Recent comments in /f/gadgets

NextTrillion t1_jedsg06 wrote

>+5 plus years.

Ehm, sorry, 5 years ago? Try 20. Here’s Phil Askey, founder of DPReview (RIP) on the Minolta DiMAGE X in 2002:

>Just when you thought a 2 megapixel, 3x optical zoom digital camera couldn't get any smaller Minolta turn things on their heads (literally) and produce the diminutive DiMAGE X. This shirt-pocket sized digital camera is just 20 mm thin (0.8 in) and 84 x 72 mm (3.3 x 2.8 in) from the front and weighs in (fully loaded) at just 155 g (5.5 oz). With specs like that you'd be expecting a fixed focal length lens, but no Minolta have innovated, the zoom mechanism is actually on its side within the body of the camera with a prism reflecting the image seen through the first lens element (Minolta dub this 'Folded Optics').

I actually prefer “folded optics,” but looks like periscope is likely going to be the way. Suppose it sounds ‘cooler’ or something.

4

AFerociousPineapple t1_jed76sp wrote

Well you’re in luck if you’ve been waiting for this specific feature it came out on a bunch of phones last year:

Samsung Galaxy S22 ultra, Huawei P50 Pro, Honor Magic 4 Pro, Vivo X80 Pro, ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

Edit: mobile sucks so changed formatting)

7

pgriss t1_jec6dlq wrote

Was this article written by AI?

What does this mean:

> if the company still changes the naming principle.

How does this make sense:

> Kuo claims that the Largan periscope unit costs only $4. In addition, at such a price, the company allegedly cannot make a profit from this direction.

Why is the low cost of the unit an impediment on making profit? Are they trying to say that Apple is only willing to pay $4 for the unit?

60

Winjin t1_jec2awv wrote

I'm still at XR I got as a present. Only thing I did was paid some hacksmiths to install way more memory in it.

The camera really lags behind in comparison to newer models, but other than that it's still really good.

−1