Recent comments in /f/gadgets
recursive-analogy t1_iv8ch6j wrote
Reply to Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
>use it to “see through walls,” or, rather, approximate the location of devices via sneaky scanning.
I have an "invisibility cloak", or rather, a sign that says don't look at me
CheeseSteak17 t1_iv89w1n wrote
Reply to comment by Orcwin in Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
Yeah, those parts alone are less than $20, so it probably includes expedited shipping.
Orcwin t1_iv86lvy wrote
Reply to comment by dillrepair in Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
No. It will be able to see which devices are connected, not where in the house those devices are. The concept from the article has multiple radios, and can therefore do triangulation of the received signals.
Orcwin t1_iv86civ wrote
Reply to comment by Skratymir in Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
I suspect the writer misunderstood, and the cost is for the custom electronics attached to it. That will add up to about that much (less if you import straight from China). Those ESP boards are dirt cheap and quite versatile.
bubbbert t1_iv84vtf wrote
Reply to Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
What is the name of the $20 drone?
JohannesOliver t1_iv84fqq wrote
Reply to comment by Ownza in Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
Maybe, if they were able to. For what it is I think that could be difficult though.
Ownza t1_iv83se7 wrote
Reply to comment by JohannesOliver in Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
>they could not use this without a warrant.
You mean that they would use parallel construction after knowing what they know after using it, and wouldn't tell you they used it. You wouldn't know they used it.
JohannesOliver t1_iv82oju wrote
Reply to comment by zain_monti in Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
Absolutely not. GCHQ does the same stuff the NSA does, but your overt surveillance (CCTV and the like) is significantly more than the US has. I think they probably like that the US gets all the publicity though.
In the US the cops have to ask private citizens for CCTV footage much of the time. Ring kind of let them in without doing that, but it is still a private entity.
JohannesOliver t1_iv82e10 wrote
Reply to comment by beaverbait in Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
It’s about criminal charges, they could not use this without a warrant. Mass surveillance is something else, the government will do what the government wants to do.
The cited case was regarding a person suspected of a marijuana grow. The police used thermal imaging without a warrant to get a conviction. The Supreme Court determined it was considered a search by the fourth amendment (5-4 decision, btw). That would be similar here.
liz-lemon-eyeroll t1_iv817uu wrote
zain_monti t1_iv7yqet wrote
Reply to comment by Dependent-Clerk8754 in Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
Na I always thought the usa was more then a surveillance society the us
TactlessTortoise t1_iv7x79t wrote
Reply to comment by beaverbait in Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
Yeah, MKultra was also illegal. Still happened lol.
LowBadger3622 t1_iv7vvnc wrote
Reply to Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
You mean you want me to facilitate you taking control of everybody’s phone in the city? I won’t do it
SergeiPutin t1_iv7uux4 wrote
Reply to comment by I_LOVE_PURPLE_PUPPY in Samsung is building an “8K” ultrawide monitor to succeed its massive Odyssey Neo G9 by Sirisian
Consider this:
To use a 32" 4k monitor, you need to place it at the same distance as a notebook, so you can see it just like you see a 16" 1080p screen (you wouldn't push that screen farther away).
Now if you replace that screen with a 65" 8k, you'd need to keep that distance, and you'd end up with a ginourmous screen very close to your face. I just went close to my 65" TV and it doesn't make sense.
Either you place the screen close and your eyes get tired from movement, or you place a larger screen farther away and get tired from focusing on distance.
Skratymir t1_iv7uq2p wrote
Reply to Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
"20$ off the shelf drone"
shows 500$ dji camera drone
Sirisian t1_iv7tqjb wrote
Reply to Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
Wi-Fi device positioning is incredibly old. Students at my university used a similar technique for triangulating people. Using a drone though is interesting as it can quickly fly around getting a lot of measurements at specific locations.
I_LOVE_PURPLE_PUPPY t1_iv7t0rd wrote
Reply to comment by SergeiPutin in Samsung is building an “8K” ultrawide monitor to succeed its massive Odyssey Neo G9 by Sirisian
The pixel density on a 65" 8K screen is the same as a 32" 4K screen. Just treat it like a dual (or quad) monitor setup without any bezels in between.
create360 t1_iv7so9x wrote
EgalitarianCrusader t1_iv7s9c3 wrote
Reply to Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
Wasn't there something revealed recently that used wi-fi to literally view PEOPLE (not devices) through walls?
Edit: Video link is here.
ecksate t1_iv7s54o wrote
Reply to comment by dillrepair in Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
Anyone who can receive the signal from your router can see through the walls. Your router doesn't know where you are in your house.
The article probably answers your questions if you care to click it.
pixelbased t1_iv7rqkv wrote
Reply to comment by create360 in Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
I imagine that there might be a desire to see trough walls that are taller than what a handheld device would be capable of reaching…like if you had to see through the walls of the 40th floor of a building from the ground. Aside, this thing is horrific and doesn’t need to be made. We need privacy laws.
create360 t1_iv7rdms wrote
dillrepair t1_iv7o8gq wrote
Reply to Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
Okay so anyone hacked into my router (government etc) can use the router to do the exact same thing right?
beaverbait t1_iv7o48i wrote
Reply to comment by Dependent-Clerk8754 in Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
Only after the government gets caught doing it and only if any of the corrupt system actaually holds them accountable. Which is unlikely at best.
Cellosv t1_iv8cjjb wrote
Reply to Researchers create a Drone That Can 'See Through Walls' With Wifi | At the University of Waterloo recently fixed one up with a scanning device that is the definition of invasive. by chrisdh79
Funny my professor was talking about this years ago. Not the article but how WiFi could he used like an X-ray to see things since we use WiFi everywhere .