Recent comments in /f/gadgets
JimJohnes t1_jcipyi3 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Market share of iOS is less than half that of Android (27% vs 72%). Same goes for Chrome and Chromium based browsers - so that's where web developers priorities of optimization and debugging are.
[deleted] t1_jcio8p8 wrote
Reply to comment by TricoMex in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
[deleted]
Yobanyyo t1_jcikob7 wrote
Reply to comment by PsymonFyrestar in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Gosh imma a sensitive Sally somedays, sorry bud
jqubed t1_jcik7k2 wrote
Reply to comment by JohnEdwa in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
So around 3x component cost? That sounds about right for a consumer electronics product in the U.S. Maybe high if they’re keeping data from the devices for commercial use.
redldr1 t1_jciirw3 wrote
Reply to comment by control-alt-deleted in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
It's a luxury brand pretending it's technology made by child labor.
ftfy
shalol t1_jciihf9 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
> Beyond that, mobile safari is the backing engine for all browsers on ios devices, even Chrome.
^(*Because Apple forces every IOS browser to use their engine, everything is just a reskin of safari)
PsymonFyrestar t1_jcihf5t wrote
Reply to comment by Yobanyyo in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Sigh, it was just sarcasm. Forgot the obligatory /s.
qichael t1_jcigsz4 wrote
Reply to Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
i would actually rather they be working on an AI model that starts a nuclear conflict
Spread_Liberally t1_jcifv2t wrote
Reply to comment by No-Consideration4985 in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
This sounds like Trump's reasonable for not COVID testing.
Air quality is great as long as you don't test it near pollution!
Spread_Liberally t1_jciffwf wrote
Reply to comment by fishbulbx in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
I mean, home users could skip the solar power, LTE components, and enter coordinates manually instead of using GPS.
[deleted] t1_jcietiu wrote
Reply to comment by what595654 in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
[removed]
argparg t1_jciemas wrote
Reply to Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Part list?
ElSatchmo t1_jcie4ks wrote
Reply to comment by SANPres09 in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
A lot of communities use PurpleAir air sensors. They measure PM 2.5 and only cost around $200 iirc.
Igagug t1_jcicr6q wrote
Reply to comment by MadOrange64 in iPhone 15 Pro Predicted to See First Price Increase Since iPhone X by [deleted]
Them and everyone else
markmaksym t1_jcibibk wrote
Reply to Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
I live next to a top 3 busiest airport in the US. Wonder how much shit is spewed out in the air every 30 seconds that a plane passes over my house.
JohnEdwa t1_jcia5hw wrote
Reply to comment by supercobra78 in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
But it doesn't have to be that expensive. That Purpleair Flex has a BME688, $13.5 in single quantity (<$7 if you buy in bulk), and two PMS-6003 which are around $40 in single quantity. Asking for $270 for a device that's idea is to gather crowd sourced data is a bit steep.
Meanwhile the European project uses a kit that costs less than $50 to put together, and that's in single quantity by people ordering the stuff from aliexpress.
[deleted] t1_jci7mg6 wrote
Reply to comment by HarmoniousJ in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jci7iwf wrote
Reply to comment by JimJohnes in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
[deleted]
Skyhawk_Squawk t1_jci7huu wrote
Reply to comment by JellyWaffles in Zipline’s new drones release tethered mini-drones for precision package deliveries - These drone deliveries drop down from up to 300 feet high in a tethered ‘droid’ with its own propellers to target small landing zones like a table. by speckz
call me skeptical that any company will use them if they are even a fraction more expensive than traditional propellers. why would they do the right thing when there’s money to be made?
supercobra78 t1_jci77qv wrote
Reply to comment by Tricon916 in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Like it or not, the hardware for these sensors are not cheap.
iamaredditboy t1_jci62fh wrote
Reply to Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Isn’t air quality data published already online
speech_freedom t1_jci53by wrote
Reply to Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
We also measure Beijing's Air Quality and publishes it for free. I suppose China is not that generous to publish ours. Fuck China.
control-alt-deleted t1_jci3or9 wrote
Reply to comment by redldr1 in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
It’s a phone, bruv. It’s a phone.
JimJohnes t1_jci2uqx wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
Since when did mobile Safari is 'most largely represented browser'?
Edit: for non believers - Chrome 66%, Safari 24%
douglasg14b t1_jciros5 wrote
Reply to comment by sleight42 in Open-source tool from MIT’s Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply. by chrisdh79
> That's.... a long list
The list has 19 components, that's not a long list at all?
> $100ish just for the enclosure and unknown for the electronics.
The model numbers are there, you can price them out! It's not a big mystery.