Recent comments in /f/gaming

Sabetha1183 t1_j6lw0ap wrote

I never really understood the whole "just admit the thing you like is bad" mentality.

If I thought it was bad, I probably wouldn't like it. Granted I think people have a hard time understanding that even a 5/10 game is average(or supposed to be on a 10 point scale) and can still be enjoyable for what it is.

I'll play a game and think it was flawed but fun and give it a 6 or 7 but I wouldn't look at a game and go "I enjoyed that well enough, 2/10 it's garbage".

That would feel a whole lot like that 2/10 isn't actually based on my opinion of the thing, but rather some other arbitrary standard I've imagined for it.

5

Sweatty-LittleFatty t1_j6lvapk wrote

Star Wars and COD is enought to take almost half your HD, both are filled with useless files that the company refuses to delete after an update, you can check their storage comsumption, it should be somewhere between 300-450gb.

The other games are mostly fine (I believe Cyberpunk is pretty big, and so is MH World), but you still have a lot of games installed, so, what exatcly are the complains?

1

Drukqsz t1_j6lva4m wrote

I got a wii recently so i could play rail shooters on it. You need an adapter for the hdmi tvs so it can format properly. I lowkey wanted a CRT but they are so bulky and just seems like it will take up too much space so i opted out.

2

Sycokinetic t1_j6luvvq wrote

It was a so-called WoW-killer that was specifically meant to be more successful than WoW. I think they ended up breaking the then-record for the highest-budget game? Or at least they came close. Obviously it was not more successful than WoW and eventually went F2P as a way to boost microtransactions, since subscriptions weren't cutting it.

I was saying it as a bad thing because they spent so much money and had such high aspirations, but ultimately they failed because they were trying to compete with WoW by making WoW.

0