Recent comments in /f/gadgets
celaconacr t1_jdfioj0 wrote
Reply to comment by QuietGanache in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
Razer Core X and similar eGPUs seem to do ok. I have seen a RTX 3080 rated at about 20% slower than on a desktop. Slightly better if you don't have to return the graphics output back down the thunderbolt connection. A large amount of memory on the cards can certainly help with the bandwidth. I can't really see it being an issue for most graphics cards when heat will stop them first in a laptop.
kardiogramm t1_jdfhurp wrote
Reply to comment by ThePhysicsOfBaseball in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
It’s not minimalist, so many unnecessary aspects to the design, the odd taper and curve that make it look like any laptop. The thing I love most about it is the top lid (not the hinge) of the screen, that is minimalist, if only that carried on throughout the rest of the casing.
A MacBook Pro or a Google Chromebook Pixel from 2015 is minimalist.
I think they have dumbed it down too much with the focus ease of upgradability. Personally I could just do with a minimalist design with built in (but user replaceable/repairable) ports and insides (with upgradability in mind) along with a screen (with windows hello camera) that can be replaced. Have a magnetic power charger similar to MagSafe or use a USB 4.0 port for charging too. USB 4.0 with a digital line in/headphone jack (again replaceable from the inside without it being a module) and have a nicely designed flush take on an ExpressCard type slot for the other side to slot in other optional ports.
mkayyyy01 t1_jdfdxiw wrote
Reply to comment by Gronx-quately89 in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
They also announced today that they are going to be selling a case for main boards. Cool stuff
nathanfay t1_jdfdv3x wrote
How uncivilized
Modullah t1_jdfcgth wrote
Reply to comment by ThePhysicsOfBaseball in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
The MacBook Air is minimalist. To be fair, for a modular laptop their design is fairly minimal but I think they are a few iterations away from MacBook level minimalism. Great work though, I hope they keep doing well.
CreepperReaper t1_jdfaxjk wrote
Reply to [Giveaway] Plugable Thunderbolt 4 Quad Dock & Thunderbolt 4 Hub – Intel Thunderbolt 4. by noeatnosleep
definitely need one for streaming so much equipment to hook up!
Gronx-quately89 t1_jdfa6fn wrote
Reply to comment by bebova in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
You don't have to toss that old motherboard either. You can buy or 3D print a case for it and use it as a mini desktop if you want.
ThePhysicsOfBaseball t1_jdf8fus wrote
Reply to comment by kardiogramm in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
How is the original 13 and the new 16 not minimalist?
Seriously, at some point you're just complaining to complain.
Customfreak567 t1_jdf5oqg wrote
Reply to comment by yelahneb in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
The whole point is to reduce e-waste. The laptops should hopefully keep getting upgrades. That way if you want a new cpu you get a new main board and cpu and not a whole new chassis. Old one can be sent back
kardiogramm t1_jdf4vrx wrote
I was really hoping they would refine their design for a larger laptop but they doubled down on the previous aesthetics.
Really all I want is a repairable and a user upgradable take on a minimalist laptop , why is this so hard?
[deleted] t1_jdf3ne8 wrote
Reply to comment by Tobacco_Bhaji in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
[removed]
QuietGanache t1_jdf3ixa wrote
Reply to comment by nipsen in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
I think you're mixing and matching your bits and bytes.
QuietGanache t1_jdf3f1y wrote
Reply to comment by dryingsocks in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
Thunderbolt tops out at 40Gb/s, PCIe gen 4 x16 tops out at 32GB/s. This means that things like textures and new geometries will load much more slowly so while it might be fine for CAD, you'll encounter issues with gaming, especially with modern engines that use much more refined levels of detail.
yelahneb t1_jdf1ufw wrote
Reply to comment by JimNixon in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
Is the cost of the laptop + the 11 gen motherboard + the 12 gen greater or lesser than the cost of a comparable laptop matching the specs of the 12 gen
plutoniaex t1_jdf1eic wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
Why not just expose the PCIe as an external port then?
JimNixon t1_jdf1dro wrote
Reply to comment by yelahneb in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
They've already released a 12th gen motherboard for the Framework 13 inch version to allow owners to upgrade from 11th gen.
ChrisFromIT t1_jdf0wnu wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
Nope. USB4's bandwidth in symmetric mode is 80 Gbps. While PCIe 4.0 x16 is 32 GBps. The difference is big B, bytes vs little b, bits. USB4 is 80 Gbits per second or 10 GBytes per second. While PCIe 4.0 x16 is 32 GBytes per second.
USB4's bandwidth would be the equivalent of PCIe 2.0 x16 or PCIe 3.0 x8. Just slightly higher bandwidth that that.
ChrisFromIT t1_jdf0bhu wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
USB4 2.0 almost has enough bandwidth to carry a modern GPU. It would have a bit more bandwidth than a PCIe 3.0 x8 slot or a bit more bandwidth than a PCIe 2.0 x16 slot. And with the 4090 desktop, you lose about 6% performance if you use a PCIe 2.0 x16 slot vs. a PCIe 4.0 x16 slot.
proscriptus t1_jdezcdv wrote
Reply to [Giveaway] Plugable Thunderbolt 4 Quad Dock & Thunderbolt 4 Hub – Intel Thunderbolt 4. by noeatnosleep
I *just* had an Anker dock die, I could seriously use a replacement.
dryingsocks t1_jdeyicc wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
surely it's plenty for most people, especially in a laptop
yelahneb t1_jdey8ts wrote
This is pretty cool, but tech companies have no monetary incentive to keep providing compatible upgrades to a single machine. They need us to buy new laptops every 2 or 3 years to maintain their profit margins.
[deleted] t1_jdexhp4 wrote
Reply to comment by dryingsocks in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
Yeah but it's still not quite there speed-wise. The bottleneck is still there.
[deleted] t1_jdexa56 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
[deleted]
nipsen t1_jdewl7i wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in The Framework Laptop 16 promises the “holy grail” of upgradable graphics. by SUPRVLLAN
..Without going into a huge rant here about why pci-e exists, and how absurdly obsolete it is - usb4 has 80Gbps transfer rates (same as pci-ex16, in ..theory).
Saino_Moore t1_jdfkd83 wrote
Reply to Feds Stalked Suspects With an Apple AirTag, Report Says by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
AirPods are better for tracking, can just claim it was misplaced.
Edit: wow so much hate for a joke.