Recent comments in /f/gadgets
Tigen13 t1_iy0hz75 wrote
Reply to comment by Anasterian1408 in News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
If firefighters have to get on your roof, your house is likely toast anyway.
[deleted] t1_iy0gvas wrote
Sprinkler-of-salt t1_iy0ftr3 wrote
Reply to comment by Haquestions4 in News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
Nah, come on now, that’s unrealistic. The outlets have to get it from somewhere.
Maybe they should be fiber optic instead of electric… then we could send the light directly from the sun into devices!
Sun-powered blender would probably make even healthier smoothies!
musicantz t1_iy0edbz wrote
Reply to comment by LoL_is_pepega_BIA in News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
The payback period on solar is pretty long. It’s even worse without subsidies.
Haquestions4 t1_iy0d89h wrote
Reply to comment by ripped014 in News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
What news?
Haquestions4 t1_iy0cia2 wrote
Reply to comment by Sprinkler-of-salt in News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
What if we just forget all this science and get energy through our outlets?
iamnotazombie44 t1_iy09lw8 wrote
Reply to comment by skittlesmcgee33 in News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
Yeah, IMM tech at NREL is something nutty.
8isinfinitystanding t1_iy08rj7 wrote
Reply to News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
What's the theoretical limit?
AnonymousWritings t1_iy07kcm wrote
Reply to comment by Commisioner_Bush in News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
Only where utilities have idiotic net metering policies right now that let you effectively use your noontime summer production at any time of the year. Resulting in oversupplies if electricity during daylight hours.
Sensible policies that paid people differing amounts depending on what time of day electricity was released to the grid SHOULD be in place and would favor batteries.
AnonymousWritings t1_iy079bu wrote
Reply to comment by michaelb1 in News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
Could be a typo of roof panel
jobe_br t1_iy06std wrote
Reply to comment by Uffffffffffff8372738 in News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
If ever.
michaelb1 t1_iy06i3x wrote
Reply to comment by Ragingsysadmin in News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
Door panels?
Sprinkler-of-salt t1_iy05upz wrote
Reply to comment by Korvanacor in News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
What if we don’t aim for the conductive band of electrons? What if there’s another way to harness the incoming energy?
Or what if there’s a way to “prime” the electrons in the cells such that the valence electrons are already at the conductive band, or somehow less than 2eV away?
If this requires a new atom, why not make one?
What if we forget about atoms altogether, and capture energy at the quarks and gluons?
What if we forget about photons, and harness dark energy instead?
ZenerWasabi t1_iy049bx wrote
Korvanacor t1_iy048w4 wrote
Reply to comment by blastradii in News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
Solar works by using the energy of photons to bump electrons from the valence bands up into the conductive band. These bands are separated by what is called the band gap. If the gap is 2 electron volts (eV) wide and the photon has 3 electron volts, the extra energy is “lost”. Photons with less than 2 eV don’t contribute anything. It’s possible to stack multiple layers with different band gaps to more efficiently capture a wider range of photons but there will still be losses due to interfacial physics that I don’t understand. Each layer adds to the cost of the cell as well
ripped014 t1_iy03yci wrote
Reply to comment by Xenofiler in News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
lol yep, just like raytheon outsources production of the missile components to china
ripped014 t1_iy03rba wrote
Reply to News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
after the china news yesterday watch the westoids line up to 100% believe the US department of energy
willyolio t1_iy037qr wrote
Reply to News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
how efficient would it be with 2 Suns?
a11en t1_iy02dc1 wrote
Reply to comment by MysteriousSophon in News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
It will never reach mass market as a triple junction device. These aren’t cost effective to use terrestrially. The reality is we have space to spread out down here, and up in space there’s no elbow room. So triple junctions head to space and we get single junctions - if we’re lucky at 19% efficiency.
a11en t1_iy022po wrote
Reply to News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
Triple junction device.
Let me know when they do this on a single junction…
darkgothmog t1_iy01q99 wrote
Reply to comment by Commisioner_Bush in News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
Batteries are useful to have higher autonomy. What you produced and not used during the day can be used during the night without buying it. Of course it’s useful
Ragingsysadmin t1_ixzzs8c wrote
Reply to comment by michaelb1 in News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
Why not look into the solar panels that replace your shingles then?
Edit: Solar Panels not door Panel
SlackerAccount t1_ixzxbyr wrote
Reply to comment by AmonWeathertopSul in News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
MoonFall 2
General_Ts0_chicken t1_iy0ip9r wrote
Reply to News Release: NREL Creates Highest Efficiency 1-Sun Solar Cell - 39.5% efficiency by TimeSpentWasting
NREL is amazing, I had the opportunity to do some work there and was blown away by the place.