Recent comments in /f/gadgets

BIGSTANKDICKDADDY t1_j01nrnh wrote

Ray tracing isn't necessarily about creating "realistic" scenes. It's about creating a realistic model for the behavior of light. It doesn't preclude color grading or any other stylistic flair you want to inject into a final render. Fortnite is a cartoony game that looks pretty great with raytracing. Epic's Matrix demo adopts the same "cold blue" aesthetic from the films. Disney/Pixar use path tracing in their 3D works but nobody would say "Up" or "Frozen" look "realistic", you know?

1

HugeHans t1_j01ma66 wrote

I think ray tracing is fantastic but I also think that realistic doesnt always mean better in this context. Like if I was trying to sell my home and took pictures for the ad with a really good camera the pictures would be very realistic but someone could make my home look much better in photoshop by tweaking the colors and contrast. One is realistic, one is what people like.

2

alcatrazcgp t1_j01iljj wrote

7900xtx matches or sometimes is better at rez performance than the 4080 while being 200$ cheaper, however it's rtx performance is 2 years old, about matching the 3090ti rtx performance.

2

Sevinki t1_j01g9kc wrote

I mean that just depends. For singleplayer games i turn it on if i can still stay above 60 fps because RT does look amazing. For multiplayer its off and most settings are medium or low for max fps.

1

Lachimanus t1_j00njld wrote

Sure, it has been also at top. But they definitely put on a good markup for their name and you have to look what else one pays money for to be part of apple.

Looking alone for the crazy way of handling repairing.

1

Megane_Senpai t1_j006nxm wrote

I am both a game developer and a gamer now and I'd say at least for now I'd happily put on some more work to optimize our game for a wider audience and more range of devices, simply for the profits.

However I too hope one day RT can become a standard feature on mid-range card and above with hardware advancements that make it cost less performance than now (around 20-30% fps instead of 60-80%).

1

rct1 t1_j002xp6 wrote

Anyone YTers got any good benches with a 2080 Ti @ 1440p?

I run an ultra wide 3440x1440p @ 100Hz. My Freesync range is 48-100Hz.

DLSS and ray tracing at 60fps or better is pretty much doable on any game at this res. I can push 4K/30/60 pretty well too if I need to.

People hate on the 2080 Ti cost but I had a top GPU for the lockdown, and most every piece of software has been updated to work better on my card. I still beat a 3070 in most benches and for my money, I’ve been happy with it. Go into settings, put it on ultra and play. If that means DLSS quality, then fine it does.

This is Nvidia fine wine lol. In 2 years, maybe new titles will require DLSS performance. In 4 years, I’ll buy a 4090 used. I’m cool.

1

TunaOnWytNoCrust t1_j0025r2 wrote

I will give it time, but I've decided that it's not worth my money until it's acceptable. Also I usually turn off anti aliasing because it also hurts frames and takes hardware resources that could ironically be used to prevent aliasing.

1