Recent comments in /f/gadgets
its8up t1_j07qadt wrote
Reply to comment by JVM205 in Japan to Manufacture 2nm Chips With a Little Help From IBM by Avieshek
"Do you neeeeeed techno-logy? I just need porn on my phone."
MuhCrea t1_j07q1st wrote
Reply to comment by hellhoundtheone in Japan to Manufacture 2nm Chips With a Little Help From IBM by Avieshek
He's saying a 2nm chip doesn't actually measure as 2nm
JVM205 t1_j07psp4 wrote
Reply to comment by Ralphinader in Japan to Manufacture 2nm Chips With a Little Help From IBM by Avieshek
“Hmmmm I can try, with a little help from IBM”
hellhoundtheone t1_j07oers wrote
Reply to comment by swisstraeng in Japan to Manufacture 2nm Chips With a Little Help From IBM by Avieshek
Are you saying they can produce 2 NM Chips but that doesn’t mean those chips are great ?
Gavri3l t1_j07oc9n wrote
Reply to comment by swisstraeng in Japan to Manufacture 2nm Chips With a Little Help From IBM by Avieshek
Thanks for this. I was really wondering how they managed to get past the quantum tunneling problem.
swisstraeng t1_j07mua3 wrote
(friendly reminder that 2nm is a marketing name and has nothing to do with actual values compared to back when it used to, it's now just a name for a fabrication process)
Ralphinader t1_j07lilh wrote
"I get by with a little help from ibm"
SubbansSlapShot t1_j07lhqc wrote
“Before the end of this decade”. We will wait and see, but sounds exciting. Of course, not having to rely solely on Taiwan for chips is also a plus
creativityfreeuserID t1_j07kooh wrote
Reply to comment by ckirk91 in iPhone 14 Crash Detection gets man to wife's accident before ambulance by chrisdh79
Congrats! You walked grandpa with chest pain/sob and threw him into cardiac arrest. Good choice though, 11/10 mental math
Avieshek OP t1_j07j4tx wrote
Reply to comment by Leanardoe in Japan to Manufacture 2nm Chips With a Little Help From IBM by Avieshek
With Japanese precision? Neat.
Leanardoe t1_j07iv7e wrote
reducing taiwan reliance? neat
[deleted] t1_j078hty wrote
Reply to comment by Crimsonsworn in iPhone 14 Crash Detection gets man to wife's accident before ambulance by chrisdh79
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j078bhz wrote
Reply to comment by sean101v in iPhone 14 Crash Detection gets man to wife's accident before ambulance by chrisdh79
[deleted]
ostertoaster1983 t1_j06w7xj wrote
Reply to comment by Sol33t303 in iPhone 14 Crash Detection gets man to wife's accident before ambulance by chrisdh79
You're making claims which, whether intentional or not, serve to discount the usefulness of this technology. First of all, your claim is a stretch for a number of reasons, people don't always take the same route, people aren't always going to the same places, there are countless scenarios which would make it incredibly hard to find someone who'd had an accident even if you're incredibly familiar with their daily routines. It sounds like you're discounting the tech because you were responding to points about what makes the tech valuable. Saying "but you could probably just guess where they are" is a pretty pointless response. Sure, you could, or you could know exactly where they are and where to send help which is much better than going off a hunch which has a too high chance of being wrong when we're talking about an emergency scenario. If your entire point is that, it's sometimes possible to guess where people are, I guess.... great? It's also possible to guess and be wrong while they lie bleeding 2 miles in the other direction.
Sol33t303 t1_j06rm67 wrote
Reply to comment by ostertoaster1983 in iPhone 14 Crash Detection gets man to wife's accident before ambulance by chrisdh79
Why do you claim I'm denying the benefits of it? I'm not.
> Why are you so bent on denying the benefits of this feature.
I feel like thats a lot of extrapolation from my one comment lmao. I'm not bent on anything.
I simply saying that in the present, without the above tech, you could make a good guess as to where it happened. As you said just now it's great that he was able to tell exactly where it was with 100% certainty, i'm not denying that in the slightest.
But without it, you could probably still take a guess and still be at least probably 80% accurate. I'm no trying to claim that it's better in the slightest, just that if you knew a crash happened after the audio cut out you could probably find them pretty fast even without it.
ostertoaster1983 t1_j06p355 wrote
Reply to comment by TeeJK15 in iPhone 14 Crash Detection gets man to wife's accident before ambulance by chrisdh79
I don't disagree, but not everyone uses that feature for a variety of reasons. My mom thinks constant location sharing is creepy but has me and my step dad in her phone as ICE contacts. She was in an accident earlier this year and I would have been grateful if she'd had this. I encouraged her and my step dad to do full time location sharing after that so we would know where she was if something happened again and she didn't want to. She'd do this though and I would rest easier if she had it.
ostertoaster1983 t1_j06ok4e wrote
Reply to comment by Sol33t303 in iPhone 14 Crash Detection gets man to wife's accident before ambulance by chrisdh79
This is an absurd take, people often deviate from normal routines for a variety of reasons. My mother was in an accident earlier this year where this would have been incredibly beneficial. Why are you so bent on denying the benefits of this feature. What's your goal here?
ostertoaster1983 t1_j06oeb8 wrote
Reply to comment by Hydroxychloroquinoa in iPhone 14 Crash Detection gets man to wife's accident before ambulance by chrisdh79
Not everyone uses, or wants to use, find my iphone. For people who think it's abnormal to constantly track their family members but who also may want to alert them if there is an emergency this is a great option. I don't understand the desire to drag this technology, it's almost indisputably a good feature.
sean101v t1_j06grtk wrote
Reply to comment by TreesmasherFTW in iPhone 14 Crash Detection gets man to wife's accident before ambulance by chrisdh79
You CAN be distracted, but that doesn’t MAKE you distracted. With your logic, the same would apply to talking to people who are in the car with you. Do you sit in compete silence every time you drive?
iamnotcanadianese t1_j06crrq wrote
Reply to comment by wmurch4 in iPhone 14 Crash Detection gets man to wife's accident before ambulance by chrisdh79
The greatest trick the devil ever played was making you believe you need an iPhone
MrR0b0t90 t1_j06ajwi wrote
Reply to comment by Cmaclsu in iPhone 14 Crash Detection gets man to wife's accident before ambulance by chrisdh79
Yes and they downvote you if you disagree or say anything bad about apple
TreesmasherFTW t1_j06a1j2 wrote
Reply to comment by Crimsonsworn in iPhone 14 Crash Detection gets man to wife's accident before ambulance by chrisdh79
You can have your hands free and still be distracted. You’re using your brain power to operate a vehicle while watching the road while talking to someone. You’re basically doing mental juggling.
Larsaf t1_j0651fs wrote
Reply to comment by Barium_Barista in iPhone 14 Crash Detection gets man to wife's accident before ambulance by chrisdh79
So everything on Reddit is fake, including you. Stop pretending you exist!
Cmaclsu t1_j063usq wrote
Reply to comment by wmurch4 in iPhone 14 Crash Detection gets man to wife's accident before ambulance by chrisdh79
Do Apple fans just upvote this nonsense? I don't get it.
zombimuncha t1_j07sf3h wrote
Reply to Japan to Manufacture 2nm Chips With a Little Help From IBM by Avieshek
So if the west relies less on Taiwan for chips, does that make it easier or harder for China to take over?