they pretty much are always right on the money).
HarmoniousJ t1_jchdqd0 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
There's a difference between one wanting something to be true and whether or not it actually is. I know you love your mobile and use it for everything but it's still not the fastest.
And I'm not saying this will always be the case, I'm just saying you live in a future that doesn't exist yet.
Believe me, I'd love to be able to program everything using my Fold 3 but the damn thing hates most things that aren't Android.
sleight42 t1_jchdk2g wrote
Reply to comment by redratus in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Not as far as I can see yet.
[deleted] t1_jchdk0e wrote
Reply to comment by JasonDJ in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jchdd24 wrote
Reply to comment by HarmoniousJ in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
[deleted]
zkareface t1_jchd4ny wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Can blame apple for not having a solid browser in last 20+ years.
JasonDJ t1_jchcocr wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Big difference between a single POST operation and grabbing and rendering an interactive site with tons of data points on it though…
Sent from Apollo for IOS
HarmoniousJ t1_jchcgs8 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Look, your favorite platform is not under attack right now. That's not the point I'm trying to make.
What I'm saying is that some programming work is better off using an ethernet cable than a cellular connection. Sorry my guy, mobile is not what they use in MIT for weather updates or small incremental changes. They still use ethernet for that.
[deleted] t1_jchc2j5 wrote
Reply to comment by HarmoniousJ in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
[deleted]
fishbulbx t1_jchbc7a wrote
Reply to comment by Now_with_more_cheese in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
GPS, solar power, LTE antenna... this isn't a cheap solution for checking air quality... it might be a cheap solution to have a fully portable self-powered air quality sensor.
orientbambino t1_jchavqd wrote
I have a 14 and its pretty good but the price has really made me start wondering if flagships are even worth it anymore or if I could just get by on a midrange android. I don't really game on the phone so maxed out specs I'm not sure I even need. I'm getting old so pretty much all heavy lifting is getting done on a tablet or a computer now.
HarmoniousJ t1_jch94b7 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Do not mobile for any program that needs a moderately steady connection, that is also dealing in precise minute by minute measurements.
Is that better? Mobile is still lacking in precision work, whether or not that will be true in a few years is up for grabs still.
[deleted] t1_jch8r5w wrote
Reply to comment by HarmoniousJ in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
[deleted]
HarmoniousJ t1_jch7mrd wrote
Reply to comment by control-alt-deleted in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Do not mobile for a program that needs a moderately steady connection.
iRhcp182 t1_jchgj8j wrote
Reply to comment by GeoAtreides in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
They are using the alphasense optical particle counter