Recent comments in /f/gadgets

tr3v1n t1_j08m90j wrote

> Feels inherently dishonest.

It is dishonest, but it also stems from the fact that people got so focused on the numbers that they kept shrinking them because otherwise people wouldn't think there are improvements. If I remember correctly, the number itself was never actually super accurate as the different processes would measure things differently.

14

navigationallyaided t1_j08hvik wrote

Intel also has a fab in Hillsboro - but I haven’t heard plans for it.

The eventual goal with the new C-suite at Intel - they want to be a contract supplier. Many of the current IC companies who make important components or even whole systems like Qualcomm, Marvell, Nvidia, AMD and Apple don’t have their own fabs - TSMC and Samsung are doing that. I can see Apple and Intel becoming frenemies, much like the Apple-Samsung relationship. Companies that do work with the military or critical infrastructure might be compelled to have chips fabbed in the US as a matter of national security.

3

kiwifuel t1_j08eix1 wrote

I don’t think that’s true. Nm (logic gage size) has to do with transistor density. And it is one of several important factors in performance.

I think the average density coming out of a foundry is somewhere between 7 and 14. A foundry i visited in the Texas is pushing 12 nm. Intel and AMD do 7 and 5nm respectively.

2nm is nearing the physical limit. And will serve as a bottle neck in future design. It’s pretty neat. It’s only a few atoms wide.

−3

swisstraeng t1_j08a2s9 wrote

Well, they didn't. In reality the 2nm process has an expected gate size of around 45nm.

That doesn't mean they aren't finding cool ways to make the chips even more compact. Lots of less known terms like GAAFET. (some kind of vertical 3D transitors)

But the main issue with all of this, is that the prices to manufacture a single chip is higher and higher. Since now it's not a matter of size, but also of fabrication complexity and time.

If I were to guess, we'll get slowly stuck in 2025-2030 era regarding our current technology. I think this will be when we'll need to use alternatives, more power efficient ARM architecture, which is what Apple is already using for its M1 and M2 chips.

163

Pierogi_Master t1_j0875da wrote

Dexter Filkins talked about this on NPR Fresh Air recently. From memory a bit ago but basically as an island lots of things are imported, including the means of energy production. The island could be without power within a week or so of a blockade at the cost of 0 Chinese lives.

Elsewhere in the interview its mentioned that in war games the US simulates in an escalation that the US loses. One official stated we (the US) simply don't have the industrial base to manage a sustained conflict against the Chinese.

1