Recent comments in /f/gadgets
StrategicBlenderBall t1_iwgigpd wrote
Reply to comment by damattdanman in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
Nuclear forensics, nonproliferation modeling, etc.
BLACK-C4T t1_iwgierp wrote
Reply to comment by jahwls in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
Will be more, it just doesn't make sense to upgrade everytime something better comes along
AlltheCopics t1_iwgie5e wrote
Reply to comment by JJagaimo in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
Aight
krokotak47 t1_iwghwko wrote
Reply to comment by Sarah_Rainbow in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
So cloud computing literally happens in the sky and we don't need hardware for it?
Sarah_Rainbow t1_iwghri2 wrote
Reply to comment by dddd0 in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
Thats awesome, thanks!
dddd0 t1_iwghfua wrote
Reply to comment by Sarah_Rainbow in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
Interconnect
Supercomputer nodes are usually connected using 100-200 Gbit/s fabrics with latencies in the microsecond range. That's pretty expensive and requires a lot of power, too, but it allows you to treat a supercomputer much more like one Really Big Computer (and previous generations of supercomputers were indeed SSI - Single System Image - systems) instead of A Bunch Of Servers. Simulations like Really Big Computers instead of A Bunch Of Servers. On an ELI5 level something like a weather simulation will divide the world into many regions and each node of a supercomputer handles one region. Interactions between regions are handled through the interconnect, so it's really important for performance.
Avieshek OP t1_iwgh5i4 wrote
Reply to comment by 12358 in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
As said, Quantum & Classical are different breed of computers where there’s no parallel between and please refrain from twisting into your own version where nothing has been said regarding “Quantum being more powerful than Supercomputer” when I have just stated what supercomputer itself is to be comparing with quantum which is dumb.
12358 t1_iwggr2p wrote
Reply to comment by Avieshek in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
Quantum computers are not a more powerful version of a supercomputer; they do different kinds of calculations, and solve problems differently, so they are used to solve different kinds of problems. They are not a replacement for supercomputers.
jollingo t1_iwgglb3 wrote
The real question is can it run crysis at max settings?
12358 t1_iwggel6 wrote
And BTW, they run Arch, right?
calvin4224 t1_iwgfzlw wrote
Reply to comment by Gnash_ in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
irl a nuclear Generator has around 1 GW (1000MW). But 30MW is still about 6 Land based Wind turbines running at full load. It's a lot!
Sarah_Rainbow t1_iwgfy31 wrote
Serious question, what is the need for supercomputers when you have access to cloud computing in all its glory?
depressedbee t1_iwgfvjf wrote
Reply to comment by Zeraleen in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
Yea maybe, but can it run Crysis?
chillinwithmypizza t1_iwgftvr wrote
Reply to comment by Contortionietzsche in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
Wouldn’t they lease it though 🤔 Idk any company that outright buys a server
SomeToxicRivenMain t1_iwgfrh7 wrote
Reply to comment by jahwls in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
That’s over 20%!
Catlover419-20 t1_iwgfacd wrote
Reply to comment by MattLogi in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
Nono, that means 30000kWh is for 1h of operation. For one month of 24/7 at 30 days you‘d need 21.600.000 kWh or 21.600 mWh, or 2.741.040€ at 12,69ct/kWh. So $2.75M if Im correct
Diabotek t1_iwgf8be wrote
Reply to comment by MattLogi in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
Lol, not even close. 30,000 kW * 720 hours * kW price.
Gnash_ t1_iwgf457 wrote
Reply to comment by Zeraleen in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
My Factorio factory only consumes 9 MW and I had to build 3 nuclear reactors, just to keep the power up at night. That’s one big supercomputer
Ripcord t1_iwgempu wrote
Reply to comment by supermoderators in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
It's right at the top of the goddamn article
damattdanman t1_iwgegbh wrote
Reply to comment by QuentinUK in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
I get the rest. But national security?
jackfabalous t1_iwgectg wrote
Reply to comment by diacewrb in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
woah that’s cool as fuck 🤯
Defoler t1_iwge3xy wrote
Reply to comment by damattdanman in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
Huge financial models.
Nuclear models.
Environment models.
Things that have millions of millions of data points that you need to calculate each turn
QuentinUK t1_iwgdsbh wrote
Reply to comment by damattdanman in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
Oak Ridge National Laboratory: materials, nuclear science, neutron science, energy, high-performance computing, systems biology and national security.
lastingfreedom t1_iwgdmal wrote
Reply to comment by ChapadozinhoVermelho in Fax for the memories: Ofcom backs death warrant for 80s office staple by diacewrb
Emails are more traceable for backdoor deals.
Contortionietzsche t1_iwgiihr wrote
Reply to comment by chillinwithmypizza in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
You’re probably right.