[removed]

You got something in your mouth

It’s all speculation, why is this part of news?

WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!?!! I need this Apple headset now!

And don’t want it…

It's rumoured to contain an M2, and framerate is always relative to detail level. Quest 2 manages more with less. An M2 for a standalone VR/AR headset is a powerhouse.

As long as it's out before Quest III they should be fine.

Tell that to Facebook who bet the whole farm on it. For Apple this is just one product.

Boo!

It’s not contradictive it’s how it’s been so far. Apple is late to the game but makes a product that actually works, and everybody tweaks theirs to copy what Apple does.

[removed]

Yeah he is a professional predictor.
And almost everything he predicts outside of the already commonly expected, ends up being a bust.

[deleted]

My apple car is parked next to my cyber truck.

But why…..

The quest 2 is a resounding success and has little to do with the failure that is “metaverse” the apps device will probably be twice the price or more with better specs. Both devices and brands will fill their niches.

I mean…do you have a suggestion for another company that could take on the task and implement it in such a way that 100s of millions of people would be comfortable and safe using?

Has “meta” or “alphabet” ever built any single universal platform that didn’t just 100% exploit personal data for money?

I’d prefer a company make money off of hardware and legitimate software sales than just scalping data 24/7

A walled metaverse? No thanks.

Your statement is so contradictive. Others have produced product, but are waiting to copy apple?

Sounds like, once again, others do the pioneering, then apple will step in, release an overpriced underperformer.

Performance specs will be average at best, but apple will claim some new retna display bullshit, fans will eat it up.

Dont get me wrong, its a great business model, it works for apple.

Printed?

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]